Trump Canceling Interviews Because He’s Exhausted

[Bigbrog]

32 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

As per usual, I am not interested in going back and resurfacing things I’ve already read or looked into, and coming here to provide to people who don’t want to take the time.  You just said you haven’t, and instead want me to provide the many examples for you.  You and I have discussed this before, I’m not into that. I’m into encouraging people to make the effort to educate themselves, instead of relying on an anonymous message board poster.  
 

There are plenty examples over the last few months of each description you stated.  And before you get into the usual  “you just hate Trump”, you may recall I was saying the same thing about Biden. Neither is anywhere near fit to be President. 

Was truly interested as all the things I have watched and/or read (even the left leaning sites) I have never come across Trump exhibiting any of the things I mentioned about Biden...but yes, you are right, you aren't interested in engaging and backing up things you say...I'll remember that the next time Rasta...enjoy your pot and your meat.

[WrestlingRasta]

33 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

Was truly interested as all the things I have watched and/or read (even the left leaning sites) I have never come across Trump exhibiting any of the things I mentioned about Biden...but yes, you are right, you aren't interested in engaging and backing up things you say...I'll remember that the next time Rasta...enjoy your pot and your meat.

If I wasn't interested in engaging, I wouldn't be on the site.   What I have clearly demonstrated to you, several several times, is I am not interested in going back to dig up 'evidence' (a popular term on an anonymous message board for some reason), for people who are not interested in taking up the time themselves.

 

You said yourself in the previous response, maybe you missed something because you don't tune in, (even though after I brought that up, you changed to "all the things I have watched and read, even the left leaning sites.....interesting change) and you want me to provide that information for you.  Your stance is that it's up to me to provide knowledge to you.  You shouldn't have to 'remember that next time' because you and I have been through this several times before.   No, I'm not that interested in 'backing things up'.  I don't know how more clearly I can make it that I am not interested in an anonymous person relying on an anonymous message board poster, I prefer people take the effort, with an open mind, themselves.   I mean, I have literally spelled that out for you in the past, more than once, how is it so hard to remember?

 

PS- My pot, and my meat, are top notch and for many many to enjoy.

Edited October 24 by WrestlingRasta

[Scouts Honor]

i quote

"President Joe Biden insists that he hasn’t made up his mind whether to run for a second term. But the public sure has.

Almost three in four Americans (72%) said that they do not want Biden to run again in 2024, according to a new national Marquette Law School poll released on Thursday, a striking number – especially when you consider that Biden’s approval rating in the same poll was relatively solid (for him) at 45%.

It’s not then that large swaths of the American public think Biden is doing a terrible job and want him out. It’s just that people – across the political spectrum – don’t want him to run again in two years’ time."

 

OK so they broke it into 3 graphs...

fine.

[Danny Deck]

Are you reading the full sentence that you partially bolded incorrectly?

[Bigbrog]

3 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said:

If I wasn't interested in engaging, I wouldn't be on the site.   What I have clearly demonstrated to you, several several times, is I am not interested in going back to dig up 'evidence' (a popular term on an anonymous message board for some reason), for people who are not interested in taking up the time themselves.

 

You said yourself in the previous response, maybe you missed something because you don't tune in, (even though after I brought that up, you changed to "all the things I have watched and read, even the left leaning sites.....interesting change) and you want me to provide that information for you.  Your stance is that it's up to me to provide knowledge to you.  You shouldn't have to 'remember that next time' because you and I have been through this several times before.   No, I'm not that interested in 'backing things up'.  I don't know how more clearly I can make it that I am not interested in an anonymous person relying on an anonymous message board poster, I prefer people take the effort, with an open mind, themselves.   I mean, I have literally spelled that out for you in the past, more than once, how is it so hard to remember?

 

PS- My pot, and my meat, are top notch and for many many to enjoy.

Got it...you spew things with nothing to back it up because you're "not interested in backing things up"...got it...again apparently.  My bad for thinking people who make claims about certain things would have the sources to back up those claims, even when asked in a nice and sincere manner because a person is unable to find it themselves.  And guess what, I don't need to remember what you told me because I will continually ask people on here to provide evidence of their claims when I am unable to find evidence of said claim...guess you can choose to engage or not...based on what you said I'll anticipate you not responding when I ask.  

 

[WrestlingRasta]

58 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

Got it...you spew things with nothing to back it up because you're "not interested in backing things up"...got it...again apparently.  My bad for thinking people who make claims about certain things would have the sources to back up those claims, even when asked in a nice and sincere manner because a person is unable to find it themselves.  And guess what, I don't need to remember what you told me because I will continually ask people on here to provide evidence of their claims when I am unable to find evidence of said claim...guess you can choose to engage or not...based on what you said I'll anticipate you not responding when I ask.  

 

Well, I mean, obviously I respond. How else would we get into these conversations?  It’s doing the work I’ve already done for you, so that you can just rely on anonymous people, that I  won’t do. 

[Caveira]

1 hour ago, Bigbrog said:

you spew things with nothing to back it up

Reminds me of this interview.   It is gold

 

 

[mspart]

Musk totally took it to that tool.   The tool got gotcha'd by the guy he wanted to gotcha. 

Do you notice how much the tool sounded like Karma-la?  Gets caught where he doesn't have an answer and pivots to something else.  Musk was perfectly respectful the whole time and was enjoying himself.   The tool was backpeddalling in an appalling manner.   very similar to what we have seen from Karma-la in her softball interviews the last few days.

mspart

Edited October 24 by mspart

[Caveira]

37 minutes ago, mspart said:

Musk totally took it to that tool.   The tool got gotcha'd by the guy he wanted to gotcha. 

Do you notice how much the tool sounded like Karma-la?  Gets caught where he doesn't have an answer and pivots to something else.  Musk was perfectly respectful the whole time and was enjoying himself.   The tool was backpeddalling in an appalling manner.   very similar to what we have seen from Karma-la in her softball interviews the last few days.

mspart

Musk and the don lemon interview on free speech is a good one too.   

[ionel]

1 minute ago, Caveira said:

Musk and the don lemon interview on free speech is a good one too.   

Where is Don?  Has Barack shamed him into voting for Kamala? 

[Bigbrog]

4 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Well, I mean, obviously I respond. How else would we get into these conversations?  It’s doing the work I’ve already done for you, so that you can just rely on anonymous people, that I  won’t do. 

Umm...what??  You did absolutely no work other than say opinions with nothing to back it up.

[WrestlingRasta]

7 hours ago, Bigbrog said:

Umm...what??  You did absolutely no work other than say opinions with nothing to back it up.

Ohhhhhh I see. You must have mistaken ‘doing the work’ as if having something to do with this anonymous message board.  Let me clear up that little confusion. 
 

Tip: this board is not that vital to the operation of society.  There is no evidence necessary, there are no decisions made here that impact society in any way.  There is no obligation to back anything up.  What happens here affects nothing. 
 

And it certainly isn’t work. 

[Bigbrog]

5 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Ohhhhhh I see. You must have mistaken ‘doing the work’ as if having something to do with this anonymous message board.  Let me clear up that little confusion. 
 

Tip: this board is not that vital to the operation of society.  There is no evidence necessary, there are no decisions made here that impact society in any way.  There is no obligation to back anything up.  What happens here affects nothing. 
 

And it certainly isn’t work. 

It appears the only confusion is on your part so not sure who you are giving the "Tip" to??  And your "Tip" is like trying to explain that the sky is blue and water is wet...like no snit Sherlock.  Bottom line is you spew things as fact and don't back them up...again, a lot of people on here do that.  I like to ask people where they get the information they are basing their opinions on when I can't find it.  You for some reason will never supply that...again fine...it's a message board and this is where people like to act and talk like they know things as facts when 90% of the time they are just pulling stuff out of their butts...so carry on.

[WrestlingRasta]

1 hour ago, Bigbrog said:

it's a message board and this is where people like to act and talk like they know things as facts when 90% of the time they are just pulling stuff out of their butts

You forgot: and refuse to be open to anything or seek out anything that that may disrupt their pre-determined side's views.

Edited October 25 by WrestlingRasta

[Offthemat]

Potkettleism. 

[WrestlingRasta]

10 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

Potkettleism. 

Do I go with my pre-determined side's views......or do I ride the fence and can't take a stance.  You're going to have to make up your mind.  The changing back and forth is unbecoming (you seem to have a hard time making up your mind on something when your media can't tell you what to think about it)

[Bigbrog]

2 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said:

You forgot: and refuse to be open to anything or seek out anything that that may disrupt their pre-determined side's views.

Are you saying that to me, or to yourself??

By the way I did and do seek out both sides of things and claims people make about each candidate, or claims people make about anything...however, when I can't find what people claim, I ask them to show me where they got their information from, you know, to learn...however, when they can't, or in your case you refuse because you think you are making some sort of ideological stance about something, I know they are full of snit and just spew partisan rhetoric and stupid headline talking points without any basis of actual truth or facts.

[WrestlingRasta]

37 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

Are you saying that to me, or to yourself??

By the way I did and do seek out both sides of things and claims people make about each candidate, or claims people make about anything..

I wasn’t saying that about your or me, just in general (remember when you said “Rasta is actually very equal opportunity” when it comes to these things?  Is that only your opinion when you agree with me? We know you ‘mic drop’ when you agree with me but take a totally different tune when you don’t). 
 

As for the rest, I guess I got confused with how your input evolved during our conversation from “ I don’t really tune in because he’s cringe” at the beginning, to the full deep dive to seek out that you explain above now.  You can see where that might be confusing.  Again, as with my other friend above, it would be a lot easier to converse with yall if you stayed on even your own path.  
 

Have a great weekend.  Till next time. 

[Offthemat]

 

[Lipdrag]

On 10/23/2024 at 3:19 PM, Scouts Honor said:

no ... most people were fine with biden.

then something happened...

How could 81 million people be wrong? 

Biden was obviously a burden to himself and others during the 2020 campaign so he was locked up in a basement and ran on the platform of being not Trump and the tactic of Dem AGs illegally ignoring election laws and the courts deferring out of fear or ruling that American citizens have no standing to access the courts to enforce the laws in an American election - mostly in the main swing states.  

[Lipdrag]

On 10/23/2024 at 7:04 PM, Danny Deck said:

A remarkable number of people don’t want Joe Biden to run again | CNN Politics

Yet 81 million of them "voted" for him less than 2 years previously.  Fickle, fickle, dems.