Mamdami's promises

[braves121]

16 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

It’s a good thing the republicans were created to fix it huh! 

lol the same republicans that throw up memorials and statues and name things after the people who wanted and fought to keep slavery?

[JimmySpeaks]

Our great nation got rid of slavery and the rest of the world followed.  Well most of it did. There are still places that allow it. You know India, China, North Korea, Pakistan, Indonesia, Nigeria.   Hmmmmmmmmmm

[JimmySpeaks]

Just now, braves121 said:

lol the same republicans that throw up memorials and statues and name things after the people who wanted and fought to keep slavery?

Fact: the Republican Party rid the country of slavery.  Dems, the party of the kkk fought to keep it.  Those pesky facts huh? 

[JimmySpeaks]

8 minutes ago, braves121 said:

lol the same republicans that throw up memorials and statues and name things after the people who wanted and fought to keep slavery?

It’s funny how the world was all in on slavery when America became a country. Took us less than 90 years to change the world from its wicked ways.   

Edited August 30 by JimmySpeaks

[Scouts Honor]

2 hours ago, braves121 said:

lol the same republicans that throw up memorials and statues and name things after the people who wanted and fought to keep slavery?

um, those were democrats.

 

[Scouts Honor]

2 hours ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Fact: the Republican Party rid the country of slavery.  Dems, the party of the kkk fought to keep it.  Those pesky facts huh? 

and they are fighting to keep it still today

[Scouts Honor]

 

[1032004]

6 hours ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Fact: the Republican Party rid the country of slavery.  Dems, the party of the kkk fought to keep it.  Those pesky facts huh? 

The “Radical” Republicans to be exact.   @Caveira thinks radical is a synonym for terrorist.

[Scouts Honor]

as i said before there is no radical islam

only islam

muslims have said this repeatedly

[Scouts Honor]

leftists doing leftist things with no knowledge of history or people

 

[Scouts Honor]

not to mention the removal of a confederate doctor's statue, who treated both sides wounded in the civil war

[Caveira]

11 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

as i said before there is no radical islam

only islam

muslims have said this repeatedly

many Muslim scholars, leaders, and public figures reject prefixes like "radical Islam" or "moderate Islam," asserting that there is only one Islam. However, they say this from two completely opposite perspectives. [1, 2]

The phrase you quoted is commonly used by mainstream Muslims to defend their faith from being defined by a violent minority, but it is also used by fundamentalists to reject Western concepts of modernization. [1]

 

1. Mainstream & Orthodox View: Protecting Islam from Labels

The most common reason Muslim scholars and leaders reject the term "radical Islam" is to clarify that terrorism has no place in the religion, and that adding political adjectives creates a false version of Islam. From this perspective, the actions of extremists are entirely outside the faith, meaning there is only one true, peaceful Islam. [1, 2]

• Imran Khan (Former Prime Minister of Pakistan): During an address at the Council on Foreign Relations, he stated: "There is only One Islam, No moderate or radical Islam, and that One Islam is what Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) preached which is all about Justice and Peace." [1]
• Recep Tayyip Erdoğan (President of Turkey): Erdogan has repeatedly criticized Western use of these terms, famously stating: "These modifiers are very ugly, it is offensive and an insult to our religion. There is no moderate or radical Islam. Islam is Islam."
• Dr. Mohamed Ghilan (Islamic Jurisprudence Scholar): Writing on the distinction for Al Jazeera, he argued that terms like "Islamic extremism" are misnomers, stating that the problem lies with extremist individuals, not the religion itself. [1]

 

2. Islamist & Fundamentalist View: Rejecting Western "Moderate" Standards

On the other side of the spectrum, hardline or Islamist figures use the exact same phrase to reject the idea that Islam should be updated or softened to fit Western liberal ideals. To them, there is only one rigid, unchanging interpretation of Sharia law.

• Historical Islamist Ideologues (e.g., Sayyid Qutb While the specific modern terminology of "radical vs. moderate" came later, foundational thinkers of political Islam argued that there are no degrees of Islam—one either submits to the divine system fully or belongs to the world of ignorance (Jahiliyyah).
• Ramzan Kadyrov (Head of the Chechen Republic): Kadyrov has echoed similar sentiments, stating that there is no "moderate" or "radical" Islam, only the traditional, conservative Islam passed down by the Prophet, using it to dismiss foreign ideological frameworks.

[JimmySpeaks]

57 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

The “Radical” Republicans to be exact.   @Caveira thinks radical is a synonym for terrorist.

It was a brand new party. Far from radical. 

[1032004]

1 minute ago, JimmySpeaks said:

It was a brand new party. Far from radical. 

I always get a laugh out of people saying “it was Republicans who were against slavery!” and implying those Republicans had anything in common with current Republicans 

lol

Edited August 30 by 1032004

[JimmySpeaks]

Just now, 1032004 said:

I always get a laugh out of people saying “it was Republicans who were against slavery!”

lol

I’m glad facts make you laugh.  Don’t worry be happy. 

[1032004]

9 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

I’m glad facts make you laugh.  Don’t worry be happy. 

Too bad those Republicans don’t have anything in common with the current ones 

[El Luchador]

17 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

I always get a laugh out of people saying “it was Republicans who were against slavery!” and implying those Republicans had anything in common with current Republicans 

lol

[JimmySpeaks]

16 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Too bad those Republicans don’t have anything in common with the current ones 

Those republicans are the same as today’s.  All about keeping the republic a republic.  Not like the commie dems that want to abolish the senate, electoral college and president. 

[1032004]

15 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Those republicans are the same as today’s.  

You should be a comedian 

[JimmySpeaks]

6 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

You should be a comedian 

It’s not the republicans trying to dismantle the republic. It’s you libtards. 

[1032004]

Just now, JimmySpeaks said:

It’s not the republicans trying to dismantle the republic. It’s you libtards. 

“Republicans” aren’t.  MAGA is.

[JimmySpeaks]

5 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

“Republicans” aren’t.  MAGA is.

MAGA isn’t trying to dump the electoral college, the senate or get rid of the position of POTUS.  
AGAIN ITS YOU LIBTARDS. 

[1032004]

1 minute ago, JimmySpeaks said:

MAGA isn’t trying to dump the electoral college, the senate or get rid of the position of POTUS.  
AGAIN ITS YOU LIBTARDS. 

I missed those proposals.  Link?

[JimmySpeaks]

1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

I missed those proposals.  Link?

It’s people from the party under the big tent that YOU support.  

[1032004]

1 minute ago, JimmySpeaks said:

It’s people from the party under the big tent that YOU support.  

I don’t support any “party.”  I view every race independently