2. How can anyone justify a win by criteria with a 1-1 score, both scores coming via the shot clock. Look at J'den Cox's lone win and tell me he deserved the victory. Happens too often especially in Greco. And the sad thing is that most often the first guy put on the clock is the main Staller, but obligatory shot call to the other guy comes in the 2nd pd, and he loses even when he's more active.
Side note- ugliest win in the tournament McKenna vs Bartlett (must watch)
We used to have 1-1 matches at the end of nine minutes, and then the three officials get together, burn a spliff, and decide who wins.
As soon as there is a point on the board, you know (or should know) you are winning or losing. You know (or should know) whether you need to hold or whether you need to score. There's no its not fair here.
(PS- passivity is not judged based on activity, it is based on holding center)