Hammerlock3 Posted June 30 Posted June 30 45 minutes ago, AgaveMaria said: https://newrepublic.com/post/174448/judge-e-jean-carroll-case-yes-donald-trump-rapist It is a matter of Character. Not being one but showing a lack of. "you give the horrible impression of someone who has never read any of the counter arguments to their position" 1 "Half measures are a coward's form of insanity."
MPhillips Posted June 30 Posted June 30 21 minutes ago, Hammerlock3 said: "you give the horrible impression of someone who has never read any of the counter arguments to their position" Whose quote is this? .
Hammerlock3 Posted June 30 Posted June 30 3 minutes ago, MPhillips said: Whose quote is this? christopher hitchens to clown hannity 1 "Half measures are a coward's form of insanity."
Camel Wrestling Fan Posted June 30 Posted June 30 On 6/27/2024 at 8:46 PM, BigRedFan said: Really? What's this? Did he mock his appearance? No, mocked his memory and his reporting. Because he has a disability does not mean he is beyond reproach. If anything, the reporter should be happy he was treated equally as others. Look how often Trump, Biden, and Pelosi are mocked. Remember all the Trump balloons over emphasizing his weight? Pelosi with her contorted, plastic face? Biden open mouth breathing empty stare? Stevie Wonder memes? Only one group gets their panties in a wad and can not let it roll of their backs. McCain was not called a loser just for getting captured. He was called a loser for his political views and the decades of actions since entering the political field. 1
jackwebster Posted June 30 Posted June 30 5 minutes ago, Camel Wrestling Fan said: Only one group gets their panties in a wad and can not let it roll of their back. “I do whine because I want to win and I’m not happy about not winning and I am a whiner and I keep whining and whining until I win."
jross Posted June 30 Posted June 30 On 6/27/2024 at 4:09 PM, TNwrestling said: well...he most certainly DID mock a disabled reporter Can you see that you've been duped? https://www.catholics4trump.com/even-more-video-evidence-trump-did-not-mock-reporters-disability/
Caveira Posted June 30 Author Posted June 30 The media would never lie to you to keep their narrative going. This guy is in tip top condition. That par3 with a 265 yard carry over water…. And a small fast green. No problem man. He has that club in his bag I promise you.
Camel Wrestling Fan Posted June 30 Posted June 30 On 6/26/2024 at 12:09 PM, TNwrestling said: The guy cheated on his pregnant wife with a porn star, then used campaign funds to pay her to stay quiet. Banned people of a certain religion from entering the country, pushed a lie saying the election was stolen and rigged that sent his craziest followers to the capitol to off the vice president and speaker, said fallen soldiers and pow's are "losers", mocked a disabled reporter, obstructed an investigation into Russian interference, then pardoned his buddies who were listed as conspiring against the country from said investigation, withheld funds approved by congress to a foreign ally in hopes they'd hold investigations against his pollical rival, told the governor of a state to "find him votes" so he'd win the state...etc etc etc You, "You just have TDS". Good lord you guys are thick. Maybe...juuuuust maybe, the guy sucks. Edit: thank you @Rassling for proving my point with your reaction So you think Biden is somehow better human than Trump? Trump cheated on his pregnant wife with a porn star? Says the porn star, who blackmailed Trump! Biden cheated on his wife too with a married woman. Says who? Jill's at the time husband! Trump banned certain religions from entering our country? No, factually incorrect. He banned ppl from certain countries from entering our country that were predominantly Muslim. Not all muslin countries and not all Muslims. He also banned ppl from China which is not Muslim. Agree or disagree with the ban, but it was not a Muslim ban. Pushed a "stolen, rigged election? That is a talking point. There were so many irregularities MANY rational people would call it stolen or rigged. (But courts said... we all saw what courts can do in the case against Trump in the misclassification campaign contribution vs legal expense case). Mathematical impossibilities of some of the overnight vote imports and so many more. "Find votes" is not a call to change votes or anything nefarious. Simply, find illegal votes counted, votes not counted, miscalculated tabulation, or whatever. Scrutinize everything to find enough to restore Trump's lead is not asking anyone to cheat. "Find votes" is not a call to cheat. It is a call to seek out; discover. "sent his craziest followers to the capitol to off the vice president and speaker," I think his speech was just the opposite "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard." Read the entire speech here: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.npr.org/2021/02/10/966396848/read-trumps-jan-6-speech-a-key-part-of-impeachment-trial&ved=2ahUKEwjp2-CUkYSHAxV4SzABHaCzCFMQFnoECBsQAQ&usg=AOvVaw1nh4XqvOD0-jD-nwRjXzm5 withheld funds to an ally, to investigate... ? that is rich. Biden's famous "Son of B" they fired him" to stop the investigation into the company his son was on the BOD. One was an impeachable offense and one was a nothing burger?? 1 1 1
jackwebster Posted June 30 Posted June 30 23 minutes ago, Caveira said: The media would never lie to you to keep their narrative going. This guy is in tip top condition. The NYT eds said he should drop out. The NYT.
Caveira Posted June 30 Author Posted June 30 17 minutes ago, jackwebster said: The NYT eds said he should drop out. The NYT. This NYT? I think we’re agreeing btw….. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/28/opinion/kamala-harris-biden-debate.html This vid is good though…. Media / coworkers pre and post debate It’s sort of hilarious in a not so funny circus kind of way. https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTNjv5cr5/
jackwebster Posted June 30 Posted June 30 5 minutes ago, Caveira said: This NYT? I think we’re agreeing btw….. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/28/opinion/kamala-harris-biden-debate.html This vid is good though…. Media / coworkers pre and post debate It’s sort of hilarious in a not so funny circus kind of way. https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTNjv5cr5/ Your point was that the MSM was carrying Biden's water. My point was that the MSM flagship abandoned Biden, I.e. not carry g his water. Then you posted some stuff about the VP.
Caveira Posted June 30 Author Posted June 30 20 minutes ago, jackwebster said: Your point was that the MSM was carrying Biden's water. My point was that the MSM flagship abandoned Biden, I.e. not carry g his water. Then you posted some stuff about the VP. That’s fair. Carry on.
Idaho Posted July 1 Posted July 1 (edited) 5 hours ago, jackwebster said: The NYT eds said he should drop out. The NYT. Haha....it really doesn't really mean much to your argument. He did his damage for 3 1/2 years and they protected him. Their job is done and completed. Now they have to abandon him and put the pressure on for him to drop out because they know if he doesn't he will lose the election. Edited July 1 by Idaho 1 Sponsored by INTERMAT
BigRedFan Posted July 1 Posted July 1 6 hours ago, jackwebster said: The NYT eds said he should drop out. The NYT. The Philadelphia Inquirer eds said that Trump should drop out. Time to switch subscriptions!
Hammerlock3 Posted July 1 Posted July 1 15 minutes ago, BigRedFan said: The Philadelphia Inquirer eds said that Trump should drop out. Time to switch subscriptions! if that was true and philadelphia inquirer was the thought leader for a political movement you would have a point (but on not planet is this funny) 1 "Half measures are a coward's form of insanity."
Offthemat Posted July 1 Posted July 1 6 hours ago, jackwebster said: The NYT eds said he should drop out. The NYT. His condition has been obvious since before he took office. By not covering it, they just participated in disenfranchising millions of dimocrat voters who’ll have no say in who their candidate is, if he drops out before the election. 1
Hammerlock3 Posted July 1 Posted July 1 28 minutes ago, Offthemat said: His condition has been obvious since before he took office. By not covering it, they just participated in disenfranchising millions of dimocrat voters who’ll have no say in who their candidate is, if he drops out before the election. i'm just encouraged they changed the narrative at all. i thought cnn was gonna say biden won. 1 1 "Half measures are a coward's form of insanity."
jackwebster Posted July 1 Posted July 1 (edited) 7 hours ago, Offthemat said: His condition has been obvious since before he took office. By not covering it, they just participated in disenfranchising millions of dimocrat voters who’ll have no say in who their candidate is, if he drops out before the election. Word, but you're moving the goal posts re my argument with Caviar(?). We were arguing about whether "they" would continue to push "their narrative." Caviar said "they" would; I said the NYT had already changed it. Whether the NYT f*ed over America by backing and continuing to back Biden in the face of mounting evidence that he's incompetent, I can't disagree. But, then again, I don't read the NYT everyday, or the Bulwark, or the Nation, or the New Republic, or any other anti-Trump outlet. However, I think I can empathize with their situation: They backed the only dude -- and it had to be a dude ... an old dude ... and an old white dude --- who could beat that lunatic. (What? You wanted them to endorse Kamala Harris so that she could get eaten alive by the racist-misogynist set?) So they did. But, the Faustian bargain played out like Faustian bargains are wont to do. So, it looks like that lunatic is going do what he does, and the Peter Thiels of the world are gonna laugh, laugh, laugh ... though, frankly, I don't think Peter Thiel laughs. Edited July 1 by jackwebster
jackwebster Posted July 1 Posted July 1 12 minutes ago, BigRedFan said: That sure is some tasty Kool-Aid you folks are drinking. Cliche away!
D3 for LU Posted July 1 Posted July 1 14 minutes ago, BigRedFan said: That sure is some tasty Kool-Aid you folks are drinking. Indeed... Trumpers will trump... uh-bump, dump. D3 Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.
D3 for LU Posted July 1 Posted July 1 5 minutes ago, jackwebster said: Cliche away! Okay, if you say so... D3 Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.
jackwebster Posted July 1 Posted July 1 9 minutes ago, D3 for LU said: Okay, if you say so... D3 Real question: What does this image communicate to Trump fans? Are they inspired by his look of defiance? Are they incensed by the possibility that the orange-scale has been manipulated? Do they envy his "fine golden hair"?
BigRedFan Posted July 1 Posted July 1 10 minutes ago, jackwebster said: Real question: What does this image communicate to Trump fans? Are they inspired by his look of defiance? Are they incensed by the possibility that the orange-scale has been manipulated? Do they envy his "fine golden hair"? You are asking for logic and/or reasoning from people who pay cash dollars for t-shirts with this picture and the tagline "Never Surrender", when the photo is from when he actually surrendered? From a group with a website "catholics4trump" that supports the most non-Catholic human being and belittles the second *actual* Catholic President? Good luck with that. 1 2
Offthemat Posted July 1 Posted July 1 (edited) 2 hours ago, jackwebster said: Word, but you're moving the goal posts re my argument with Caviar(?). We were arguing about whether "they" would continue to push "their narrative." Caviar said "they" would; I said the NYT had already changed it. Whether the NYT f*ed over America by backing and continuing to back Biden in the face of mounting evidence that he's incompetent, I can't disagree. But, then again, I don't read the NYT everyday, or the Bulwark, or the Nation, or the New Republic, or any other anti-Trump outlet. However, I think I can empathize with their situation: They backed the only dude -- and it had to be a dude ... an old dude ... and an old white dude --- who could beat that lunatic. (What? You wanted them to endorse Kamala Harris so that she could get eaten alive by the racist-misogynist set?) So they did. But, the Faustian bargain played out like Faustian bargains are wont to do. So, it looks like that lunatic is going do what he does, and the Peter Thiels of the world are gonna laugh, laugh, laugh ... though, frankly, I don't think Peter Thiel laughs. Yeah, there’s still time to wax and wane. In the meantime, a tip of the hat for Dean Phillips. Edited July 1 by Offthemat 1
Conor Delaney Rumson Fair Haven, New Jersey Class of 2025 Committed to Princeton Projected Weight: 197
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now