Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 5/31/2024 at 12:28 AM, VakAttack said:
Expand  

Ok the checks appear to match up with one or two vouchers or invoices.  Can anyone take one specific counts combination of check and invoice/voucher and explain what was false or falsified?  Thanks in advance.  

.

Posted
  On 5/31/2024 at 12:28 AM, VakAttack said:
Expand  

Accounting errors?  Those can be a misdemeanor, with a two year statute of limitations.  Our resident lawyer doesn’t even understand the novel law that he was convicted of.  Can’t name it and can’t explain it.  
 

It’s astonishing to see the actions of the people who can’t see the Republic coming to an end.  

  • Bob 1
Posted
  On 5/31/2024 at 12:28 AM, VakAttack said:
Expand  

Someone that comes to an anonymous wrestling non topics message board to ask that question is not seeking that information, they are here to cry. They know full well that information is readily available, and exactly where to go. 
 

Human behavior is a fascinating thing.  

Posted
  On 5/31/2024 at 12:41 AM, WrestlingRasta said:

Someone that comes to an anonymous wrestling non topics message board to ask that question is not seeking that information, they are here to cry. They know full well that information is readily available, and exactly where to go. 
 

Human behavior is a fascinating thing.  

Expand  

No zippy, I’m trying to make people think.  If you can’t say what he was convicted of, what does that tell you?

  • Haha 1
Posted
  On 5/31/2024 at 12:41 AM, Offthemat said:

Accounting errors?  Those can be a misdemeanor, with a two year statute of limitations.  Our resident lawyer doesn’t even understand the novel law that he was convicted of.  Can’t name it and can’t explain it.  
 

It’s astonishing to see the actions of the people who can’t see the Republic coming to an end.  

Expand  

There are many crimes that can be either misdemeanors or felonies depending on prosecutorial charging decisions.  I know exactly what charges he faced, what are you talking about?

You are a voice of reason. - @Paul158

Posted
  On 5/31/2024 at 12:52 AM, VakAttack said:

There are many crimes that can be either misdemeanors or felonies depending on prosecutorial charging decisions.  I know exactly what charges he faced, what are you talking about?

Expand  

Then why can’t you say what he was convicted of?

Posted
  On 5/31/2024 at 12:41 AM, WrestlingRasta said:

Someone that comes to an anonymous wrestling non topics message board to ask that question is not seeking that information, they are here to cry. They know full well that information is readily available, and exactly where to go. 
 

Human behavior is a fascinating thing.  

Expand  

So is your concern with sphincters and Vaseline 

Posted
  On 5/31/2024 at 12:55 AM, Offthemat said:

Then why can’t you say what he was convicted of?

Expand  

....I did.  I told you exactly what he was convicted of.  34 counts of first degree falsification of business records.  He was convicted of falsifying business records to conceal multiple other crimes, namely falsifying other business records, breaking the Federal Election Campaign Act or submitting false information on a tax return.

You are a voice of reason. - @Paul158

Posted
  On 5/31/2024 at 1:03 AM, VakAttack said:

....I did.  I told you exactly what he was convicted of.  34 counts of first degree falsification of business records.  He was convicted of falsifying business records to conceal multiple other crimes, namely falsifying other business records, breaking the Federal Election Campaign Act or submitting false information on a tax return.

Expand  

But can any provide info or link to specific count of how falsified? 

  • Ionel 1

.

Posted
  On 5/31/2024 at 1:03 AM, VakAttack said:

....I did.  I told you exactly what he was convicted of.  34 counts of first degree falsification of business records.  He was convicted of falsifying business records to conceal multiple other crimes, namely falsifying other business records, breaking the Federal Election Campaign Act or submitting false information on a tax return.

Expand  

The IRS and FEC looked at it and found nothing actionable, though they did fine the Clinton campaign over $100k.  So you’re left with the circle Jonathon Turley described - falsifying records to conceal falsifying records.  What records?  What does it matter?  Why can’t you explain what crime he committed?

Posted
  On 5/31/2024 at 1:27 AM, Offthemat said:

The IRS and FEC looked at it and found nothing actionable, though they did fine the Clinton campaign over $100k.  So you’re left with the circle Jonathon Turley described - falsifying records to conceal falsifying records.  What records?  What does it matter?  Why can’t you explain what crime he committed?

Expand  

I think I found it:

Orange man bad

Check falsified

Orange man bad

Voucher falsified

Orange man bad

Check falsified

Orange man bad

Invoice falsified

TDS

Orange man bad

Check falsified

Orange man bad

Voucher falsified

...

  • Bob 3

.

Posted
  On 5/31/2024 at 1:27 AM, Offthemat said:
The IRS and FEC looked at it and found nothing actionable, though they did fine the Clinton campaign over $100k.  So you’re left with the circle Jonathon Turley described - falsifying records to conceal falsifying records.  What records?  What does it matter?  Why can’t you explain what crime he committed?

He wrote off hush money as a campaign expense. That’s not legal.

I’m not sure how you don’t know this by now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
  On 5/31/2024 at 1:34 AM, Le duke said:


He wrote off hush money as a campaign expense. That’s not legal.

I’m not sure how you don’t know this by now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Expand  

No he didn’t.  The FEC looked into it and didn’t find any problem. 

Posted
  On 5/31/2024 at 1:32 AM, ionel said:

I think I found it:

Orange man bad

Check falsified

Orange man bad

Voucher falsified

Orange man bad

Check falsified

Orange man bad

Invoice falsified

TDS

Orange man bad

Check falsified

Orange man bad

Voucher falsified

...

Expand  

That looks like the one I found.  After all this, I did learn that New York is even worse and more backward than I realized. 

Posted
  On 5/31/2024 at 1:27 AM, Offthemat said:

The IRS and FEC looked at it and found nothing actionable, though they did fine the Clinton campaign over $100k.  So you’re left with the circle Jonathon Turley described - falsifying records to conceal falsifying records.  What records?  What does it matter?  Why can’t you explain what crime he committed?

Expand  

Is that what you're hung up on?  That he wasn't charged elsewhere? That's not a requirement of the statute.  Each agency is independent and make their own charging decisions.  This happens every day to defendants throughout the country.

You are a voice of reason. - @Paul158

Posted
  On 5/31/2024 at 1:44 AM, VakAttack said:

Is that what you're hung up on?  That he wasn't charged elsewhere? That's not a requirement of the statute.  Each agency is independent and make their own charging decisions.  This happens every day to defendants throughout the country.

Expand  

That they looked into it and said nothing was wrong.  That they, and the DoG have jurisdiction, and Bragg doesn’t.  And the judge held these facts from the jury.  He allowed false testimony and gave improper instructions.  Like Trump said, Mother Theresa would have been convicted in that court.  

Posted
  On 5/31/2024 at 1:53 AM, Offthemat said:

That they looked into it and said nothing was wrong.  That they, and the DoG have jurisdiction, and Bragg doesn’t.  And the judge held these facts from the jury.  He allowed false testimony and gave improper instructions.  Like Trump said, Mother Theresa would have been convicted in that court.  

Expand  

I'm sorry this hurts your feelings. Feel free to support substantial.criminal justice reform, I'll stand with you. As it is, this exact type of thing happens to your fellow citizens all the time and has been deemed legal. I just had a judge sentence a guy to 6 years in prison for a violation of probation where the violation was a new misdemeanor charge...where the State dropped the new charge that triggered the violation.

You are a voice of reason. - @Paul158

Posted
  On 5/31/2024 at 1:53 AM, Offthemat said:

That they looked into it and said nothing was wrong.  That they, and the DoG have jurisdiction, and Bragg doesn’t.  And the judge held these facts from the jury.  He allowed false testimony and gave improper instructions.  Like Trump said, Mother Theresa would have been convicted in that court.  

Expand  

yeah if she committed those crimes, she likely would have been convicted. 

off topic, but mother theresa sucks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...