Do NOT Oppose Israel's Agenda Or THIS Will Happen

[Wrestleknownothing]

2 hours ago, Scouts Honor said:

crime reporting is lower.

not the rate of actual crime.

 

How do you prove the negative?

[Offthemat]

37 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

How do you prove the negative?

https://abc7news.com/gov-gavin-newsom-at-target-ca-retail-theft-shoplifting/14379506/

[Wrestleknownothing]

8 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

https://abc7news.com/gov-gavin-newsom-at-target-ca-retail-theft-shoplifting/14379506/

Reporting on a crime does not demonstrate under-reporting of crime.

[Offthemat]

2 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Reporting on a crime does not demonstrate under-reporting of crime.

That’s a stupid remark.  Do you think reporting through media is equivalent to making a police report?  Or are you trying to be clever?  

[Wrestleknownothing]

13 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

That’s a stupid remark.  Do you think reporting through media is equivalent to making a police report?  Or are you trying to be clever?  

Your inability to understand (repeatedly) does not make the comment stupid. I will use more words so hopefully you will understand. This report about a crime does not demonstrate that crimes are not being reported to the authorities. Nowhere in the article is there a claim that this crime was not reported to the police. The article is mute on the point. The only claim Newsom made in this dubious story is that a retail clerk failed to stop a crime. He fails to point out he did nothing to stop the crime either. More likely is this is something he made up to make a point. Either way it still does not prove, or even attempt to prove, the negative.

[Le duke]

That’s a stupid remark.  Do you think reporting through media is equivalent to making a police report?  Or are you trying to be clever?  

You should probably stop talking.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ohio Elite]

6 minutes ago, Le duke said:

You should probably stop talking.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Says the guy who's every other post in any thread is "Penn states probably gonna blank em"

Do us all a favor and STFU.

[Le duke]

Says the guy who's every other post in any thread is "Penn states probably gonna blank em"
Do us all a favor and STFU.

If the “evidence” he provides is not evidence for the point he’s trying to make (see Gavin Newsome post above), he should stop trying to make it something it’s not.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Offthemat]

13 hours ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Your inability to understand (repeatedly) does not make the comment stupid. I will use more words so hopefully you will understand. This report about a crime does not demonstrate that crimes are not being reported to the authorities. Nowhere in the article is there a claim that this crime was not reported to the police. The article is mute on the point. The only claim Newsom made in this dubious story is that a retail clerk failed to stop a crime. He fails to point out he did nothing to stop the crime either. More likely is this is something he made up to make a point. Either way it still does not prove, or even attempt to prove, the negative.

 

4 hours ago, Le duke said:

You should probably stop talking.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Common sense isn’t necessarily ubiquitous.  I had to laugh at the remark to a “13 hours ago” quote to “stop talking.”

[mspart]

My daughter works at Walgreens.   They cannot stop shoplifters even when they see them.   The most they can do is call the Sheriff or Police and have a no trespassing citation against the perp.   If they see them in the store again, they call the police again and the guys gets escorted out if he/she hasn't left already. 

Otherwise, they do not report any shoplifting crimes.   They cannot stop shoplifting crimes as that is against company policy.   The perps know where they stand.   Shoplift and go.   No problem.   It is the way it is in countless communities. 

mspart

[Scouts Honor]

but crime is down!!

[mspart]

Oh yes, I meant to say that!!  ha ha.    Businesses are not going under because crime is down. 

mspart

[JimmyBT]

On 7/4/2024 at 1:58 PM, Offthemat said:

 

Common sense isn’t necessarily ubiquitous.  I had to laugh at the remark to a “13 hours ago” quote to “stop talking.”

 

On 7/4/2024 at 12:16 AM, Wrestleknownothing said:

Your inability to understand (repeatedly) does not make the comment stupid. I will use more words so hopefully you will understand. This report about a crime does not demonstrate that crimes are not being reported to the authorities. Nowhere in the article is there a claim that this crime was not reported to the police. The article is mute on the point. The only claim Newsom made in this dubious story is that a retail clerk failed to stop a crime. He fails to point out he did nothing to stop the crime either. More likely is this is something he made up to make a point. Either way it still does not prove, or even attempt to prove, the negative.

Retail crime alone proves it’s not being reported.  There are videos of crimes all over the country that aren’t being reported as nothing will be done about it.  

[Lipdrag]

On 7/8/2024 at 11:08 PM, mspart said:

Oh yes, I meant to say that!!  ha ha.    Businesses are not going under because crime is down. 

mspart

Businesses are going under because crime is down.  When private property is not protected and taking it at will is not a crime then businesses go under BECAUSE “crime” is down.