Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Offthemat said:

The theorem is based entirely on the concept of an infinite amount of monkeys, who are given an infinite amount of time.

The infinite part is integral to the point. (Statistics and such.)

Although, if anyone likes, there is room for customization.

It doesn't have to be monkeys - it could be goons, it could be loons, it could be racoons watching cartoons.

Posted
7 hours ago, jross said:

Trump was not a politician and did not know what he didn't know.  He explained this in the Rogan interview.  He admits his mistakes.  Now that he understands, he's assembled a team ahead of time.

You must not have watched that Rogan interview. He admits in the interview that he hasn't assembled a team at all.

But you are right that he is unqualified as a politician at any level, and has no business trying to pretend to be President again (other than to try to keep himself out of jail.)

Posted
5 hours ago, Offthemat said:

Anybody who claims that Trump would damage this country in any way in order to aid Putin or Russia has the intelligence of a fence post. 

It's may be subtle - but, I would say you're wrong. Let me edit your line a bit and we can revisit it.

Trump would damage this country in many ways in order to make a considerable personal profit for him , even if it meant that it would aid Putin or Russia in the process.

To this statement, I would agree 100% According to recent polls, 100% of fence posts also agree.

  • Bob 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Caveira said:

I posted this somewhere earlier.  It’s amazing that in the digital age…. where we can see what they say…. When they say.    Where they are has not changed much.   I wonder if that’s why they want censorship.  

It shouldn't surprise you. Trump wants to ban books and censor his opponents (or worse.)

Trump is the oldest Presidential candidate in the history of the country (beats Biden by a couple years.)

He's old, senile, stubborn, and full of hate toward strong women and minorities and many other things he likes to ramble on about at his silly little rallies that some low IQ people seem to want to attend. (They feel a low IQ bond with Trump.)

Basically every one who has ever had a personal part in Trump's last presidency has either ditched him (his own family included) or come out against him for this election (most everyone he's hired.)

It's simple. Even his own family, who know him best, have ditched him. Trump is a loser. 

  • Bob 1
  • Haha 1
  • Clown 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, headshuck said:

TDS is real.

Or just having common sense to not vote for a racist, sexist philandering asshole who has shown himself ill suited to lead anything. 

  • Bob 2
Posted
7 hours ago, RockLobster said:

that some low IQ people seem to want to attend.

Isn't it crazy that these bitter clinging deplorable nazi-loving garbage low IQ (BCDN-LGLIQs) people have figured out how to get picture IDs, register, and vote?  And thereby one by one get to cancel out the votes of brilliant lefties who know what is better for them.  If those BCDN-LGLIQs would just shut up and do what brilliant leftists tell them then the earth would be cooler (or warmer as needed) and war would end and the perfect number of calories would magically be in every person's belly upon demand.  Darn those BCDN-LGLIQs!

Posted
9 minutes ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

This from an anonymous account.

lolol

Brother you just don’t want the main forum to know you’re a political crazy person.   Two levels of anonymization is weird.  They’ll call you out there if you did.  

  • Clown 2
Posted
12 minutes ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

Lots of people who hate the US feel this way.

Fantastic.  2 years is a bargain.

 

Posted
17 hours ago, jross said:

I’ll be honest: if the censorship party wins or if this election is even close, I’ll need to take some personal time off work. I’ve never felt so disheartened or had such a low opinion of people in my own country. I think I’ll just go touch some grass.

I am with you. I will need to be off of social media for a while. Going to have to take a step back and appreciate my family and those around me more despite the American hating POS in office.

  • Bob 1
  • Haha 2
Posted

The biggest shame in all of this is that politics and government and citizens electing their leaders has gotten to a place where people feel that way.  And that's not an indictment toward anyone feels that way, but rather on the climate surrounding us.  I still hold that whoever wins the Presidential ballot tomorrow, on the pie chart of ingredients that actually impact my day to day life, and my ability to continue to advance my life, is a small slice.  

  • Bob 1
Posted
9 hours ago, RockLobster said:

It shouldn't surprise you. Trump wants to ban books and censor his opponents (or worse.)

Where did he ever say that?

Trump is the oldest Presidential candidate in the history of the country (beats Biden by a couple years.)

Age now all of a sudden matters? If he gets to where he walks past a plane down a runway we can talk.

He's old, senile, stubborn, and full of hate toward strong women and minorities and many other things he likes to ramble on about at his silly little rallies that some low IQ people seem to want to attend. (They feel a low IQ bond with Trump.)

Tulsi Gabbard, Danica Patrick, Brittany Mahomes, Vivek, Ben Carson, Kanye, Kodak Black, Roseanne, 50 Cent, Antonio Brown, Lil Wayne, etc have all endorsed him so not every strong women or minority buys the crap the libs are selling.

Basically every one who has ever had a personal part in Trump's last presidency has either ditched him (his own family included) or come out against him for this election (most everyone he's hired.)

Tim Walz's own family thinks he's a fruitcake. 

It's simple. Even his own family, who know him best, have ditched him. Trump is a loser. 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, WrestlingRasta said:

The biggest shame in all of this is that politics and government and citizens electing their leaders has gotten to a place where people feel that way.  And that's not an indictment toward anyone feels that way, but rather on the climate surrounding us.  I still hold that whoever wins the Presidential ballot tomorrow, on the pie chart of ingredients that actually impact my day to day life, and my ability to continue to advance my life, is a small slice.  

One can only hope it's over by tomorrow but we will be lucky if they have all the votes by Friday since there isn't a cutoff.

  • Bob 2
Posted
13 hours ago, RockLobster said:

The theorem is based entirely on the concept of an infinite amount of monkeys, who are given an infinite amount of time.

The infinite part is integral to the point. (Statistics and such.)

Although, if anyone likes, there is room for customization.

It doesn't have to be monkeys - it could be goons, it could be loons, it could be racoons watching cartoons.

How does this new revelation that monkeys could not do the works of Shakespeare given an infinite amount of time reflect on the theory of evolution.   Is not life much more complicated than the works of the Bard? 

mspart

 

Posted
14 hours ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

And you weirdos can't fathom why women aren't voting for the GOP.

"It's a conundrum!"

It’s her husband, dunce.  

  • Clown 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...