Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
23 hours ago, red viking said:

That's another lie. Stock market is collapsing in large part BECAUSE of the impact on the poor and middle class. That's who ultimately pays tariffs. They're simply a regressive tax on poorer people. 

did they care about this in 2011?

did the left care about this in 2020? 

why now... ? 

oh yeah

Posted
29 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

did they care about this in 2011?

did the left care about this in 2020? 

why now... ? 

oh yeah

I'm not even sure what this means?

Are you talking about when Obama put a tariffs on TIRES? He put tariffs...on TIRES for 20% less now than we're putting tariffs on EVERYTHING. 

Again, this fundamental concept...blanket tariffs vs targeted. 

How do you equate this nonsense?

Posted
18 hours ago, scourge165 said:

I'm not even sure what this means?

Are you talking about when Obama put a tariffs on TIRES? He put tariffs...on TIRES for 20% less now than we're putting tariffs on EVERYTHING. 

Again, this fundamental concept...blanket tariffs vs targeted. 

How do you equate this nonsense?

i equate wanting to destroy wall street to then and now.

  • Fire 1
  • Clown 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

i equate wanting to destroy wall street to then and now.

I really just don't understand what the point of these comments are.

Elections were rigged in 2020(and 2016 in the primaries Trump didn't win and in the general where he didn't win the popular vote) and then they were also going to be rigged in 2024, but he didn't.

 

WTF am I supposed to answer for a directionless movement from 2011?
How does THAT mean that tanking the Global Economy is a good thing?

 

And to be clear, it wasn't just Democrats pissed about golden parachutes for Bankers, but is this Jimmy's burner?

 

Should I KEEP posting about how Trump said anytime there's a 1000 point drop in the DOW over 2 days the President should be impeached when the DOW dropped ~5000 points in a little over 2 days?

 

Your point makes no sense. Did "they" care. WTF is "they" do you?

Posted
12 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

i equate wanting to destroy wall street to then and now.

 

19 hours ago, Scouts Honor said:

did they care about this in 2011?

did the left care about this in 2020? 

why now... ? 

oh yeah

Also...explain why you would think they WOULDN'T care in 2020? Whoever the "they" is, you're clearly making the...moronic argument that people ONLY care that their we saw record drops under Trump.

You DO realize Trump was in office in 2020, right?

 

So...yeah, explain this..."point" you're making?

Posted
4 hours ago, scourge165 said:

 

Also...explain why you would think they WOULDN'T care in 2020? Whoever the "they" is, you're clearly making the...moronic argument that people ONLY care that their we saw record drops under Trump.

You DO realize Trump was in office in 2020, right?

 

So...yeah, explain this..."point" you're making?

in 2020 they shut down everything... 

Posted
4 hours ago, scourge165 said:

I really just don't understand what the point of these comments are.

Elections were rigged in 2020(and 2016 in the primaries Trump didn't win and in the general where he didn't win the popular vote) and then they were also going to be rigged in 2024, but he didn't.

 

WTF am I supposed to answer for a directionless movement from 2011?
How does THAT mean that tanking the Global Economy is a good thing?

 

And to be clear, it wasn't just Democrats pissed about golden parachutes for Bankers, but is this Jimmy's burner?

 

Should I KEEP posting about how Trump said anytime there's a 1000 point drop in the DOW over 2 days the President should be impeached when the DOW dropped ~5000 points in a little over 2 days?

 

Your point makes no sense. Did "they" care. WTF is "they" do you?

you should really ask bernie about super delegates if you want to talk about that kind of thing

Posted
7 hours ago, Scouts Honor said:

in 2020 they shut down everything... 

...when Trump was President, right?

 

You're still using "they" to include...who? Just literally EVERYONE but the people who are enjoying Trump tanking this market?

Posted

Trump announced he would be adding tariffs to pharmaceuticals. They had initially been carved out. About 2/3 of the brand names and about 80% of the generics are made outside the US. We already pay the highest drug prices in the developed world, driven primarily by corporate greed and government not regulating prices. They're about to go up.

  • Bob 1

You are a voice of reason. - @Paul158

Posted
11 minutes ago, headshuck said:

If only we could get the names of the pharma companies that are likely to get contracts to produce generics domestically.

And as we all know, manufacturing can just instantly transfer.  No one will suffer!  Lets just hope nobody has any medical issues or retires during this very brief transition.

  • Brain 1

You are a voice of reason. - @Paul158

Posted
And as we all know, manufacturing can just instantly transfer.  No one will suffer!  Lets just hope nobody has any medical issues or retires during this very brief transition.

You don’t think it’s likely that in the interim other countries will ramp up production with new agreements with the US?
Posted

Found this chart interesting...it's from a Jan 2025 article...for some reason I can't paste the link??  FYI so it isn't confusing...this chart is for drug API's, which are the chemical components used to make the final dug product.

Anyway, does seem a little concerning...maybe the tariffs will prompt a quick increase in the production of these API's in the US, but per the article there is limited infrastructure in the US to come close to making enough to support all drug production for the US and it would take some time to get that infrastructure built. 

 

The-U.S.-Drug-Supply-Chain-Is-Vulnerable.png

  • Bob 1
Posted
1 hour ago, VakAttack said:

 We already pay the highest drug prices in the developed world, driven primarily by corporate greed and government not regulating prices. 

why is that btw, and why has sen warren suddenly changed her tune on big pharma

Posted
56 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

Found this chart interesting...it's from a Jan 2025 article...for some reason I can't paste the link??  FYI so it isn't confusing...this chart is for drug API's, which are the chemical components used to make the final dug product.

Anyway, does seem a little concerning...maybe the tariffs will prompt a quick increase in the production of these API's in the US, but per the article there is limited infrastructure in the US to come close to making enough to support all drug production for the US and it would take some time to get that infrastructure built. 

 

The-U.S.-Drug-Supply-Chain-Is-Vulnerable.png

i would go a step further and just say

the US is overreliant on drugs

  • Bob 1
  • Fire 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

why is that btw, and why has sen warren suddenly changed her tune on big pharma

I already explained the one, the second is a pointless strawman.

  • Brain 1

You are a voice of reason. - @Paul158

Posted
3 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

corporate greed, which warren has no interest anymore...

...I don't care what Elizabeth Warren feels or thinks on this issue, though I tend to doubt what you're saying.  I gave MY position.

  • Brain 1

You are a voice of reason. - @Paul158

Posted
On 4/5/2025 at 7:21 PM, red viking said:

I'm not insecure w my sexuality like u are so if somebody wants to be called a woman ill call them a woman. Don't really care. 

It's not really that complicated. 

To think...that's probably why we're in this position. They're so scared of...a TINY % of the population they'll likely never interact with. 

 

 

Market is....sky rocketing right now though. Is there a rumor of some sort, some deal? 

Posted

Image

 

There will be a 90 days pause on some of the tariffs (unclear which ones at this point).  Glad that's happening, but this was a catastrophe of his own making, so he hasn't solved anything other than realizing (maybe?) that his initial choice was moronic.

  • Haha 2

You are a voice of reason. - @Paul158

Posted (edited)

If you want to put it on big pharma, Make marijuana federally legal so cancer patients (and other patients) don’t have to spend $750-1000 a month to get the kind of relief that doesn’t come with the whiteboard full of drugs they are prescribed but does come with 10 different side effects per pill….

 

Thats my soapbox for the day.  Have fun yall. 

Edited by WrestlingRasta
  • Fire 1
  • Jagger 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...