Trumps classified Documents Case Dismissed

[red viking]

11 minutes ago, Paul158 said:

Last sentence.  It doesn't apply if you are old and feeble. It doesn't apply if you are a nice likeable guy and have a poor memory.

Will Hunter Biden's case get thrown out now? I believe that was a special counsel too. Nah. That corrupt judge was careful to make sure her particular reasoning (not being confirmed by the Senate) didn't apply to Biden's special counsel. 

Edited July 17 by red viking

[Paul158]

3 minutes ago, red viking said:

Will Hunter Biden's case get thrown out now? I believe that was a special counsel too. 

Was the special council properly selected according to the law? If not it would get dismissed.

[ionel]

22 minutes ago, red viking said:

I don't see much evidence for that personally, but I wouldn't put it past the GOP, in general, to do whatever it takes to win.

But you are missing the beauty of convicting folks on a public forum.  You don't personally have to see or believe the evidence, we only need one poster for that and think we already found him.  Its so much more efficient than following the law.  

[ThreePointTakedown]

On 7/15/2024 at 1:46 PM, braves121 said:

What crime has Biden committed?

You know they won't/can't answer that question. 

Without looking like a jewish-space-laser nutjob. 

[Bigbrog]

6 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

You know they won't/can't answer that question. 

Without looking like a jewish-space-laser nutjob. 

The irony of you claiming someone won't answer a question...LOL

[ThreePointTakedown]

14 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

The irony of you claiming someone won't answer a question...LOL

Put up or shut up. 

[Bigbrog]

12 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

Put up or shut up. 

Looking in the mirror when posting again hey?!?!

Name one thing the VP has done that you like??

[ThreePointTakedown]

2 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

Looking in the mirror when posting again hey?!?!

Name one thing the VP has done that you like??

Asking more questions doesn't prove your previous point. Until you provide evidence that I did not answer all your previous questions and because you are so dishonest I will refuse to answer your questions until you meet my standard. Any refusal, deflection, or obfuscation will be considered your confession of being a liar and a coward. 

Best of luck, cliche. 

But I'm happy to ask more that I know you can't answer: Do you understand the responsibilities of the VP and what are they? Who is third in line(that's 4th to people who don't understand simple things) in presidential succession? 

[Offthemat]

1 hour ago, red viking said:

DOJ has been operating under the same guidelines and laws for 25 years now re: special counsels. How interesting that a Trump-appointed judge now says it is illegal on the day of Trump's nomination. Great timing. This was a slam dunk case and Trump's only hope was to get it thrown out on a technicality. The merits of the case were slam-dunk and everybody in this country should be disappointed in how this has gone. Anybody responsible for a crime should be held accountable. 

Nothing to see here....move along. 

The Special Counsel appointment hasn’t been brought before the Supreme Court so the arguments for and against it haven’t been decided.  When district and appeals courts have different opinions on laws they usually get decided at the Supreme Court.  Judge Cannon decided that two problems were at issue with Smith’s appointment.  First, he had never been confirmed as a Principal Officer, as all the other Special Counsels had, and second; Congress had not appropriated the money to pay for his office.  
 

Judge Cannon has significant support for her decision, from law professors, to two former U.S. Attorneys General, to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.  Thomas wrote in the Immunities decision that before the court worried that the President had immunity, it needed to verify Smith’s authority.  She did, and now it’s up to Smith to prove he’s authorized to bring the case.  To better understand this case you may want to familiarize yourself with the Constitution and the definition of Principal and Inferior Officers. And the Appropriations Clause. 

[mspart]

On 7/15/2024 at 10:44 AM, braves121 said:

There is a 2 tiered justice system for sure if any of us plebs on the board had classified documents laying out we would be rotting in prison but the person who appointed the judge presiding over his case has no repercussions this country is such a joke lmao

You might look at Biden and Hillary.   Are they rotting in prison.   There is a two tiered justice system.   And it has nothing to do with who appointed who. 

mspart