Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, VakAttack said:

Out of many, many, many, many, many, many (geezus, stop posting seventeen different posts in a row, just make it one) stupid things you wrote, this is the dumbest one.  There are no studies making mice transgender.  The mice are transgenic, where human cells are included into the mice so that we can see how human cells and tissue respond to various things.

are you saying i have to wait for someone to respond before I can post another example of the symptom.

sir, I was told this is America.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

love to hear you tell us the 'real' reason Biden refused to let Musk help.

i am assuming that is the 'lie' you are referring to.

Yes that is the lie.  It is the exact opposite of the answer given by what they claim is the “source”

Posted
1 hour ago, jross said:

Semantics.  It's not research on 'transgender mice.'  It is research on the affects of giving male hormones to female mice in support of human transgender care.

$2.5M to study how testosterone impacts ovarian function in female mice.  Review the history of payouts 

https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/10619517

 

Reproductive Consequences of Steroid Hormone Administration

Recent data estimates 1.4 million transgender adults and 150,000 transgender adolescents live in the United States, many of whom are on cross-sex hormone therapy with estradiol or testosterone (T)...

Project started May 1, 2019 with end date of April 2025.  Payouts of $500K annual over multiple years...

The study focused on administering steroid hormones like testosterone to female mice and observing the effects on their reproductive systems. This aligns with efforts to model the effects of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT), such as testosterone use in transgender men, to understand potential impacts on fertility... 

I’m sure for the previous four years when the old guy flat out lied to the world you figured out a way to call it semantics….right? 

Posted
36 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

so we will think he voted for trump

There’s this saying that you can keep quiet and allow the world to think you’re really dumb, or you can make certain comments that will remove all doubt. 
 

You really should pay more attention. 

Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

um

He also stated that the return was delayed by the Biden Administration for political reasons.

Except he didn’t state that, he specifically said he thought politics “was not playing into this at all.” That’s the lie…

Edited by 1032004
Posted
1 hour ago, WrestlingRasta said:

There’s this saying that you can keep quiet and allow the world to think you’re really dumb, or you can make certain comments that will remove all doubt. 
 

You really should pay more attention. 

you think he voted for trump

maybe i have been giving you too much credit 

Posted
3 hours ago, jross said:

Semantics.  It's not research on 'transgender mice.'  It is research on the affects of giving male hormones to female mice in support of human transgender care.

 

I do agree with this (for $5MM of the $8MM claimed).  They weren’t “turning mice transgender,” but it did seem like most of the studies were focused around seeing the impact of procedures that were used for trans folks.

Posted
1 hour ago, 1032004 said:

Except he didn’t state that, he specifically said he thought politics “was not playing into this at all.” That’s the lie…

so again, i ask, what was the real reason

Posted
14 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said:

I’m sure for the previous four years when the old guy flat out lied to the world you figured out a way to call it semantics….right? 

Yes Trump lies, exaggerates, uses rhetoric, etc.  Which example do you refer?

And midwits keep midwitting...

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, 1032004 said:

I do agree with this (for $5MM of the $8MM claimed).  They weren’t “turning mice transgender,” but it did seem like most of the studies were focused around seeing the impact of procedures that were used for trans folks.

But they are perfectly appropriate to try on trans kids first.   Experimenting on kids is compassionate medical care!

mspart

Edited by mspart
Posted
On 3/7/2025 at 3:18 PM, mspart said:

But they are perfectly appropriate to try on trans kids first.   Experimenting on kids is compassionate medical care!

mspart

Maybe stick a sock in your trans care bullsh*** posts.

You don't personally care about any trans kids at all. Or for any trans people at all for that matter.

You are incapable of understanding and empathizing with anybody who's profile doesn't fit in your small mind.

Let's get this out in the open - there are very few trans people in the US.

Political BS has made it appear that trans people are a gigantic enemy. Nothing could be further from the truth.

And, if you've noticed, the politicians have mostly stopped talking about trans entirely.

If you want to keep going on like a puppet who was trained by a political stunt - then you should keep going.

Posted
On 3/10/2025 at 3:28 AM, RockLobster said:

Maybe stick a sock in your trans care bullsh*** posts.

You don't personally care about any trans kids at all. Or for any trans people at all for that matter.

You are incapable of understanding and empathizing with anybody who's profile doesn't fit in your small mind.

Let's get this out in the open - there are very few trans people in the US.

Political BS has made it appear that trans people are a gigantic enemy. Nothing could be further from the truth.

And, if you've noticed, the politicians have mostly stopped talking about trans entirely.

If you want to keep going on like a puppet who was trained by a political stunt - then you should keep going.

Not sure how you made the leap to mspart hating Trans as I didn't get that out of his post??

And by the way, who made trans people a huge topic considering how rare they actually are??

Posted (edited)
On 3/10/2025 at 1:28 AM, RockLobster said:

Maybe stick a sock in your trans care bullsh*** posts.

You don't personally care about any trans kids at all. Or for any trans people at all for that matter.  Your opinioin and you are welcome to it.   I care about these kids and that is why I am vocal about the experimentation they are admittedly doing to these kids.  

You are incapable of understanding and empathizing with anybody who's profile doesn't fit in your small mind.   I understand and sympathize with kids who are being sterilized.   I understand and sympathize with kids who will have their bodies ruined for the rest of their lives when they didn't understand the consequences of these decisions.  I sympathize with these kids that adults are doing this to them and those adults are practicing abuse on a most monstrous scale. 

Let's get this out in the open - there are very few trans people in the US.    So what?   So now you are saying because there are just a few we should experiment with their bodies not knowing the full extent of the damage that is being done to them because there are so few?   And you think I am uncaring?

Political BS has made it appear that trans people are a gigantic enemy. Nothing could be further from the truth.   They are not the enemy.   The enemy are those that push experimentation and drugs not made for the purpose they are being used to sterilize these kids who are so confused, they will latch on to anything that sounds like it might help them with their mental pain and anguish.   The enemy are those that want to make this mainstream, the mutilating of the human body.   It is disgusting and sick what they do to minors that suffer from this dysphoria. 

And, if you've noticed, the politicians have mostly stopped talking about trans entirely.   Yes they have and I am grateful that this effort has been stopped for the most part.   But make no mistake, they will start up again when the admin changes to something that supports their evil aspirations.  The sterilizing of children is evil.  

If you want to keep going on like a puppet who was trained by a political stunt - then you should keep going you puppet.   I could say the same for you.   I am on the side of science and biology.   Those that approve and seek to continue the emasculation of minors are disturbed disturbed and have no place in the conversation.   It is child abuse plain and simple to convince minors that this is an appropriate way to go, when all of the scientific studies show that their brains are not developed enough to consider the downstream effects of their decisions.   That is why we don't let 13 year olds drive, smoke, buy alcohol, gamble etc.  

I hope this helps you.   I am not against trans kids.   They need care and compassion and time to work through their feelings.   They are being abused by those that want to push them into life altering decisions that they are not emotionally or physically mature enough to make.  It is the adults that I am against.   The only exception to this is for boys to play sports against girls.   Boys to be in girls locker rooms and bathrooms.  The kids couldn't do this without adult approval, and that is on the adults.   No caring father of a daughter would want this to happen to their child.   It is inconceivable that this is the case but we see it all the time.  It is getting less often sure, but it should never have started in the first place. 

mspart

 

Edited by mspart
  • Bob 2
Posted
16 hours ago, Bigbrog said:

Not sure how you made the leap to mspart hating Trans as I didn't get that out of his post??

And by the way, who made trans people a huge topic considering how rare they actually are??

The "leap to mspart hating Trans..." - I didn't make that leap.

YOU MADE THAT LEAP.

At no point did I say that. Read the post again. It's not hard, only 3 posts up.

It's Lent, maybe choose to stop lying in your posts until Easter. It might do you some good.

  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, RockLobster said:

The "leap to mspart hating Trans..." - I didn't make that leap.

YOU MADE THAT LEAP.

At no point did I say that. Read the post again. It's not hard, only 3 posts up.

It's Lent, maybe choose to stop lying in your posts until Easter. It might do you some good.

LOL....what did you accuse mspart of?  And what you accused him of is completely false!

Posted (edited)

AI weighs in...

Let’s break this down based on the exchange and the concepts of "loser think" and "midwit" behaviorHa we’ve discussed.
 
@Sock Puppet's First Post (to @mspart )
  • "Maybe stick a sock in your trans care bullsh* posts. You don't personally care about any trans kids at all. Or for any trans people at all for that matter. You are incapable of understanding and empathizing with anybody who's profile doesn't fit in your small mind."**
  • Analysis: This is aggressive and accusatory, claiming mspart doesn’t care about trans people and lacks empathy. It’s not explicitly saying "hate," but it heavily implies disdain or prejudice through "small mind" and "bullsh*** posts." No real evidence is provided—just vibes and insults.
  • Loser think? Not quite. It’s not self-defeating or passive; it’s confrontational. Could be petty, though, if Rock Lobster’s just venting without substance.
  • Midwit behavior? Possibly. The post assumes a lot about mspart’s inner motives ("you don’t care") without backing it up, which can come off as performative cleverness—like trying to dunk on someone with a shallow moral flex. It’s not deep analysis; it’s a snipe.
 
@Bigbrog’s Response (to Rock Lobster):
  • "Not sure how you made the leap to mspart hating Trans as I didn't get that out of his post??"
  • Analysis: BigBrog interprets Rock Lobster’s post as implying mspart hates trans people, not just that he doesn’t care. This could be an honest misread or a subtle jab to put Rock Lobster on the defensive. Either way, it’s engaging with the subtext.
  • Loser think? No. It’s not defeatist—just questioning.
  • Midwit behavior? Eh, maybe a touch. If BigBrog’s deliberately misframing to score a gotcha, it’s a midwit flex—overanalyzing or twisting words to seem perceptive. But if it’s genuine confusion, it’s just a fair pushback.
 
Rock Lobster’s Reply (to BigBrog):
  • "The 'leap to mspart hating Trans...' - I didn't make that leap. YOU MADE THAT LEAP. At no point did I say that. Read the post again. It's not hard, only 3 posts up. It's Lent, maybe choose to stop lying in your posts until Easter. It might do you some good."
  • Analysis: Rock Lobster doubles down, denying the "hate" accusation was implied, and flips it back on BigBrog with a sanctimonious Lent reference. The caps ("YOU MADE THAT LEAP") and sarcasm ("It’s not hard") are defensive and snarky. It’s technically true they didn’t say "hate," but "incapable of understanding and empathizing" skirts close enough that BigBrog’s leap isn’t wild.
  • Loser think? Borderline. The defensiveness and pivot to moralizing ("stop lying until Easter") feel like a retreat into self-righteousness instead of engaging the point. It’s less about winning the argument and more about saving face.
  • Midwit behavior? Yes. The pedantic "I didn’t say that, YOU did" plus the Lent quip reeks of trying to sound clever while dodging the substance. It’s not a dumb take, but it’s not profound either—just smug wordplay.
 
Overall:
  • Rock Lobster: Leans midwit. The original post is a shallow attack, and the reply doubles down with performative wit instead of substance. The loser vibe creeps in with the defensive moral flexing—less about the issue, more about being right.
  • BigBrog: Mostly Neutral, but could dip into midwit if the "hating Trans" leap was a calculated strawman to trip up Rock Lobster. Otherwise, it’s just a reasonable callout.
  • The Exchange: No one’s really grappling with the core issue (whatever mspart posted about trans care). It’s all posturing and semantics—classic online slapfight. Midwit energy dominates because it’s more about looking sharp than saying anything useful. Loser think only peeks through in the retreat to petty jabs.
Edited by jross
  • Bob 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...