Bigbrog

On a different note...did you all hear what the VP said about the report...yep..."it's political"...she is beyond not smart...our "leadership" is a freaking laughingstock

When I first read the tweet it didn't even cross my mind that Goetz was praising Putin, but after you said something I went back and re-read it...and nope still didn't think he was praising him. LOL...rassin you! Truly I didn't take it as praise but can see how someone may have thought that...especially if they didn't like Goetz.

Wow

I always liked Dan Crenshaw when I have heard him speak; however, I have not heard anything he has said recently.

Agreed with this; however, their post have never once been in support of the people of Israel.

I think there are people on here that don't provide anything to the topic at hand or the argument except to try and nitpick peoples post. If you don't feel like UB and the new guy are being antisemitic then say it and explain why. To me, if someone constantly bashes Israel without any sort of shade thrown at the terrorist organization who started this whole mess, yes, that person could be considered an antisemite. It'd be like someone constantly bashing the law enforcement groups that raided a bunch of KKK compounds after the KKK did horrific acts of violence to innocent minorities and then got in a shootout where innocent woman and kids were killed, and that person said nothing about what the KKK cowards did to deserve the raid. Would you think that is fine, and the person bashing law enforcement isn't a racist POS? Funny part is in theory I agree with what you said.

Yeah...I don't get into to much of the legal crap around Trump and little Biden, especially nowadays, but this one interests me.

What state are YOU in....oh wait....

Well...bye

Agreed...and I am sure I have contributed to it. Hard not responding some of UB's take on things.

Did you create an account just to be an antisemite??

So who cares what Hamas did/does....and attack the people that were ATTACKED!! Another antisemite!

Sometimes these arguments become so tiresome when people bog them down with ASSumptions and semantics. I have not read on here that anyone said, including me, there shouldn't have been and shouldn't be amendments to the constitution. What I hear people say is that the basis of it and the intent of it should be the first priority and changed, following the prescribed process to do so, instead of just throwing it out the window because of some political ideology and people thinking "it doesn't fit any longer". It does fit in its intent and shouldn't be changed without extreme vetting and interrogation.

What book did you read again that makes you think you know more than everyone else??

People...including me...have told you over and over why stacking the SCOTUS is stupid and un-needed. And don't change what I said or claim I said something I didn't...I never said that the constitution was infallible? It is an amazing document that has been amended for things that were really horrible things and deemed no longer acceptable in our society. Because you don't like the political lean of the current SCOTUS you want to change everything. But if it was leaning the other way I bet you would be arguing why it shouldn't ever change.

It's been amended moron!!! Tell us again how smart you are....

You are a moron...what a freaking stupid question...

THE CONSTITUTION!!!

It's the freaking basis and what grounds us a country...holy crap! You hate that murder is illegal because it says so in the bible?? SMH....

Enough said...

Valid

Instant zero credibility when an internet key board warrior says something like this...LOL Next you will list your degree's, your work history, how smart you are without anyone being able to confirm or deny it...what a freaking weak argument...but not totally unexpected from you. Go read a book and then come back and tell us how you are instantly now an expert...LOL

No mention of the D's doing the same thing and playing the same game on this very issue due to TDS a few years ago?? Didn't think so... On issues like this I think it is stupid to lump other things in the bill...I understand the need to do it to have somewhat collaboration, but this just seems crazy to have funding for wars built into the bill...but that is a whole other topic. Still waiting to hear if anyone knows what happens to the 5000+ people that are allowed in...are they vetted? Just let them in? Also, what is the additional $$$ for more agents going to be used for? Patrol? Vetting the 5000+? Other? All of the above?

So what YOU believe in should be imposed on others...got it! When you start your argument with a statement completely contradicting yourself...and then a statement that is completely wrong and weasel worded you lose all credibility..."essentially banning abortion completely"...before I ask you to tell me what states have done so I guess I should ask what your definition of "essentially" is. And because you think majority of people in NY and LA lean one way it is the "majority" of how every single state feels you again lose any sort of credibility. The SCOTUS decision didn't ban a thing...they gave states the power to decide on the issue....which constitutionally is the right decision. I too don't care what AJ's personal believes are, and I too don't want someone to push them on me PERSONALLY...but decisions/policies to me are based on personal opinion/data/logic...couldn't care less if the politicians who made those decisions/policies go to church or not.