Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Biden's initial loan forgiveness plan was deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court for exceeding executive authority without clear congressional backing.

Of course he never engaged in a conversation with the media because it wasn’t really him behind the plan.

  • Bob 1
  • Jagger 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, headshuck said:

Biden's initial loan forgiveness plan was deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court for exceeding executive authority without clear congressional backing.

Of course he never engaged in a conversation with the media because it wasn’t really him behind the plan.

Trump thinks Garcia has the literal letters M-S-1-3 tattooed on his knuckles, he’s not behind the plan either…

Posted

Again, Trump did not say he does not have to follow the Constitution.   He was asked about Due Process for Abrego and he was saying he was not clear on that particular matter.   He is leaving that up to the attorneys responsible for that.  

If you are going to insist that Trump said he does not have to follow the Constitution, then you are simply willfully being ignorant of the context of the conversation that was had, and quite literally knowingly acting ignorant because this has been explained a number of times.   It is not logical to pursue that line because you know the context in which this whole thing was said, similar to my example about Africans.   

You won't understand because you don't want to.   You want to take everything out of context and say see, he wants to be a dictator, he wants to be Hitler.   It ain't working guys.   It just shows how pathetic your reasoning ability and overall outlook is.   Try being reasonable, it works most of the time.  

mspart 

  • Bob 1
Posted

The interesting thing here, and everyone knows it whether they want to admit it or not, is that if it were Biden sitting in that chair giving that same answer, the same people who are trying to “context” it, and/or bringing in Biden to the conversation when he has nothing to do with it, just because they can’t get him off the brain, would be having a fit over him having that same answer.  
 

We saw plenty of those fits the previous four years. And we see the Biden inclusion all The time now over things where it’s completely irrelevant.  
 

But…something something DS 

Posted
1 hour ago, Tripnsweep said:

Did Biden ever say publicly that he didn't know if he was supposed to uphold the constitution?

That is a very simple yes or no question. Judging by how you continue to avoid it, I'm going to assume the answer is no. Because if it was yes, you would have brought it up. Instead you introduce other things that are not relevant to the topic. Which is that Trump is either extremely cognitively impaired, doesn't understand the duties of his job, is unwilling to learn them, or some combination of all 3.

You’re too clueless to realize he’s got lawyers interpreting things. Thats why he said it.  But you knew that already because 15 people have told you. 

Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, mspart said:

Again, Trump did not say he does not have to follow the Constitution.   He was asked about Due Process for Abrego and he was saying he was not clear on that particular matter.   He is leaving that up to the attorneys responsible for that.  

If you are going to insist that Trump said he does not have to follow the Constitution, then you are simply willfully being ignorant of the context of the conversation that was had, and quite literally knowingly acting ignorant because this has been explained a number of times.   It is not logical to pursue that line because you know the context in which this whole thing was said, similar to my example about Africans.   

You won't understand because you don't want to.   You want to take everything out of context and say see, he wants to be a dictator, he wants to be Hitler.   It ain't working guys.   It just shows how pathetic your reasoning ability and overall outlook is.   Try being reasonable, it works most of the time.  

mspart 

This 💯 

 

Maybe slipsntweet will catch on 

Edited by JimmySpeaks
  • Bob 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

The interesting thing here, and everyone knows it whether they want to admit it or not, is that if it were Biden sitting in that chair giving that same answer, the same people who are trying to “context” it, and/or bringing in Biden to the conversation when he has nothing to do with it, just because they can’t get him off the brain, would be having a fit over him having that same answer.  
 

We saw plenty of those fits the previous four years. And we see the Biden inclusion all The time now over things where it’s completely irrelevant.  
 

But…something something DS 

For someone with TDS you sure seem to care about Biden getting talked about.  Kinda weird 

  • Haha 1
Posted
6 hours ago, mspart said:

The discussion was regarding deporting illegal aliens.  When the question of the constitution came up this is the context and why he responded that if they had to do millions of jury hearings, that would be too expensive. 

KRISTEN WELKER:

Your secretary of state says everyone who’s here, citizens and non-citizens, deserve due process. Do you agree, Mr. President?                                               

PRES. DONALD TRUMP:

I don’t know. I’m not, I’m not a lawyer. I don’t know.                                               

KRISTEN WELKER:

Well, the Fifth Amendment says as much.                                               

PRES. DONALD TRUMP:

I don’t know. It seems — it might say that, but if you’re talking about that, then we’d have to have a million or 2 million or 3 million trials. We have thousands of people that are some murderers and some drug dealers and some of the worst people on Earth.                                               

KRISTEN WELKER:

But is —                                               

PRES. DONALD TRUMP:

Some of the worst, most dangerous people on Earth. And I was elected to get them the hell out of here and the courts are holding me from doing it.                                               

KRISTEN WELKER:

But even given those numbers that you’re talking about, don’t you need to uphold the Constitution of the United States as president?                                               

PRES. DONALD TRUMP:

I don’t know. I have to respond by saying, again, I have brilliant lawyers that work for me, and they are going to obviously follow what the Supreme Court said. What you said is not what I heard the Supreme Court said. They have a different interpretation.

The question was about due process and the constitutional guarantee of due process.   Due process does not mean a jury trial in the case of immigration.   An immigration judge stating the illegal needs to be deported is due process.   It's best to understand things based on context.   The context is due process in deporting illegals.  The context is not the Constitution which everyone is trying to make this.  


The next question is why is the press and the left willing to die on the Abrego hill?  If he does come back, he will just be deported again.   The conditions of his "stay in the US for free card" are not the same as they were in 2019 and he could easily be deported with those details brought before an immigration judge.   The man was transporting illegals using his boss's car with no license to drive.   And the boss is in jail for transporting illegals.   Put 2 and 2 together folks on Abrego.   But the questioning that has everyone all jittery was all about the treatment of illegal aliens.  You'll notice that no one is talking about the child citizens who were deported anymore.   Because it was  a non story.   Mom was being deported and wanted her children to come with her.   Period, end of story.   No apologies for not investigating more and figuring that out on their own, the press is completely out of control on their non investigative approach to reporting news.   This is very much the case.   Take a quote out of context and run with it to show the Pres does not feel he has to follow the Constitution in any case whatsoever. 

mspart

but but trump is orange

Posted
6 hours ago, Tripnsweep said:

Due process is part of the Constitution.

Are you people really going to try to rationalize this? The guy is clearly unfit to be president if he can't even answer a simple yes or no question about the core duty of the office. 

stop gaslighting.

you white knighted for obama when many to most of his deportees also got no 'due process'

Posted
2 hours ago, Tripnsweep said:

What does anything Biden may have done have to do with Trump not knowing or understanding one of the core duties of his office?

Nobody has been able to answer that. 

omg you are such a .. i dont even know what to call you

the TDS is so strong... i bet you know what color under wear he is wearing

 

Posted
1 hour ago, headshuck said:

Biden's initial loan forgiveness plan was deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court for exceeding executive authority without clear congressional backing.

Of course he never engaged in a conversation with the media because it wasn’t really him behind the plan.

i was just going to post to trimp that 

NO ONE ever asked him ANY questions about anything of substance

Posted

Obviously Biden didn't believe in the Constitution and did not fulfill his oath of office.  If he had Trump wouldn't have to be wasting his time on a workaround.  I don't understand how Obama was able to cage immigrants & children, deport them and carry out drone strikes without due process.  Maybe they taught him a loop hole at Harvard Law.  Also how did we get around due process with the 911 perpetrators sent to GITMO?  Maybe they were never in the US but I do remember folks complaining. 

.

Posted

it's 2030

america is being invaded

trump sends the military to bottle up the beach head and send them back into the sea

an activist judge stops the military from shooting... demanding a hearing for each soldier before they can be attacked

dems and crazy woke wingers (but I repeat myself) applaud the judges ruling

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

it's 2030

america is being invaded

trump sends the military to bottle up the beach head and send them back into the sea

an activist judge stops the military from shooting... demanding a hearing for each soldier before they can be attacked

dems and crazy woke wingers (but I repeat myself) applaud the judges ruling

 

Es ist schockierend, dass Sie das nicht auf Deutsch gepostet haben.

  • Bob 1

.

Posted
1 hour ago, JimmySpeaks said:

For someone with TDS you sure seem to care about Biden getting talked about.  Kinda weird 

I dont’t think I’ve mentioned Trump since November as many times as you’ve mentioned Biden this week, and we’re only two days in. 
 

But you know….feelings.  Something something DS

Posted
2 hours ago, headshuck said:

By the time of the interview he was hoping to bait the interviewer into what he knew would be an admission that the symbols was an equivalent.

The interviewer literally said “he had tattoos that can be interpreted that way,” and Trump said “no not interpreted.  Clear as day!”

lol

Posted
9 hours ago, 1032004 said:

Pretty sure he has not been released (he was just transferred to a different prison), but if you have a link please share.  If he was released, why isn’t he back here via the plane we offered? We were told the only holdup was Bukele not releasing him.

The ruling said to “ensure the case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador.”  How can they do that if he is not in the US?

Sorry, but you’re the one doing mental gymnastics here.

Possibly El Salvador’s president doesn’t want to make him and the USA can’t compel him.   

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...