Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Husker_Du said:

if you've heard of climate crisis you've heard antiscience

I’ve had people argue against scientific evidence because it wasn’t the “official science”. I pressed them on what they meant, and they said, “the science that the government says is correct.” Such people should be deemed incompetent to vote.

  • Fire 4
Posted
1 hour ago, Husker_Du said:

if you've heard of climate crisis you've heard antiscience

Did they explain antigravity in antiscience class?

  • Fire 1

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Posted
3 hours ago, Plasmodium said:

Yep. Nobel physics prize winners in 2021 are antiscientists.

can you read?

i mean seriously. the nobel prize winner in the tweet in this thread says opposite. 

and there are a million other studies that concur. most get suppressed bc the entire ClIMaTe crISis thing has msm and the universities behind their agenda.

CNN the other day tweeted that it was the warmest year in 12000 years and the same day a academic outlet posted contrary data.

the whole thing is a scam, and it's worse (via media) in europe. it's an unfathomable percentage of their content.

but hey, lap it up if you want.

call it what you want. maybe i'm using 'antiscience' incorrectly, but the point remains. it's not the real facts. nor were most narratives on covid and the vax. 

  • Fire 3

TBD

Posted
1 minute ago, Husker_Du said:

CNN the other day tweeted that it was the warmest year in 12000 years and the same day a academic outlet posted contrary data.

Clearly false. The Earth is only 6,000 years old, but there will be plenty of hot days during their time in Hell. Heathens.

  • Fire 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Husker_Du said:

can you read?

i mean seriously. the nobel prize winner in the tweet in this thread says opposite. 

and there are a million other studies that concur. most get suppressed bc the entire ClIMaTe crISis thing has msm and the universities behind their agenda.

CNN the other day tweeted that it was the warmest year in 12000 years and the same day a academic outlet posted contrary data.

the whole thing is a scam, and it's worse (via media) in europe. it's an unfathomable percentage of their content.

but hey, lap it up if you want.

call it what you want. maybe i'm using 'antiscience' incorrectly, but the point remains. it's not the real facts. nor were most narratives on covid and the vax. 

I read fine.  The Nobel prize winners I posted say the opposite of what he and others in his organization say.  Most of those studies are suppressed by peer review due to their inaccuracy and obvious self serving purposes. 

I think CNN probably said 120,000 years as I saw that number elsewhere.  Not interested in dying on that hill though.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Husker_Du said:

 

Who was collecting temperature data 120,000 years ago, dianasaurs?  Was that the era of the technically advanced dianasaurs?  And what was it like 125,000 years ago?  Let's get all the facts.  

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Posted
4 minutes ago, ionel said:

Who was collecting temperature data 120,000 years ago, dianasaurs?  Was that the era of the technically advanced dianasaurs?  And what was it like 125,000 years ago?  Let's get all the facts.  

DinOsaurs LOL

Posted
4 hours ago, Plasmodium said:

Yep. Nobel physics prize winners in 2021 are antiscientists.

you suppose anyone is pushing an agenda with the award? 

money exchanging hands? 

im naive, but come on

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Plasmodium said:

DinOsaurs LOL

autocrap & fat fingrs.  😞

Edited by ionel
  • Haha 1

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Posted

The US budgeted $45B this year to “fight global climate change”. Meanwhile, nine million people starve to death globally each year. That’s $5k per person who dies from starvation that our federal government spends on doing something that may or may not help something that may or may not be happening.
 

That’s not saying we shouldn’t care about the planet. There are just more immediate concerns that need to be addressed and more efficient ways of spending our money. Solving world hunger would be a good place to start, and the bonus is, lifting people out of poverty is the only proven way to help the environment. Bjorn Lomborg has a lot of good stuff on this. 

  • Fire 1
Posted

this belongs in the problem with our GOVT thread,

but since you brought up $45 Bil for garbage.. i thought i would post it here.

lets see how smart you guys are.

dont google

say u have a 4 inch line. million on one end. Trillion on the other. where does billion go?

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

 

say u have a 4 inch line. million on one end. Trillion on the other. where does billion go?

 

<insert penis joke>

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...