ugarles

Not to mention, these are preseeds and subject to change. If Binghamton wants to press the issue, now is when they would do it, not before the conference applies their formula.

But Cardenas gets home-field advantage.

i'm still on the fence about that. the rules may say that swisher didn't earn back points based on a technical understanding of when neutral danger or change of control applies but even i thought those were two points in spirit for swisher.

I put together a quick Cornell-centric preview here.

nvm

7-6 or 8-7. i think fernandez had the early lead and held on.

Vincenzo Joseph was the 2x defending champ and ML took a couple of first semester losses, so i think he was reasonably considered a year away.

Mekhi Lewis had also just won a world juniors gold. i don't think his being an impact wrestler was a surprise; i think making a run to the title from the 8 seed as a freshman was a surprise.

Travis Lee 4x AA and two nattys out of Hawaii.

Honestly, this is really the only big one (though I expect more will be wrong because you aren't Rain Man. I don't think EIWA will consider his record at 157, so his resume is going to be thin. This is probably not wrong about where he would be ranked non-statistically, but his seeding will probably take a hit from the late-season weight change.

Was curious about the Ivy/non-Ivy split in allocations and, using @SetonHallPirate as a reference, this is what I get: 125: Ivy 2, Non 3 133: Ivy 2, Non 3 141: Ivy 2, Non 2 149: Ivy 2, Non 2 157: Ivy 2, Non 1 165: Ivy 1, Non 4 174: Ivy 3, Non 3 184: Ivy 4, Non 3 197: Ivy 3, Non 3 285: Ivy 2, Non 6 Both sides of the split earned allocations at every weight. I think both sides are going to be fine but I'm still going to miss the big conference when my little six-team cluster holds a one-day tournament (but maybe a little less if they hold it close to my house more often than EIWA did).

correct, so they can ID and then ID again in wrestlebacks, which is what I said, but was disagreed with by someone who was conflating the specific nomenclature of two separate categories.

If you MFF, you are done. If you MFF in the first round of the main bracket OR get an injury default in the top of the bracket and MFF in the first round of consy, you have not participated in two matches and will not be eligible for an at-large.

Yes you can, per the NCAA rulebook for 23-24 and 24-25. I've checked, and there's nothing that says you can't do it twice in one event.

According to the EIWA website, Swisher is at 149 (like everyone has been saying) and Revano is going 157 at the conference tournament. WrestleStat has it fixed now too.

Interesting. Thanks.

if she grows into 125 over the four years i'd love to see her take a shot at one of the early season tournaments with JuCo and DIII entrants with the men's varsity like the occassional women's soccer/NCAA kicker crossover.

i think the NQ notation on guys for this year is a programming mistake tbh. the site hasn't included a NQ notation for the current year until bids were handed out until this season, and the site has had the notation all season - well before any formula could have determined it. i am pretty sure that they eliminated the :01 injury default workaround that Nick Suriano took advantage of. you have to wrestle two matches at the conference tournament to be eligible for an at-large now.

a lot easier to avoid injury when you're always on top

This hurts but I can't disagree. Real bummer that he would have been AA as a freshman but for a bullshit restart against Christian Lance in R12.

if he wants to go with a winner he should check out grand view

nvm

what was their win%, at weight, against other D-1 wrestlers who are not Hokies?

his name is crook and he got robbed. just a very stupid joke.

Kind of ironic that if Crook doesn't miss the Virginia dual and beats Gioffre, he gets an allocation. Now he has to outlast him at ACCs.