Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The new definition of "fraud" is anything that the wingers don't like. Everything is being re-defined with this administration and the mindless idiots just go along with everything diaper boy and President Musk say. 

$55 billion in savings. Yah; let's just believe that simply because he said it. Anybody with half a brain knew he was probably full of B.S. since he wasn't being transparent with the actual data. 

Edited by red viking
Posted
5 minutes ago, red viking said:

The new definition of "fraud" is anything that the wingers don't like.

Maybe make the same argument 3,000,000 times and people will come over to your side.   Wait.  You’ve already made this argument 4,000,000 times.   Persistent 

Posted

Is this what you are looking for?

https://freebeacon.com/trump-administration/billions-doge-found-parked-at-bank-earmarked-for-stacey-abrams-backed-green-group/

DOGE Finds $2 Billion in Taxpayer Funds Earmarked for Stacey Abrams-Linked Group

EPA chief Lee Zeldin says revelation 'extremely concerning'

DOGE discovered $2 billion in taxpayer funds set aside for a fledgling nonprofit linked to perennial Georgia Democratic candidate Stacey Abrams.

The Environmental Protection Agency under the Biden administration awarded Power Forward Communities the grant in April 2024 as part of the agency's Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund program. Power Forward Communities received the green energy grant despite the fact that it was founded months earlier in late 2023 and never managed anywhere near the grant's dollar figure—it reported just $100 in total revenue during its first three months in operation, according to its latest tax filings.

Power Forward Communities' grant was one of just eight Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund grants that the EPA doled out in April 2024 and that, altogether, totaled $20 billion. EPA administrator Lee Zeldin announced on Feb. 13 that his staff and Department of Government Efficiency officials discovered that the Biden administration parked that same $20 billion at an outside financial institution before leaving office, limiting the federal government's oversight of the program.

The revelation that Power Forward Communities is among the beneficiaries of the funds Zeldin's team located raises ethics questions about how the Biden administration selected recipients of such massive grants and whether it played favorites when doling those grants out. Abrams was a vocal proponent of the Biden administration's green energy agenda and campaigned for former vice president Kamala Harris.

How that for fraud?   Federal government supporting a democratic candidate and trying to hide it.   Isn't that the definition of fraud, doing something and trying to hide it?  Since when is it the duty of the federal to subsidize electoral candidates?  Or cronies?

mspart

 

Posted
Is this what you are looking for?
https://freebeacon.com/trump-administration/billions-doge-found-parked-at-bank-earmarked-for-stacey-abrams-backed-green-group/

DOGE Finds $2 Billion in Taxpayer Funds Earmarked for Stacey Abrams-Linked Group

EPA chief Lee Zeldin says revelation 'extremely concerning'

DOGE discovered $2 billion in taxpayer funds set aside for a fledgling nonprofit linked to perennial Georgia Democratic candidate Stacey Abrams.
The Environmental Protection Agency under the Biden administration awarded Power Forward Communities the grant in April 2024 as part of the agency's Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund program. Power Forward Communities received the green energy grant despite the fact that it was founded months earlier in late 2023 and never managed anywhere near the grant's dollar figure—it reported just $100 in total revenue during its first three months in operation, according to its latest tax filings.
Power Forward Communities' grant was one of just eight Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund grants that the EPA doled out in April 2024 and that, altogether, totaled $20 billion. EPA administrator Lee Zeldin announced on Feb. 13 that his staff and Department of Government Efficiency officials discovered that the Biden administration parked that same $20 billion at an outside financial institution before leaving office, limiting the federal government's oversight of the program.
The revelation that Power Forward Communities is among the beneficiaries of the funds Zeldin's team located raises ethics questions about how the Biden administration selected recipients of such massive grants and whether it played favorites when doling those grants out. Abrams was a vocal proponent of the Biden administration's green energy agenda and
for former vice president Kamala Harris.
How that for fraud?   Federal government supporting a democratic candidate and trying to hide it.   Isn't that the definition of fraud, doing something and trying to hide it?  Since when is it the duty of the federal to subsidize electoral candidates?  Or cronies?
mspart
 

So, any funds going to any organization that has a link to any political candidate is fraud?

That’s your definition of fraud?

How do you feel about taxpayer subsidies of O&G, who in turn, lobby state and federal representatives?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Abrams org never had control of 100 bucks but they were given 2 billion?   Malfeasance and fraud.   The money was not going to where "it was said to go to ".   Biden hid the money, they found the money, and it was not supposed to be found.  That's fraud.  Otherwise it wouldn't not have been hidden. 

mspart

Posted
1 hour ago, Le duke said:


So, any funds going to any organization that has a link to any political candidate is fraud?

That’s your definition of fraud?

How do you feel about taxpayer subsidies of O&G, who in turn, lobby state and federal representatives?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

i believe wingers call it dark money... unless it's for their candidate 

Posted
1 hour ago, Le duke said:

So, any funds going to any organization that has a link to any political candidate is fraud?

Tax dollars should not go to any political candidate ever period.  Repub or democrat.   To think this is ok is nonsense.  We should all be screaming for a refund for our taxes that are being wasted on garbage.  

Posted
3 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Tax dollars should not go to any political candidate ever period.  Repub or democrat.   To think this is ok is nonsense.  We should all be screaming for a refund for our taxes that are being wasted on garbage.  


This

mspart

Posted
3 hours ago, Scouts Honor said:

 

wow. this is precisely the quid pro quo sh!t that gotta stop.

energy, military, and pharmaceuticals are infested with it.

  • Bob 1

TBD

Posted
2 hours ago, Le duke said:


So, any funds going to any organization that has a link to any political candidate is fraud?

That’s your definition of fraud?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

play the semantics game all you want. it's covert (and partisan (either way)) misuse of government funds and it needs to be eradicated.

you know this, but when you're reduced to a losing position you go the semantic route. 

  • Bob 1

TBD

Posted
Tax dollars should not go to any political candidate ever period.  Repub or democrat.   To think this is ok is nonsense.  We should all be screaming for a refund for our taxes that are being wasted on garbage.  

Did any of the money go to her?

Bro, we paid for Donald Trump’s Secret Service security detail to stay at his properties for YEARS. Millions and millions of dollars. It’s still happening.

Are you OK with that?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
play the semantics game all you want. it's covert (and partisan (either way)) misuse of government funds and it needs to be eradicated.
you know this, but when you're reduced to a losing position you go the semantic route. 

How do you feel about the USSS paying tens of millions of dollars at Trump properties?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

well, he was a former president, a candidate who went through at least two assassination attempts, and now president again. it seems justified.

however, i do agree that USSS budget is filled with crap.

you know, like housing and protection that ran in the millions of dollars for cocaine-addicted pedophile money launderer Hunter Biden.

of the man who sprung a worldwide pandemic - Anthony Fauci. 

crazy, right. but trump, yeah.

TBD

Posted
well, he was a former president, a candidate who went through at least two assassination attempts, and now president again. it seems justified.
however, i do agree that USSS budget is filled with crap.
you know, like housing and protection that ran in the millions of dollars for cocaine-addicted pedophile money launderer Hunter Biden.
of the man who sprung a worldwide pandemic - Anthony Fauci. 
crazy, right. but trump, yeah.


Huh?

This happened in his first term.

In one instance, his hotel charged the USSS nearly 6x the government rate.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/madelinehalpert/2022/10/17/trumps-company-charged-secret-service-1185-per-night-to-stay-at-his-hotel-documents-show/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

i thought you were talking about USSS in the four years he was out of office.

yes, what you are referring to is absolutely effing ridiculous and shouldn't be approved.

that's a horrendous look for trump. surprised that isn't getting more run. 

TBD

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...