Caveira Posted October 25 Posted October 25 5 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said: Blah blah blah. The most basic foundation of our nation puts the power, and the responsibility, in our hands. But it’s easy to whine and blame. Ok. You voted for Kamala in the primaries? 1
Caveira Posted October 25 Posted October 25 3 hours ago, Caveira said: Ok. You voted for Kamala in the primaries? @WrestlingRasta you may have missed this. Question was for you.
WrestlingRasta Posted October 26 Posted October 26 I didn’t miss it, I’ve been….doing things. Just a quick check in here before another wrestling session this morning. And I apologize but I was busy last night. To answer your question: if you’re seriously asking me that question, you haven’t been paying attention. Happy Saturday!
Caveira Posted October 30 Posted October 30 55 minutes ago, jross said: But the scawy wawy Wussians made my siwwy neighbow vote for Twump. It’s baaaaaaad! #nazis #garbage #jazzhands
1032004 Posted October 31 Posted October 31 On 10/22/2024 at 8:36 PM, Offthemat said: Election Exclusive: British Advisors to Kamala Harris Hope to "Kill Musk's Twitter" PAUL D. THACKER AND MATT TAIBBI OCT 22, 2024 The British are coming, to meddle in our elections! In an explosive leak with ramifications for the upcoming U.S. presidential election, internal documents from the Center for Countering Digital Hate—whose founder is British political operative Morgan McSweeney, now advising the Kamala Harriscampaign—show the group plans in writing to “kill Musk’s Twitter” while strengthening ties with the Biden/Harris administration and Democrats like Senator Amy Klobuchar, who has introduced multiple bills to regulate online “misinformation.” Senator Klobuchar’s office did not respond to request for comment. Annual Priorities • Kill Musk's Twitter • Advertising focus • Trigger EU & UK regulatory action • Progress towards change in USA and support for STA https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/election-exclusive-british-advisors You’ve lost the plot if you actually think Harris would ban x if she wins. I’d offer up the refrain I commonly hear: “she’s in office now, why didn’t she do it already!?!?” 1
Caveira Posted October 31 Posted October 31 2 hours ago, 1032004 said: You’ve lost the plot if you actually think Harris would ban x if she wins. I’d offer up the refrain I commonly hear: “she’s in office now, why didn’t she do it already!?!?” What if they go back to pressuring them to censor material they don’t like. Obv it won’t be shut down.
1032004 Posted October 31 Posted October 31 34 minutes ago, Caveira said: What if they go back to pressuring them to censor material they don’t like. Obv it won’t be shut down. Well we know from the twitter files that both the Trump and Biden campaigns asked for tweets to be considered for removal in the past. I also never saw any evidence that tweets the government sent to Twitter and they actually took down did not actually violate their rules. It turned out to mostly be photos of Hunter Biden’s junk. Keep in mind the government did not ask Twitter to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story, Twitter did that on their own. 1
Caveira Posted October 31 Posted October 31 1 minute ago, 1032004 said: Well we know from the twitter files that both the Trump and Biden campaigns asked for tweets to be considered for removal in the past. I also never saw any evidence that tweets the government sent to Twitter and they actually took down did not actually violate their rules. It turned out to mostly be photos of Hunter Biden’s junk. Keep in mind the government did not ask Twitter to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story, Twitter did that on their own. Not even from this guy?
Offthemat Posted October 31 Posted October 31 2 hours ago, 1032004 said: You’ve lost the plot if you actually think Harris would ban x if she wins. I’d offer up the refrain I commonly hear: “she’s in office now, why didn’t she do it already!?!?” If you read, you learn that the current administration is aiding the EU in actions that are, so far, prevented here, only by the Constitution and the current Supreme Court.
1032004 Posted October 31 Posted October 31 4 minutes ago, Caveira said: Not even from this guy? He’s not part of Twitter, fyi 1
Caveira Posted October 31 Posted October 31 1 minute ago, 1032004 said: He’s not part of Twitter, fyi The wsj. https://www.wsj.com/opinion/that-kamala-harris-video-and-censorship-1e89c380
Caveira Posted October 31 Posted October 31 2 minutes ago, 1032004 said: He’s not part of Twitter, fyi How about twitter? CBS Austin Texas Prolly a right wing publication https://cbsaustin.com/news/nation-world/twitter-files-10th-installment-show-white-house-pressure-to-censor-dissenting-voices-biden-administration-coronavirus-misinformation-disinformation-david-zweig-pandemic-online-content-social-media-censoring-censorship-first-amendment-free-speech-vaccines
Caveira Posted October 31 Posted October 31 4 minutes ago, 1032004 said: He’s not part of Twitter, fyi that’s a .gov site. here is a quote “Under former Twitter employees’ watch, Twitter devolved into a private company the FBI and federal government infiltrated to deliberately limit free speech, particularly conservative speech and news contrary to the mainstream narrative. ” https://oversight.house.gov/release/the-cover-up-big-tech-the-swamp-and-mainstream-media-coordinated-to-censor-americans-free-speech-/
Caveira Posted October 31 Posted October 31 6 minutes ago, 1032004 said: He’s not part of Twitter, fyi Or twitter? .gov again https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/115286/documents/HHRG-118-GO00-20230208-SD010.pdf
Caveira Posted October 31 Posted October 31 13 minutes ago, 1032004 said: He’s not part of Twitter, fyi Mr twitter himself https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/05/29/tech/elon-musk-twitter-government-takedown
1032004 Posted October 31 Posted October 31 5 minutes ago, Caveira said: How about twitter? CBS Austin Texas Prolly a right wing publication https://cbsaustin.com/news/nation-world/twitter-files-10th-installment-show-white-house-pressure-to-censor-dissenting-voices-biden-administration-coronavirus-misinformation-disinformation-david-zweig-pandemic-online-content-social-media-censoring-censorship-first-amendment-free-speech-vaccines They did make some mistakes (often by bots) in flagging posts according to the thread, my comment was more specific to tweets being removed. The thread also acknowledged that Twitter regularly pushed back on the requests from the government.
Bigbrog Posted October 31 Posted October 31 I don't care who was/is/or will be in office, the government should not be attempting to censor speech no matter what platform...period. 1
Caveira Posted October 31 Posted October 31 3 minutes ago, 1032004 said: They did make some mistakes (often by bots) in flagging posts according to the thread, my comment was more specific to tweets being removed. The thread also acknowledged that Twitter regularly pushed back on the requests from the government. Threatening law suits on twitter to take down hunter Biden lap top (51 lying intel agents) true stories. …. And or Covid stuff which was also true. Is not “some mistakes”. It’s Tyrannical government oversight.
Caveira Posted October 31 Posted October 31 8 minutes ago, 1032004 said: They did make some mistakes (often by bots) in flagging posts according to the thread, my comment was more specific to tweets being removed. The thread also acknowledged that Twitter regularly pushed back on the requests from the government. Stuff like this should bother you greatly.
Saylors_Tiny_Willie Posted October 31 Posted October 31 13 minutes ago, Bigbrog said: I don't care who was/is/or will be in office, the government should not be attempting to censor speech no matter what platform...period. Not even violent threats? You really are the dumbest poster here.
1032004 Posted October 31 Posted October 31 27 minutes ago, Caveira said: Threatening law suits on twitter to take down hunter Biden lap top (51 lying intel agents) true stories. …. And or Covid stuff which was also true. Is not “some mistakes”. It’s Tyrannical government oversight. Are you implying the letter from the 51 intel agents threatened lawsuits? Here it is, it did not, and also clearly said they weren’t sure if the emails were legitimate, and did not give any suggested direction to social media companies.
Caveira Posted October 31 Posted October 31 18 minutes ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said: Not even violent threats? You really are the dumbest poster here. Like this one ? https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/kathy-griffin-on-death-threats-cancellations-investigations-over-trump-severed-head-photo/
Caveira Posted October 31 Posted October 31 Just now, 1032004 said: Are you implying the letter from the 51 intel agents threatened lawsuits? Here it is, it did not, and also clearly said they weren’t sure if the emails were legitimate, and did not give any suggested direction to social media companies. No i am implying the gov used their lies to censor free speech on social media…. To help them win an election.
1032004 Posted October 31 Posted October 31 15 minutes ago, Caveira said: No i am implying the gov used their lies to censor free speech on social media…. To help them win an election. Who threatened lawsuits to take down the Hunter Biden laptop?
Joel Friederichs Watertown-Mayer, Minnesota Class of 2026 Committed to Minnesota Projected Weight: 133
Titan Friederichs Watertown-Mayer, Minnesota Class of 2026 Committed to Minnesota Projected Weight: 141
Hunter Vander Heiden Freedom, Wisconsin Class of 2025 Committed to California Baptist Projected Weight: 285
Braden Priest Bakersfield, California Class of 2025 Committed to California Baptist Projected Weight: 157
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now