Jump to content

Murin-Yianni - no backpoints?


VakAttack

Recommended Posts

So as some of you might have heard, I couldn't' watch most of the NCAA tournament, so I didn't see this match until just now.  Can anybody help me understand why the situation at the end was not backpoints for Murin?  I just watched it, and the ref appears to be more concerned about looking for a non-controlled fall than the fact that Yianni's back looked to be exposed, especially at the beginning of the exchange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, VakAttack said:

So as some of you might have heard, I couldn't' watch most of the NCAA tournament, so I didn't see this match until just now.  Can anybody help me understand why the situation at the end was not backpoints for Murin?  I just watched it, and the ref appears to be more concerned about looking for a non-controlled fall than the fact that Yianni's back looked to be exposed, especially at the beginning of the exchange.

I could not watch it either - but no surprise that there are some tight calls.  Yianni is a guy whose style flirts with danger, but I guess not as much as Spencer Lee. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, VakAttack said:

At the end, I agree, but for the first 5ish seconds?  I thought he was.

Have a link to the video you watched and a time stamp where you think the count should've started?  It's fun reviewing this stuff.  I don't remember thinking swipes should've started when watching live. Also, I don't think the Brands threw in the brick either. 

I Don't Agree With What I Posted

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, PortaJohn said:

Have a link to the video you watched and a time stamp where you think the count should've started?  It's fun reviewing this stuff.  I don't remember thinking swipes should've started when watching live. Also, I don't think the Brands threw in the brick either. 

Solid point on the brick.  I'll have to reopen it later and I'll try to get a screen shot.

  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/20/2023 at 1:54 PM, VakAttack said:

At the end, I agree, but for the first 5ish seconds?  I thought he was.

I thought first part of the exchange could have been a classic quick 2.    After yanni adjusted not so much.  
 

with that said.   I’m paraphrasing and may be slightly wrong.  Someone posted a rule in that really long thread stipulating if one of the shoulder blades is not physically touching the mat.   Then the defensive wrestler cannot be more than (?) approx 4 inches above the ground or something.   I’m not positive on the “4” inches part.  
 

as an Iowa fan.   Quick two or nothing.   I was voting for a quick 2 during the Match lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Caveira said:

I thought first part of the exchange could have been a classic quick 2.    After yanni adjusted not so much.  
 

with that said.   I’m paraphrasing and may be slightly wrong.  Someone posted a rule in that really long thread stipulating if one of the shoulder blades is not physically touching the mat.   Then the defensive wrestler cannot be more than (?) approx 4 inches above the ground or something.   I’m not positive on the “4” inches part.  
 

as an Iowa fan.   Quick two or nothing.   I was voting for a quick 2 during the Match lol. 

Below is the criteria for near fall.  Highlighted the 4 inch criteria for you.  Nothing in that exchange that I could see met the criteria

 Section 5. Near Fall

Art. 1. Near Fall Criteria. A near fall is a position in which the offensive

wrestler has the opponent in a controlled pinning situation in which any one of

the following three criteria are met:

a. The defensive wrestler is held in a high bridge or on both elbows;

b. Any part of one shoulder or scapula, or the head is touching the mat and

the other shoulder or scapula is held at an angle of 45 degrees or less to

the mat; or

c. Any part of both shoulders or both scapulae are held within four inches

of the mat.

In any pinning situation,

I Don't Agree With What I Posted

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PortaJohn said:

Below is the criteria for near fall.  Highlighted the 4 inch criteria for you.  Nothing in that exchange that I could see met the criteria

 Section 5. Near Fall

Art. 1. Near Fall Criteria. A near fall is a position in which the offensive

wrestler has the opponent in a controlled pinning situation in which any one of

the following three criteria are met:

a. The defensive wrestler is held in a high bridge or on both elbows;

b. Any part of one shoulder or scapula, or the head is touching the mat and

the other shoulder or scapula is held at an angle of 45 degrees or less to

the mat; or

c. Any part of both shoulders or both scapulae are held within four inches

of the mat.

In any pinning situation,

So I paraphrased somewhat close 🙂 thx 

  • Fire 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...