Is theft of federal funds LEGAL?

[Paul158]

It's a federal crime embezzle, steal, obtain through fraud, or knowingly convert federal program funds. I hope the DOJ is right behind DOGE.

[1032004]

What theft have they found?  I wouldn’t necessarily count the 200 year-olds they claim are on the social security rolls because 1) they may not have even been receiving money, and 2) even if they were it could have just been a typo.

But yes, if they do actually find theft the thief should absolutely be prosecuted.

[Scouts Honor]

well, it hasn't been, thats why they are all so freaking out

[Scouts Honor]

1 hour ago, 1032004 said:

What theft have they found?  I wouldn’t necessarily count the 200 year-olds they claim are on the social security rolls because 1) they may not have even been receiving money, and 2) even if they were it could have just been a typo.

But yes, if they do actually find theft the thief should absolutely be prosecuted.

[red viking]

6 hours ago, Paul158 said:

It's a federal crime embezzle, steal, obtain through fraud, or knowingly convert federal program funds. I hope the DOJ is right behind DOGE.

Yah, keep drinking the Kool Aid. They made a lot of bs claims w zero proof and VERY limited evidence. 

[1032004]

6 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

What theft have they found?  

[Scouts Honor]

if you haven't read any of the other posts... i can't help you

[red viking]

5 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

if you haven't read any of the other posts... i can't help you

I just see lots of accusations. 

[1032004]

14 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

if you haven't read any of the other posts... i can't help you

Which posts? 

[red viking]

Just now, 1032004 said:

Which posts? 

The ones that reference the empty bs claims made by DOGE. 

[1032004]

10 minutes ago, red viking said:

The ones that reference the empty bs claims made by DOGE. 

And even those are mostly talking about alleged “waste,” not theft.

[red viking]

10 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

And even those are mostly talking about alleged “waste,” not theft.

And the Winger definition of waste = "any spending that I don't like." 

[Paul158]

If the liberal media actually did some honest reporting, you would be well informed of what is real and what is false. There are live videos of DOGE meetings on you tube you can watch for yourself. It is very educational. I would say a good number of people are lawyering up. Probably erasing a lot of data and shredding a lot of documents. 

[red viking]

6 minutes ago, Paul158 said:

If the liberal media actually did some honest reporting, you would be well informed of what is real and what is false. There are live videos of DOGE meetings on you tube you can watch for yourself. It is very educational. I would say a good number of people are lawyering up. Probably erasing a lot of data and shredding a lot of documents. 

Yes. "The media" is in on the govt waste conspiracy. Of course. 

[Paul158]

15 minutes ago, red viking said:

Yes. "The media" is in on the govt waste conspiracy. Of course. 

Waste, fraud, corruption and theft. The liberal media is using the good old Sergent Schultz brush-off. I hear nothing, I see nothing I know nothing. If they did their job and reported some facts that would be great.

Edited 6 hours ago by Paul158
missed a word

[red viking]

6 minutes ago, Paul158 said:

Waste, fraud, corruption and theft. The liberal media is using the good old Sergent Schultz brush-off. I hear nothing, I see nothing I know nothing. If they did their job and reported some facts that would be great.

And it MUST be there because Trump, DOGE and whack job fringe rt wing media says it does. 

[ionel]

19 minutes ago, red viking said:

And it MUST be there because Trump, DOGE and whack job fringe rt wing media says it does. 

And it CAN'T be there because TDS infection says orange man bad and left winger media says Trump always lies. 

[red viking]

3 minutes ago, ionel said:

And it CAN'T be there because TDS infection says orange man bad and left winger media says Trump always lies. 

Well, typically you should have some actual concrete evidence before making claims. That's how the real world works. 

[ionel]

10 minutes ago, red viking said:

Well, typically you should have some actual concrete evidence before making claims. That's how the real world works. 

I assume that'd be true of claims of lying 1,000 times per day and 'orange man bad'  as well?  Course it's the swamp and that's not really the real world.  

[Paul158]

24 minutes ago, red viking said:

Well, typically you should have some actual concrete evidence before making claims. That's how the real world works. 

Just do a little research on your own. Look at "ALL" the data with an open mind, then decide for yourself what is true. It really isn't hard to find if you have the desire to do so. You as a taxpayer should be very concerned where you tax dollars are going.

[1032004]

1 hour ago, Paul158 said:

If the liberal media actually did some honest reporting, you would be well informed of what is real and what is false. There are live videos of DOGE meetings on you tube you can watch for yourself. It is very educational. I would say a good number of people are lawyering up. Probably erasing a lot of data and shredding a lot of documents. 

I have been following Doge’s x page.  I don’t recall specific claims of theft.  But feel free to refresh my memory.  And the video posted recently with the claim about peas or whatever was not a claim of theft.

[headshuck]

Yeah, they’re probably going to post fraud evidence on a public webpage

[1032004]

2 minutes ago, headshuck said:

Yeah, they’re probably going to post fraud evidence on a public webpage

Why wouldn’t they?  The admin has been posting their “evidence” against Abrego Garcia.  Including his wife’s address.

Edited 4 hours ago by 1032004

[1032004]

5 minutes ago, headshuck said:

Yeah, they’re probably going to post fraud evidence on a public webpage

Also, @Paul158 seems to think it’s been posted 

[Le duke]

Yeah, they’re probably going to post fraud evidence on a public webpage

They haven’t been shy about saying people are committing SS fraud.

If they are so sure, why aren’t people being charged?

Surely our high tech overlords are referring people committing crimes to the relevant parties for investigation, right? Should be pretty cut and dry, I’d think.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk