All Activity

If they got some preliminary info indicating that it was a Muslim then there's nothing wrong. If it was based upon absolutely nothing, then it would matter. Context matters, which is something the wingers dont' understand.

Could be except he has a win with GB and had an understanding waiting for details to be ironed out with China. An agreement with S Korea and Japan. It's not just one. mspart

I've seen none of this in the news sources that I pay attention to. The wingers are the only people I see bringing this up. I don't go to fringe news sources like most of the wingers here.

There is another thread. Called something like white people are the biggest threat to the us…. Where several people whine that some rando said the shooter in another thing is possibly Muslim.

Again, we have an example of the excuses right here in this thread. mspart

First of all, you're making assumptions that they "want" it to be white guy. Secondly, none of it matters when they continue to provide updates on their latest information and an hour later make it very clear that it was NOT a white guy. Absolutely zero harm done here. Wingers, as usual, getting their panties in a bundle over absolutlely nothing and making ridiculous assumptions.

Except this is what the left is saying. Not being made up. https://www.euronews.com/culture/2025/07/29/explained-why-is-sydney-sweeneys-american-eagle-fashion-ad-being-called-tone-deaf-and-nazi By David Mouriquand Published on 29/07/2025 - 16:36 GMT+2 American fashion retailer American Eagle and Hollywood actress Sydney Sweeney have been the subject of fierce criticism for a jeans advert which was aimed at raising awareness about domestic abuse. Instead, the campaign has sparked backlash over racial undertones. Here’s everything you need to know. A new ad campaign featuring Euphoria and White Lotus star Sydney Sweeney has sparked fierce backlash over racial undertones, leading some to label it as “tone-deaf” and even “Nazi”. So it is right there. The right is not making this up. It is what the wokesters are saying. mspart

They were setting it up for everyone to expect it was a white guy that shot people to death. Like I said earlier, there is a thread on this board about how white conservatives are the most dangerous people. This plays into that. Somebody shot up people, must be a white guy. Or is probably a white guy. It portrays the political leanings of an individual that would do this. CNN wants so badly to be politically in the middle yet just can't ween themselves off of this leftist ideology. It is apparent and there for all to see. That is what the fuss is about. Another example of rapant leftist media doing what they do and leftists are saying - "What? I don't see a problem. Everyone knows most shooting crime is done by whites. So he probably was white. " We have an example of that right here in this thread. mspart

that would have been extremely useful 12 hours ago lol

Yes; right-wing radio is probably all over this. The ironic thing is that 95% of the wingers pay attention to this while most liberals haven't heard or care about it. It's sort of like the narrative that the liberals want to take away everybody's guns. About 1% of liberals actually want that while 99% of the wingers think it's extremely close to happening. The wingers truly live in an alternative reality.

Why does the ad hark back to Nazi times? I think that is where the issue is. I heard it on the weird radio!! mspart

Somebody obviously cares about it but I can go to right-wing websites and find much, much more ridiculous stuff than that.

You’re one of 200,000,000 that would love to live the American dream. Nice.

The libtardos on here are definitely representative of the average wokester trying to bring communism to America.

It’s obviously not petty to the wokesters

No; I don't care about that. It didn't pop up on my feed and never would because I don't typically pay attention to petty crap like that. Advertisers can generally do whatever they want as far as I'm concerned and the vast majority of liberals don't care about this either.

Just a little

It popped up on my feed soooooooooooo. Care to elaborate on why wokesters have to play the race card on a blue jeans ad?

Another hat to throw in the ring at 141lbs (if Swiderski and Jamison are 149/157 and not going back down to 141) is Carter Young. He beat Bartlett, albeit in MFS and on the backside at WTT via 10-0 tech. Before anyone clasps on to that being the backside, the match on the frontside at the Open was 5-3 for Bartlett - so not a blow out. I think you go who your best two options are in Jamison, Swiderski, and Teague at 149/157 and I wouldn't care if we see all three at some amalgamation of both weights before the new year, so long as they settled it by then so whoever goes 157lbs can settle in to it by conferences.

The stuff you'll read on here is truly unbelievable. I just look at it as entertainment and try to hope that the idiocy isn't truly representative of the average American, or even people in the wrestling community.

But they're on the same team. I don't think he is beating him, let alone taking the spot from him. I would be okay being proven wrong, though. How sick would that be?

I think there are three non champs with 5 PFs. Dan Gable 2nd place 1970 in 22:08, Darryl Peterson 5th place 1985 in 5:31, and Gary Albright 3rd place 1986 15:34. Both Gable and Peterson benefited from a championship pig tail. You had Albright and Gable with 5 falls in the table in your thread on this award, but Peterson only had 4 falls in the table. Interesting stuff in that thread.

I checked that one. The shift from 3 pt to either 2 or 4 didn't happen until 2016.

You dig deep for any supposed example of "wokeness" that you can find. Do you scrounge the internet for this stuff? WOW!!! Meanwhile, 99% of us (including liberals) probably never even read or paid attention to that article or claim from MSNBC; whatever or whenever it was.

She does look possibly white so ...