Ono eligibility

[CHROMEBIRD]

8 minutes ago, Boring said:

A guy earlier in the thread said Ono already had 3 years of college in Japan. 

I didn't think the NCAA still started the 5in4 eligibility clock for international transfers or even NAIA or CC kids anymore. Like there are Euro bball players who get 4 years of eligibility when they transfer here. Maybe they weren't full time at their old unis though, idk.

[Jason Bryant]

Pretty sure pistol duel scheduling should take place in NWT or the Zoo.  

I didn’t think supporting a duel championship was a thing in PSU threads ….


oh wait.

D-U-E-L.

My bad.

[Seanyd]

Boring is Tim Walz's lesbian nephew.

[Doublehalf]

On 5/1/2025 at 8:56 AM, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said:

On 5/1/2025 at 8:49 AM, Boring said:

I think as long as he's following the rules and isn't protesting anything, he is probably going to be ok?

I know we're trying to steer away from politics but I just have to point out the absolute absurdity of this comment-

"following the rules and isn't protecting..."

is an unbelievable thing to say from someone that I assume is proud to be an American and would seemingly be a person in a crowd chanting "U-S-A, U-S-A!

The right to free speech and ability to protest is one of the most quintessential American things to do. 
 

The fact this comment was so casually stated is frighteningly disappointing and disturbing. The unconscious brainwashing has really taken its toll to the point someone would claim protesting is not following the rules when it is a citizens constitutional right to do so.

[Le duke]

I know we're trying to steer away from politics but I just have to point out the absolute absurdity of this comment-
"following the rules and isn't protecting..."
is an unbelievable thing to say from someone that I assume is proud to be an American and would seemingly be a person in a crowd chanting "U-S-A, U-S-A!
The right to free speech and ability to protest is one of the most quintessential American things to do. 
 
The fact this comment was so casually stated is frighteningly disappointing and disturbing. The unconscious brainwashing has really taken its toll to the point someone would claim protesting is not following the rules when it is a citizens constitutional right to do so.

Well said.

“As long as you relinquish your first Amendment rights, the government won’t persecute you” is where we’re at in 2025.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Interviewed_at_Weehawken]

10 hours ago, Doublehalf said:

I know we're trying to steer away from politics but I just have to point out the absolute absurdity of this comment-

"following the rules and isn't protecting..."

is an unbelievable thing to say from someone that I assume is proud to be an American and would seemingly be a person in a crowd chanting "U-S-A, U-S-A!

The right to free speech and ability to protest is one of the most quintessential American things to do. 
 

The fact this comment was so casually stated is frighteningly disappointing and disturbing. The unconscious brainwashing has really taken its toll to the point someone would claim protesting is not following the rules when it is a citizens constitutional right to do so.

Here is the disappointing and disturbing problem with your post: We are talking about non-citizens.

[Mr. PeanutButter]

16 minutes ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said:

Here is the disappointing and disturbing problem with your post: We are talking about non-citizens.

Doesn't the constitution say something about inalienable rights for all munchkins tho

[ionel]

13 hours ago, Doublehalf said:

The unconscious brainwashing has really taken its toll to the point someone would claim protesting is not following the rules when it is a citizens constitutional right to do so.

 

2 hours ago, Mr. PeanutButter said:

Doesn't the constitution say something about inalienable rights for all munchkins tho

But you said citizens above not munchkins.  

[okokzach]

The Constitution does distinguish in some respects between the rights of citizens and noncitizens: the right not to be discriminatorily denied the vote and the right to run for federal elective office are expressly restricted to citizens. All other rights, however, are written without such a limitation.

The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment due process and equal protection guarantees extend to all "persons." The rights attaching to criminal trials, including the right to a public trial, a trial by jury, the assistance of a lawyer, and the right to confront adverse witnesses, all apply to "the accused." And both the First Amendment's protections of political and religious freedoms and the Fourth Amendment's protection of privacy and liberty apply to "the people."

The fact that the Framers chose to limit to citizens only the rights to vote and to run for federal office is one indication that they did not intend other constitutional rights to be so limited. Accordingly, the Supreme Court has squarely stated that neither the First Amendment nor the Fifth Amendment "acknowledges any distinction between citizens and resident aliens."

For more than a century, the Court has recognized that the Equal Protection Clause is "universal in [its] application, to all persons within the territorial jurisdiction, without regard to differences of ... nationality." The Court has repeatedly stated that "the Due Process Clause applies to all 'persons' within the United States, including aliens, whether their presence here is lawful, unlawful, temporary, or permanent."

Source

[Le duke]

Here is the disappointing and disturbing problem with your post: We are talking about non-citizens.

The 14th Amendment still exists.

Every person on US soil still has equal protection from the government.

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S8-C18-8-7-2/ALDE_00001262/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Gene Mills Fan]

Ono is just above the munchkin line.  Who's the first President that should go to jail for this practice? Oops where am I.

I swear I was in a wrestling forum topic.

[ionel]

5 minutes ago, Gene Mills Fan said:

 Oops where am I.

Very close to the Zoo, it's just around the corner, when you see Porta you know you are there.   

[Interviewed_at_Weehawken]

19 hours ago, Mr. PeanutButter said:

Doesn't the constitution say something about inalienable rights for all munchkins tho

Not what he said, nor what the constitution says.

[Interviewed_at_Weehawken]

16 hours ago, Le duke said:

 

The 14th Amendment still exists.

Every person on US soil still has equal protection from the government.

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S8-C18-8-7-2/ALDE_00001262/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Not what I was responding to was it?

Has any amendment or court decision ever been subjected to further interpretation by the Court?

[scourge165]

18 hours ago, ionel said:

 

But you said citizens above not munchkins.  

Yeah, because someone wrote something as stupid as 'as long as he doesn't protest.' 

 

That's where we are. The well informed electorate. 'He can be here... long as he doesn't say anything but good things about this country.' 

That doesn't sound authoritarian at all!

[Interviewed_at_Weehawken]

34 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

Yeah, because someone wrote something as stupid as 'as long as he doesn't protest.' 

 

That's where we are. The well informed electorate. 'He can be here... long as he doesn't say anything but good things about this country.' 

That doesn't sound authoritarian at all!

Uh, just because I was explaining current policy doesn't mean that I am not well-informed.  In fact, I would say that it makes me better informed than you.  You don't have to agree with the policy to admit it exists.

First of all, I'm all for protest.  I'm just saying "that's the way it is at the moment."

But I'm also not opposed to asking guests to behave in a certain way.  

[EntertainMe]

On 5/1/2025 at 7:49 AM, Boring said:

I'm going out on a limb, but I bet it's related to US government regulations somehow. They are actively deporting foreign students like crazy right now, for example, regardless of the status of their visas, passports, etc. To be honest I'm shocked that Ono would want to come to the USA right now, if I was a foreigner I'd be steering well clear of the USA. 

 

Stop watching the MSM and look at what is happening. Ono is fine, and so is anyone who respects the law.

 

[scourge165]

6 minutes ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said:

Uh, just because I was explaining current policy doesn't mean that I am not well-informed.  In fact, I would say that it makes me better informed than you.  You don't have to agree with the policy to admit it exists.

First of all, I'm all for protest.  I'm just saying "that's the way it is at the moment."

I didn't even reply to you or say a word to you, but if you're granted a Student Visa, you're allowed all the protections that come with the 1st amendment. 

That includes being able to protest. 

 

9 minutes ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said:

But I'm also not opposed to asking guests to behave in a certain way.  

I can't possibly see how we'd have issues with behaving in what you deem to be a "certain way." 

 

 

This was actually because of the stupid posts about how 

22 hours ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said:

Here is the disappointing and disturbing problem with your post: We are talking about non-citizens.

I WASN'T actually responding to this post, but as long as I am, it's certainly in conflict with your belief that you're well informed. 

[Interviewed_at_Weehawken]

42 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

 

I WASN'T actually responding to this post, but as long as I am, it's certainly in conflict with your belief that you're well informed. 

See, this shows how silly you are. I was literally responding to a post where the person was talking about the constitutional rights of CITIZENS.

Also, you are literally saying that I am poorly informed because you might disagree with me.  That is a real problem.  People will never be able to have productive discussions with that type of attitude.

Edited 1 hour ago by Interviewed_at_Weehawken

[Boring]

21 minutes ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said:

See, this shows how silly you are. I was literally responding to a post where the person was talking about the constitutional rights of CITIZENS.

Also, you are literally saying that I am poorly informed because you might disagree with me.  That is a real problem.  People will never be able to have productive discussions with that type of attitude.

In other words you are entitled to your own beliefs, but you are not entitled to your own facts. I agree. Facts are facts. Trump supporters really, really hate facts. I mentioned Trump deporting people illegally, which he's done, and I got a bunch of negative reactions. Cultists hate any criticism of Dear Leader, after all.

Edited 1 hour ago by Boring

[Boring]

1 hour ago, EntertainMe said:

Stop watching the MSM and look at what is happening. Ono is fine, and so is anyone who respects the law.

 

I don't even watch TV. I'm not a Trumpanzee brainwashing himself watching treason media day after day after day. 

[Boring]

14 hours ago, Gene Mills Fan said:

Ono is just above the munchkin line.  Who's the first President that should go to jail for this practice? Oops where am I.

I swear I was in a wrestling forum topic.

Ono is 125 pounds, right? I think that's well below the munchkin line. 

[Seanyd]

14 minutes ago, Boring said:

Ono is 125 pounds, right? I think that's well below the munchkin line. 

Do you follow wrestling? 

[Gene Mills Fan]

10 minutes ago, Boring said:

Ono is 125 pounds, right? I think that's well below the munchkin line. 

Trump supporters really, really hate facts

 

4.67 - Height in feet, of tallest Munchkin of OZ

I said above the munchkin line

 

Ono is 

Height

160 cm (5 ft 3 in)

 

[Interviewed_at_Weehawken]

1 hour ago, scourge165 said:

I didn't even reply to you or say a word to you, but if you're granted a Student Visa, you're allowed all the protections that come with the 1st amendment. 

You literally referenced my post