Husker_Du

i'm not gonna keep going round and round with you. if you want to think Fox News is the cause behind the left and right fighting, go ahead. i think it's abundantly clear the fighting is the product of utterly idiotic policy of this administration and anti-science narratives by just about every MSM source that time and time again gets proven wrong and/or counter productive.

she admitted she's not a biologist lol

wtf does that have to do with anything? the fate of the country? lol. the fate of the country is in peril b/c harvard, a private institution, has a 4% asian enrollment. i'm with you on your politics (i think) - but that one is out there.

Same reason Nikola Jokic plays in the NBA. they are private institutions. a more fitting question would be why we are hellbent on allowing a mass influx of illegal immigrants which certainly affects tax payers.

right, right. i know you are but what am i? keep your mask up and get your booster

just semantics. sounds totally fine.

i don't think we want our standard for human rights violations to be the lowest common denominator w/ Russia

i see that. can i ask you though - are 'cluster munitions' considered 'dirty tactics' as 'cluster bombs' are? if so, it's not cool imo. and you can bet your ass this will be thrown back in our faces.

imo, Trump's policies were never in question. they were/are superior. he just can't help himself from being a prick. and voters are relatively stupid and shallow. i have no idea what's going to happen, but the current policies under this admin are so stupid it's almost like they want to hurt the country on purpose. i think it would be interesting if we all listed what policies we'd like to see enacted going forward. here's mine: 1) fully secured southern border w/ proper documentation/process for immigrants and deportation for offenders (which would also crush the fentanyl stream which is out of control 2) open domestic oil production back up (which would reduce inflation immediately) 3) get the eff out of the Ukraine conflict. it's a giant grift from one of the world's most corrupt governments and we're the suckers

i believe you and thank you fo explaining the difference that being said, i'm literally watching CNN right now and Biden is talking about them (he says munitions) but the chyron reads 'cluster bombs'

that is the point that is often repeated: "their legal team must have thought they were liable, because the settled." and it's a good, fair point. however i think there's more to it. and i say that b/c 1) i watch fox a lot and i don't recall any of their hosts banging the 'dominion is crooked' drum'. (for sure their guests did, though). 2) where are the clips of those hosts doing so? so at the end of the day, the only argument anyone makes is 'well they must have felt guilty b/c they settled.' imo, due to the lack of evidence wherein their hosts were liable, the more likely reason they settled is b/c they were afraid of internal documents and directives. just my guess though

all the reporting (from sources on both sides) have called them 'cluster bombs'. whatever the case, it doesn't seem to be a good thing. and that Russia isn't involved in the treaty makes little difference imo. the result is the same.

GWN, can you follow it up with substance? maybe answer the question? pretty funny how all the lefties lost their collective mind at the same time elon was changing posting/information policy and not allowing the WH to determine messaging. the audacity! i mean it only involved elections and medical information during a effin pandemic. so yes, say it out loud. say why the left largely roots for twitter/elon to fail.

My point in all this is not get anyone to like Tucker, but to say that if you think he isn't effective, you're nuts. to be fair though, it's kinda easier nowadays. you have CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC etc etc all espousing fake science and whack ass ideas all you need to do is be sane and have a slot and you're good.

what did he admit he lied about? sincere question. the Dominion stuff seemed to focus on Maria Bartiralmo

TASS is my go-to

what do you mean 'in twitters market' ? twitter had crapped out pre-Elon for sure. anywho, when i asked for examples, i was referencing 'fired b/c they mocked him'. outages happen. if you blame it entirely on Elon.... you're just lying to yourself.

the most recent outage...what caused it based on his directives? sincerely don't know? assume it was a volume issue. i wasn't affected by it and didn't know it happened until the next day.

Rasta, the adults are talking now...about different sources of information...in a mature conversation. please go watch Steve Harvey and fall off your dock.

can you provide examples? i am unaware of this.

i have read that they were fired b/c they didn't need that many coders and engineers. are you saying that is not accurate? and then are you saying there is something in the reason for their firing that makes the current situation poetic?

"You have to keep reading." WHERE?! you've posted nothing of substance! when pressed, went full ad hominem. you post that recipe right now, you prick

Rasta, i'm not 'projecting emotions'. i'm asking you questions based on your previous posts. to which you keep replying with things about my height and emotions lol. if you could post something in response with thought and substance that would be great. if not, please post your grilled wing recipe and we'll call it even.

There it is: my point is that people were using teh initial number as a prop up for how much better Tucker was going to do on Twitter vs. Fox News that is a good point and valid thesis i would have said nothing if you opened with that. (not that i believe it to be a foregone conclusion). although this "Tucker's success was a product of Fox News, not of anything special about Tucker" doesn't necessarily have to be true also.