Jump to content

MLB9

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    409

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by MLB9

  1. MLB9
    What are you doin, why? I don’t know if trolling or not, but it’s just a ridiculous take. You said the same thing last year and I believe the only team that outscored them in the lighter weights was NC State. But yeah, like dragot said, there’s five more weights that make the team where they’re unparalleled. I just don’t understand why you continue to take these shots.
  2. MLB9
    I’d say if they lose two of their three blood round matches and five of the seven semis, could still be iffy. A failure rate like that might keep things open deeper into Saturday. But also depends of course on what Nebraska and OSU do. If Nebraska keeps having rounds like they just had, could still be in doubt to start tomorrow.
  3. MLB9
    Which match? It happens and “holding on” is typical for him after some more dynamic stuff in 1st periods. But he’s consistently pretty solid in those situations. You’ve seen what he’s done to Taylor this year and how he finished last year, he’s a legit 1 seed Anyway, that was the most disappointing one this session to me.
  4. MLB9
    Yeah it was weird, he didn’t have much left partway through the 2nd Period. I thought Lilledahl would struggle with the Seymour/Smith winner, still projected him as a slight favorite. He’s a completely different guy against those body types
  5. MLB9
    I don’t know what’s goin on with Kasak, but everything else for the most part kinda going as expected. Barr just looked really good, that was a beat down
  6. MLB9
    The Nits falling apart a bit. Brucey was right too, just happening one round later. Nebraska having a great round and Okie pretty solid. Looking interesting right now
  7. MLB9
    Haha touche’, both very true
  8. MLB9
    Surprised he’s out there, gotta respect that. Even more that he kept going at BIG’s
  9. MLB9
    Felt that way with Hamiti a couple weeks ago, not sure he can get away with it again and again. There’s a reason he’s KOT though, the dude finds a way. That’s why the Carr semi from last year still shocks me
  10. MLB9
    If Barr’s close to healthy, should be a 10/10 round and 9/10 on bonus. Has the early makings of a 100 point gap again
  11. MLB9
    Number three, right? Van Ness, Kasak, Haines
  12. MLB9
    Well it’s a double elimination tournament as some schadenfreuders found out after Kasak’s 1st round loss last year, so who knows. If each wrestler here lost the next successive match where applicable, is that what you’re getting at? I thought you’d at least know most guys have to lose twice. I’d guess it would still be enough to win. It’s just too unlikely Jimmy that it would occur twice that quickly for all but Davis, maybe.
  13. MLB9
    Iowa and Nebraska, I do not have a heart of peace like the noble Elevator
  14. MLB9
    Could you also say, based on these statistics, that Mesenbrink and Steveson are the only two wrestlers who are favorites against the field in their respective weights? And in the 70’s, that’s a big gap
  15. MLB9
    Me too, it’s gonna get wild. Especially if Penn State is looking to add down low or up top if the right guy becomes available
  16. MLB9
    I wonder if coming back closer to home and ASU or UVU would be near the top. He would have been a starter at a lot of schools this year, probably a little more under-the-radar because he wasn’t
  17. MLB9
    I would think Luchas Cochran is leaving Penn State, he was in the Senior Day photo. I think he’d have a decent shot at being a future AA
  18. MLB9
    You’re a data wizard, we’re doing a basic probability and statistics unit at school right now and I show the kids some of your work. We have a Penn State, Iowa, and DT/OSU fan all in class so they like to see the stats. Well, one of them these days for sure lol. I always be sure to give credit and copyright to wrestleknoweverything
  19. MLB9
    Can you calculate the likelihood of that outcome(both having two) based on your expectations of 2.7 and .6? You’d have to run it off the same distributions and standard deviations you used to find those numbers in the first place, right? For the record, I’m taking the over for both of 3 and 1
  20. MLB9
    By using the word “likely” you are using probability, and inherently objectiveness, and that is just not a fact. Wkn’s done all the work for you already. You’ve done so well this last week, now I’m concerned again.
  21. MLB9
    I’m still fascinated by the Georges St. Pierre wrestling/grappling evolution in MMA. The bouts against Matt Hughes and other former collegiate wrestlers were really interesting
  22. MLB9
    I watched a video a while back with Georgio where he almost got taken down by a New York wrestler that placed at state or maybe even won a title, Sean something. GP said it was the closest he’s been to getting taken down so far.
  23. MLB9
    Also not realistic, but Utah Valley.
  24. MLB9
    Against the field in that quad(group of 16), it’s unlikely he makes it to that point. He’s not even the highest seed(Robinson). So statistically I’d say no. Lilledahl getting to that point is no gimme either, if he makes it to Smith/Seymour it’ll likely be very close.
  25. MLB9
    Absolutely, it’s set up as a 1a vs. 2b and 1b vs. 2a cross-conference. Less familiarity and very ideal for fans, not sure what the problem is.
×
×
  • Create New...