Were these statements actually false? Does the prosecution claim that there was no voter fraud? That no mail-in ballots were illegally cast? That no illegal votes were cast on behalf of felons or dead people? Presumably not. The falsity apparently resides in whether any such fraud was “massive,” or enough to reverse the outcome of the election in Georgia. But in the immediate aftermath of the election, no one knew how extensive the fraud was. That was a matter for proof in a post-election contest.
The Georgia prosecution is intensely political, even compared with the other criminal cases in which Donald Trump is embroiled. It seems intended to chill apparently losing Republican candidates from pursuing legal remedies, as, for example, Al Gore did in 2000. And it has elements of a Soviet show trial, with Ellis tearfully confessing her alleged sins for the benefit of the press.
It is a dirty business, and it isn’t over yet.
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2023/10/jenna-ellis-pleads-guilty.php
For the sake of having all the information, you may want to read the actual charges she plead guilty to rather than a writer's 'summation'. The actual charging documents are just a smidge more specific, will help clarify.