Jump to content

Twitter is better


jross

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, headshuck said:

Referring to the former President as the sitting President isn’t a speech impediment. Ai could swap the words out though.

You don't know what "stammering" is?

Then maybe stop using the word in your posts to describe someone with a speech impediment.

That's super f'd up. Not everyone is born perfect, and nobody needs turds like you to point out our imperfections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't know what "stammering" is?
Then maybe stop using the word in your posts to describe someone with a speech impediment.
That's super f'd up. Not everyone is born perfect, and nobody needs turds like you to point out our imperfections.

Ignored
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Bringing back an oldie, but a goodie thread because this is too funny not to post.

https://www.theinformation.com/articles/musks-x-is-flooded-with-ad-spam-stolen-credit-cards-may-be-key?ref=thediff.co

“Elon Musk’s X, formerly known as Twitter, has in the past couple of months been inundated with a wave of ads for porn sites and fake luxury goods. That might sound like a low-priority problem for X, as these ads – no matter how sketchy – could in theory bring in much-needed ad revenue.

The problem is that the flood of ad spam, as insiders refer to it, has coincided with a surge in credit card firms asking X for refunds on unauthorized transactions. That indicates that at least some of the spam ads are paid for with stolen cards, say people familiar with the situation, which means X doesn’t get to keep any money generated from the ads.”

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
9 hours ago, headshuck said:

 

I love contextless numbers like this. It is a sure sign things are not going well.

My favorite is the engagement with brands. No starting point, just up some unitless %.

Amongst all these numbers, one type seems to be missing. Financial. Hmmm.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

I love contextless numbers like this. It is a sure sign things are not going well.

My favorite is the engagement with brands. No starting point, just up some unitless %.

Amongst all these numbers, one type seems to be missing. Financial. Hmmm.

We know it financially isn't going well by reading into Elon's response in the Don Lemon interview about buying Twitter to protect free speech while avoiding talk of profit.  

From a user perspective, X is going VERY WELL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, jross said:

We know it financially isn't going well by reading into Elon's response in the Don Lemon interview about buying Twitter to protect free speech while avoiding talk of profit.  

From a user perspective, X is going VERY WELL!

Need to mention that X  isn’t receiving the millions in tax dollars from the FBI that twitter did. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Offthemat said:

Need to mention that X  isn’t receiving the millions in tax dollars from the FBI that twitter did. 

It is also not receiving the hundreds of millions in dollars from advertisers that Twitter did.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

It is also not receiving the hundreds of millions in dollars from advertisers that Twitter did.

But those weren’t my dollars.  And they weren’t for censorship. 

Edited by Offthemat
  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I missed this last week, but the Supreme Court refused to hear Musk's Twitter Sitter case, where he claims the agreement he signed with the SEC violates his constitutional rights to free speech. I guess you still can't lie to commit securities fraud.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

It's sssooo much better that they are begging for advertisers...🤣🤣🤣🤣

 

https://futurism.com/elon-musk-begs-advertisers-return-twitter-revenue

 

FTA:

Now, Musk and CEO Linda Yaccarino are back in damage control mode, trying to scrounge up some much-needed funds at this year's Cannes Lions festival in southern France. The mercurial billionaire reportedly met with executives from the likes of the NFL, L'Oreal, Qualcomm, and Target, according to new reporting by the NYT.

But whether these measures will help Musk's hate speech-ridden echo chamber from bleeding hundreds of millions of dollars per quarter remains to be seen.

After all, who could forget that Musk quite literally told advertisers to go ***duck** themselves in November — fighting words that likely didn't sit well with the execs he's now pleading to return to X.

 

  • Poopy 1
  • Clown 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

X is 100% better for us because we decide what information is shared rather than a few editors with agendas.

Imagine how many nit wits would believe all the information hoaxes without Twitter.  

 

  • Bob 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, jross said:

X is 100% better for us because we decide what information is shared rather than a few editors with agendas.

Imagine how many nit wits would believe all the information hoaxes without Twitter.  

 

81 million?

  • Bob 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, three_arrows said:

It's sssooo much better that they are begging for advertisers...🤣🤣🤣🤣

 

https://futurism.com/elon-musk-begs-advertisers-return-twitter-revenue

 

FTA:

Now, Musk and CEO Linda Yaccarino are back in damage control mode, trying to scrounge up some much-needed funds at this year's Cannes Lions festival in southern France. The mercurial billionaire reportedly met with executives from the likes of the NFL, L'Oreal, Qualcomm, and Target, according to new reporting by the NYT.

But whether these measures will help Musk's hate speech-ridden echo chamber from bleeding hundreds of millions of dollars per quarter remains to be seen.

After all, who could forget that Musk quite literally told advertisers to go ***duck** themselves in November — fighting words that likely didn't sit well with the execs he's now pleading to return to X.

 

How did the conversation with Robert Eiger go?

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...