White Conservatives are the biggest threat

[Scouts Honor]

12 hours ago, 1032004 said:

I don’t think it, I know it.

omg you are a fool

[1032004]

14 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

give me ONE video

just one

 

[1032004]

17 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

omg you are a fool

All of the violence is the left’s fault?

12 hours ago, 1032004 said:

So there wasn’t a MAGA dude that just targeted a Mormon church and killed 4 people?

You can argue that wasn’t “the right’s” fault and I’d agree, but it sure as hell wasn’t the left’s fault…

 

[Caveira]

55 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

now they are saying jay jones was joking when he was fantasizing about killing his opponent

 

 

you see, it's funny when conservatives die 

Jones then suggested that, presented with a hypothetical situation in which he had only two bullets and was faced with the choice of murdering then-Speaker of the House Todd Gilbert or two dictators, he’d shoot Gilbert “every time,” prompting pushback from his former colleague:

Jones: Three people, two bullets

Gilbert, hitler, and pol pot

Gilbert gets two bullets to the head

Spoiler: put Gilbert in the crew with the two worst people you know and he receives both bullets every time

Coyner: Jay

Please stop

Jones: Lol

Ok, ok

Coyner: It really bothers me when you talk about hurting people or wishing death on them

It isn’t ok

No matter who they are

The private messages offer a disturbing glimpse into how Jones — who is looking to oust incumbent Republican Attorney General Jason Miyares this fall — describes his political adversaries in private conversations. The violent rhetoric complicates an already contentious and competitive race roughly a month out from Election Day in Virginia, where early voting began on September 19.

[Caveira]

Pretty evil guy 

https://www.nationalreview.com/news/dem-ag-nominee-jay-jones-fantasized-about-shooting-former-virginia-gop-speaker-he-receives-both-bullets/amp/

Then at one point, the source said, he suggested he wished Gilbert’s wife could watch her own child die in her arms so that Gilbert might reconsider his political views, prompting Coyner to hang up the phone in disgust.

Afterward, Jones continued his barrage of text messages, saying he was just asking questions. Coyner dismissed his excuse via text and chastised Jones for “hopping [sic] Jennifer Gilbert’s children would die.”

Rather than deny that he had wished death on the children, Jones responded by saying, “Yes, I’ve told you this before. Only when people feel pain personally do they move on policy.”

Edited October 5 by Caveira

[Caveira]

 

[Scouts Honor]

1 hour ago, 1032004 said:

 

fox isn't a news source as you would say

it also isn't MSM

[1032004]

Just now, Scouts Honor said:

fox isn't a news source as you would say

it also isn't MSM

Yes, Fox News is part of the MSM

[Scouts Honor]

21 minutes ago, Caveira said:

 

this raises his stock in the eyes of the left

[Scouts Honor]

Just now, 1032004 said:

Yes, Fox News is part of the MSM

lol

nbc, abc, cbs

[1032004]

5 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

lol

nbc, abc, cbs

Fox News is part of the MSM

[Scouts Honor]

jay jones

conservatives need to tone down the rhetoric

[Scouts Honor]

 

[Scouts Honor]

 

[Scouts Honor]

 

[Bigbrog]

23 hours ago, 1032004 said:

You said “this is all on the left.”

It’s not.

OMG...right now it absolutely is mostly the left.  You are just being obtuse and partisan to say "both sides are doing it".  Both sides do do it but at this moment in time it is 95% the left.  And AGAIN, since you don't get it...it is wrong no matter what!!  Why is that so hard for you to understand??

[1032004]

1 minute ago, Bigbrog said:

OMG...right now it absolutely is mostly the left.  You are just being obtuse and partisan to say "both sides are doing it".  Both sides do do it but at this moment in time it is 95% the left.  And AGAIN, since you don't get it...it is wrong no matter what!!  Why is that so hard for you to understand??

Do what exactly?

[Bigbrog]

Just now, 1032004 said:

Do what exactly?

You can't be serious....

[1032004]

48 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

You can't be serious....

Yes.  Are you talking about all crime?  Just politically motivated crime?  “Rhetoric”?  Just want to make sure we’re on the same page.

[Bigbrog]

3 hours ago, 1032004 said:

Yes.  Are you talking about all crime?  Just politically motivated crime?  “Rhetoric”?  Just want to make sure we’re on the same page.

Now you are confused as to what we are talking about??  Did you forget everything that has already been posted...including the back and forth between you and I?  SMH

Right now the left is vastly committing more political violence, violent rhetoric and incitement than the right.  Which is very wrong!  And even if it were reversed it is and would be still very wrong.  Do you disagree with my sentences??

[1032004]

4 hours ago, Bigbrog said:

Now you are confused as to what we are talking about??  Did you forget everything that has already been posted...including the back and forth between you and I?  SMH

Right now the left is vastly committing more political violence, violent rhetoric and incitement than the right.  Which is very wrong!  And even if it were reversed it is and would be still very wrong.  Do you disagree with my sentences??

Yes.

If we’re talking “rhetoric,” that is absolutely pretty evenly split.

If we’re talking “political violence,” I don’t believe the left is committing “vastly more.” But you’d probably have to define “political violence.” If we’re talking serious violence like murder/attempted murder, I don’t think there’s a huge amount of “political violence” as a whole.    In the past year, how many have their been?  Charlie Kirk, the ICE shooting, and the Minnesota lawmakers?  So 2/3 motivated by the left?  I’d probably be OK with acknowledging that. 

[WrestlingRasta]

47 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Yes.

If we’re talking “rhetoric,” that is absolutely pretty evenly split.

If we’re talking “political violence,” I don’t believe the left is committing “vastly more.” But you’d probably have to define “political violence.” If we’re talking serious violence like murder/attempted murder, I don’t think there’s a huge amount of “political violence” as a whole.    In the past year, how many have their been?  Charlie Kirk, the ICE shooting, and the Minnesota lawmakers?  So 2/3 motivated by the left?  I’d probably be OK with acknowledging that. 

I’m not sure we can say with any certainty whatsoever who committed the violence against Charlie Kirk.  The “official” story isn’t adding up at all, which leaves all options on the table. 

[ionel]

12 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

I’m not sure we can say with any certainty whatsoever who committed the violence against Charlie Kirk.  The “official” story isn’t adding up at all, which leaves all options on the table. 

How so? 

[mspart]

14 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

I’m not sure we can say with any certainty whatsoever who committed the violence against Charlie Kirk.  The “official” story isn’t adding up at all, which leaves all options on the table. 

How so Rasta?   I'm interested in what you think on this one.   Not looking to argue, just why you think the above may be true.  What isn't adding up?

mspart

[Scouts Honor]

the official story isn't supposed to add up

that's the whole point. and has BEEN THE POINT for quite some time