All Activity

Please show where Turley showed conservative idealism in his report that I cited. Then I'll take your critique more seriously. I find his legal explanations are none partisan. They are straightforward and professorial in my opinion. I'll give you some examples: “[Undocumented persons are being] deported without due process. Kavanaugh has said go for it, not constitutional problem.” I am not sure what Professor Klarman was referencing here. However, in cases like A.A.R.P. v. Trump, Justice Kavanaugh joined his colleagues in halting deportations to protect the due process rights of these undocumented persons. It was Justices Alito and Thomas who dissented to allow removal under the Alien Enemies Act. The majority stated that the Administration “erred in dismissing the detainees’ appeal for lack of jurisdiction.” Kavanaugh wrote a concurrence stating: “The circumstances call for a prompt and final resolution, which likely can be provided only by this Court. At this juncture, I would prefer not to remand to the lower courts and further put off this Court’s final resolution of the critical legal issues. Rather, consistent with the Executive Branch’s request for expedition—and as the detainees themselves urge—I would grant certiorari, order prompt briefing, hold oral argument soon thereafter, and then resolve the legal issues.” In 2025, he did vote with the majority in a 5-4 decision on Venezuelan immigrants. It allowed for deportations to continue in ruling that the challengers erred in not bringing their challenges as habeas corpus claims. However, it also ruled that the alleged gang members need to be given notice of deportation and the opportunity to contest the deportation. Kavanaugh voted in favor of that position. I may be missing what Professor Klarman is referencing but Kavanaugh has repeatedly voted in favor of due process rights, even if it may not be as robust as Professor Klarman might have wanted. There are cases under this and prior administrations allowing for immediate deportations near the border that occur within a certain period of time. I cannot see any decision where he has effectively “said go for it” and deny any due process. 2. “Washington Post fired a journalist who simply reposted words from Charlie Kirk’s mouth” and “[Bezos] just fired a journalist for basically saying something that is true.” Professor Klarman made repeated claims about this controversy. It appears to be a reference to the termination of former Washington Post columnist Karen Attiah. However, it is not true that she was fired for “simply reposting words from Charlie Kirk’s mouth” but for making racially inflammatory comments in direct contravention of both Washington Post policies and prior warnings from her editors. Soon after Charlie Kirk’s assassination, Attiah went on to Bluesky to post an attack on him with reference to his race. In one, she declared: “Refusing to tear my clothes and smear ashes on my face in performative mourning for a white man that espoused violence is….not the same as violence.” In a second posting, she wrote, “Part of what keeps America so violent is the insistence that people perform care, empty goodness and absolution for white men who espouse hatred and violence.” Those were the comments cited by the Washington Post for its actions. The Post stated “Your postings on Bluesky (which clearly identifies you as a Post Columnist) about white men in response to the killing of Charlie Kirk do not comply with our policy.” The Post prohibits postings that disparage people based on their race, gender, or other protected characteristics. Sources told the media that Attiah had been confronted multiple times by the paper’s management over her inflammatory social media posts. This includes one in 2020 where she ended up apologizing on social media for erroneously saying that a new French law targeted Muslim children. It is simply not true that the Post fired her for quoting Kirk. Please let us know how this is rooted in politics. In my opinion he is quite factual in his explanations. You may not think so and that would be interesting to hear. There are more examples in his report that you can look at. mspart

Other than the people taking it while pregnant on video?

I am going to call bullshit. No is intentionally ingesting more Tylenol to prove the orange one wrong. Now yes it is bad for your liver and should watch your dosage.

Main ones for me are Blaze,Wesbster,Figs,Aj,Sinclair if he counts since he was 197 last year.

Not sure if worth being tossed around by Suriano or DeSanto though

I suggested the idea to Michigan Grappler a few years ago and they seemed interested. But I think Roger Chandler owns the site, so that might be why they've never launched one.

AKA- "It's ok when I stereotype but not when you do!"

Or white men are bad. Or fascists. Or Christian’s. or Authoritarian Racist White supremacist Sexist Misogynist Homophobic Transphobic Climate denier Ignorant Uneducated Deplorable Gun nut Religious extremist Anti-progress Stuck in the past Corporate shill Greedy Anti-democracy Insurrectionist

Just watched. Very onesided Henschel's way.

Something something something "the guy hand picked by trump to be the main legal defense of Brett Kavanuagh during his hearing just happens to be the guy that aligns with my political leanings... oh and he used to be democrat! (So was Trump- not the I gotcha you think it is) Site and give whatever opinion you want- the guy is a right wing hack. Thats not to say Klarman isn't a left wing hack- I don't know him or his positions well enough but that's not the point I'm making. Turley has been a mouthpiece on Fox News for this admin for the past 10 years. It's great you think he's great, no one cares.

Soooo. The track record of democrats having the balls multiple times to indict ….. try… and convict Mr Trump in the past shows you that now they don’t have the balls to indict … try… or convict him again?

I heard this on the radio as well. If Trump says breathing is good, will there be people saying he is wrong and they'll prove it? Of course not. Why is Tylenol any different? Read the stinking warnings. mspart

It means that Snyder won three in a row while weighing 225lbs, even taking out a two time defending champ his first year at HWT. Cassar, being 229lbs at NCAAs took out Gable. We haven't had a behemoth win HWT since Konrad.

Ah cool, love it. I agree, although I think Deakin might be a bit bigger right now? AOC is fighting at 155lbs, isn't he? Ah, okay. Not sure how it would go. I heard Amine was injured, hence the reason he was out, then I heard rumor that his recovery might not be going as well and retirement was being considered? There are those on here that swear that Nicky Skeletor is warp-digivolving past Nicky Pushups and into Nicky Bulkjob to go 65 KG for 2028. Gross even when he isn't competing seems to always be wrestling, so that would be a helluva match, I agree. I think anything 155lbs+ is just going to be Zain all-day. He might not be competing at the same level, but he is active in the CLAW league. Until we see Johnny D against someone who isn't way out of shape or someone who we'd send as a medal contender, I have a hard time seeing him winning. I would still watch 10/10 times, though, as Johnny D seems to wrestle him so damn well. Alirez, I think, was hampered by injury as well, right? If he is back to form (or improved), this match would be fire. I think Glory has been working Wall Street since his title, hasn't he? Would be cool to see him give it a go, though. This would likely be a bloodbath in MFS. I think Nolf, if he competes at RAF again, will have a FAR different approach to it. I don't think he took any of it seriously (in a competing mindframe). He was just there for the fun. Give him a camp, and he destroys Wick - all due respects. Monday as well. What is Sloan doing? I do believe Warner is proper retired isn't he?

TDS is real and leads to self destruction.

you mean like redneck or maybe deplorable or maybe maggat or flyover country

I just heard this on the radio. https://www.instagram.com/p/DPB7Vd3jmP9/ Some lady OD'd on Tylenol while pregnant and is now on a ventilator. I can't see the instagram but I believe it is the lady that got a call from the husband. Apparently, this lady took so much, she is in serious crisis and this lady on the instagram says she will die. Why would people do this? I suppose this is all not true but the video above says that there are people doing this. Tylenol is bad for the liver and there are many warnings not to overuse it because of liver issues. This is just plain stupid. If Trump was to say heroin is bad for women to use while pregnant, will pregnant women go out and OD on heroin to prove him wrong? Tylenol is known for bad outcomes if overused. I just don't understand. mspart

Not even @nhs67 wants that...

Is there a Michigan Wrestling forum anywhere?

True story - I wore a kilt to prom and everyone knows a true Scot doesn't wear anything under his kilt . . .

Professional wrestling needs jobbers, and if there was ever a person deserving to be on a RAF card, it's Cayden Henschel.

As does Varner / Downey. What about Lance Palmer / Bear?

Huge pickup for them