Now Nazi tattoos are cool

[braves121]

25 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

not sure?

does it matter?

two wrongs make a right?

i mean thats where we are going right now...

well blacks have been oppressed, so they should be able to stab

muslims have been oppressed by their own countries so they should be able to rape and maim and kidnap

 

how long until whites can be justified for being radicalized against their own marginilization? 

Damn seems like you want some race wars wtf 

[Scouts Honor]

i dont.

leftists do.  have you not looked around? 

[Caveira]

11 minutes ago, braves121 said:

Damn seems like you want some race wars wtf 

Your buddy the Viking keeps talking about political “vengeance”.    

Edited August 23 by Caveira

[1032004]

4 hours ago, Bigbrog said:

WTF are you talking about??  I have never ever even come close to saying that or even infering it.

You quoted this line from me:

On 8/20/2026 at 4:39 PM, 1032004 said:

various forms of systemic racism against blacks that still exist…

And wrote this:

On 8/21/2026 at 9:43 AM, Bigbrog said:

Please provide proof that this is true 

Which clearly is doubting that systemic racism against blacks is still an issue.   So either you think there’s currently also not a problem with racism against white males, or you’re implying racism against white males is currently worse than against blacks.  Which is it?

Edited August 23 by 1032004

[jross]

21 hours ago, 1032004 said:

Interesting that you only chose to share a link to M-W’s definition of “systemic racism,” but not simply racism.

Here is racism: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/racism

And one of the definitions:

b: behavior or attitudes that reflect and foster this belief : discrimination, prejudice, or violence against people because of their race

 

And here are TWO of the definitions of bias via your link:

a: an inclination of temperament or outlook

especially  : a personal and sometimes unreasoned judgment : PREJUDICE

 

b: an instance of such prejudice

No redefining words here.  Seeing a black person and then guessing there is a higher probability a crime might occur is racism.  It may not be intentional, or even conscious, but it’s still racism.  And many people feel that way, making it systemic.

"Seeing a black person and then guessing there is a higher probability a crime might occur is racism."
FALSE.  This person's skin color puts him in a group that commits a higher rate of crime.  But this does not make him inferior.  His presentation is one of respect.  These statements are not prejudice and not racism.  

USAA charges more for my children then for me as a base due to their age. This is because the data shows their age is higher risk for accidents. This is not ageism or prejudice.

It really is comparable.

[jross]

This man's skin color puts him in a group that commits lower crime rates.  But the number of tattoos on his face puts him in a group that commits higher crime rates.  This is not prejudice.  This is not racism.  

[Scouts Honor]

it's called common sense

[1032004]

20 minutes ago, jross said:

This man's skin color puts him in a group that commits lower crime rates.  But the number of tattoos on his face puts him in a group that commits higher crime rates.  This is not prejudice.  This is not racism.  

The statement you wrote above isn’t prejudice.   It is not prejudiced to point out statistics, it is prejudiced to use those statistics to then make a “starting assumption” (your words) about someone you know nothing about.  It’s an explicit admission that white privilege exists.

[Scouts Honor]

lol that person is white, they probably won't kill me

 

again, it's called common sense

[jross]

16 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

it is prejudiced to use those statistics to then make a “starting assumption” (your words) about someone you know nothing about.  

False

[1032004]

9 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

lol that person is white, they probably won't kill me

 

 

AKA white privilege

Edited August 23 by 1032004

[jross]

11 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

lol that person is white, they probably won't kill me

again, it's called common sense

That white person has face tattoos, I better keep my distance.

 

3 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

AKA white privilege

False

[Scouts Honor]

9 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

AKA white privilege

yes, you have the privilege not to die, b/c the person is white

[Scouts Honor]

10 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

AKA white privilege

so are you saying blacks have black privilege, b/c a fellow black probably won't kill them? but again, you can't be sure

 

or do they have white privilege, b/c a white person won't kill them? 

[1032004]

17 minutes ago, jross said:

False

Looks like we disagree, let’s leave it at that.

[jross]

When the bushes rustled, 1032004 waited to see if it was a squirrel or tiger.  He is buried out back.

[1032004]

30 minutes ago, jross said:

When the bushes rustled, 1032004 waited to see if it was a squirrel or tiger.  He is buried out back.

I’m not saying people are wrong to have certain prejudices.  But they’re still prejudices, which leads to certain groups having an advantage (or more specifically, certain groups having a disadvantage which by default gives other ones an advantage).

[Caveira]

2 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

I’m not saying people are wrong to have certain prejudices.  But they’re still prejudices, which leads to certain groups having an advantage (or more specifically, certain groups having a disadvantage which by default gives other ones an advantage).

Try to just commit a lot less crime.  Maybe clean up the neighborhood instead 

[Scouts Honor]

20 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

I’m not saying people are wrong to have certain prejudices.  But they’re still prejudices, which leads to certain groups having an advantage (or more specifically, certain groups having a disadvantage which by default gives other ones an advantage).

yes, certain groups attack, which is an advantage.

surprise should no longer be the advantage

[Scouts Honor]

16 hours ago, braves121 said:

Damn seems like you want some race wars wtf 

 

[Scouts Honor]

but they are just so oppressed they have to kill

when pray tell is it time to fight back? will we be allowed? 

[jross]

6 hours ago, 1032004 said:

I’m not saying people are wrong to have certain prejudices.  But they’re still prejudices, which leads to certain groups having an advantage (or more specifically, certain groups having a disadvantage which by default gives other ones an advantage).

There is no prejudice in the story of the squirrel and tiger.  

Men are pulled over more than women, and arrested more.  That is not female privilege.

Prejudice is judging without reason or evidence. Using group data can be well reasoned. Treating patterns as absolutes, or refusing to update once you know the individual, is prejudice.

Where you and others are mistaken is treating all pre judgement as prejudice.  

[Scouts Honor]

so much for racism

 

[1032004]

On 8/23/2026 at 6:28 PM, jross said:

 

Where you and others are mistaken is treating all pre judgement as prejudice.  

It’s kinda the definition…

(2): preconceived judgment or opinion

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/prejudice
 

 

[jross]

2 hours ago, 1032004 said:

It’s kinda the definition…

(2): preconceived judgment or opinion

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/prejudice

False.  That is only one of multiple senses of the word.  The definition includes “an adverse opinion or leaning formed without just grounds or before sufficient knowledge”

The data provides just ground for an adverse opinion or leaning.