Offthemat

Id like to have seen them move those NYC and DC trials to Lawton, OK and see how they turned out.

“Most assuredly, and failed to register with FARA, also.” This is pertaining to the Podestas. In the meantime, 40 FBI reports showing bribery and corruption by biden family. Investigation shut down. No SWAT teams. Nothing to see here, folks.

You’re missing it on the parking lot bombing.

He didn’t sell it to him. What would he want to buy polling data for. He showed it to him in aspiration of being hired, like it was a portfolio - here’s what I’ve done, and you should hire me. He was about as much Ukrainian as Russian. Not a lot of difference, you know. Most assuredly, and failed to register with FARA, also.

Again, blinders. What did Manafort do that the Podesta brothers didn’t do?

You might enjoy this one, too: https://rumble.com/v3roe84-rep.-tim-burchett-if-you-dont-see-gods-hand-in-this-then-youre-not-paying-a.html

Evidence of blinders, here. Corruption? Not even close. Each one has an example of a dimocrat action or activity that matches but was handled differently.

And churches.

SWAT arrest of Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, Mark Houck, the raid on Mar-a-Lago, the murder of Craig Robertson, to name a few examples. Every charge/indictment of Donald Trump.

That’s certain to be one of your fallacies, changing the emphasis and meaning of the term ‘respecting.’ You’ll have to look up which one. It’s well known that the Court has been wrong in numerous of its rulings. But historically, from the beginning of this country, the government has contributed to religious establishments without establishing a State Religion. And the Court has rarely found it to be in violation of the Constitution. The one that allows freedom of religion, not seclusion from religion. By your implications, NGOs and non-profits (that don’t pay taxes) would be excluded for the off chance they would benefit a particular group, when that is often the goal. The situation has simply never been as you describe.

I’d say three - you’re keeping count.

In case it’s not clearly obvious to you, nobody believes you. Being you freely admit being a communist, marxist, do you also admit being a Nazi, or will you just decline to deny it?

No need to feel lonely, lots of opinions got blown away yesterday.

Do you condemn hamas?

I was addressing the claims that it was a moment of magnificence when biden withdrew from Afghanistan and some points about why we were so invested.

And what is the enemy of my enemy. The ‘net can take you to released FBI files that document connections between Iran and Hamas and al qaida. It’s not secret that muslims band together against the little satan and the great satan.

Matt Gaetz describes the situation: https://rumble.com/v3rloms-rep.-gaetz-mccarthy-camp-sabotaged-mike-johnsons-speaker-vote-to-protect-dc.html

What is Hamas? They eventually booted him out. He was only in Pakistan a few years before he was found.

Conspiracy? Theories?

An aspect pointed out yesterday, of all these pleas, none will result in a conviction record as long as their probations are not violated.

Maybe early on, but by the time Barry got to it, ben laden was in Iran.

“Afghanistan is the right war.” Barry Soetoro

I can’t do much about your ignorance of history. But your stating that we must maintain freedom from religion is demonstrably wrong. Somewhat recent Supreme Court ruling to that effect. You may not know it, but religious schools, charities, adoption services, etc get funding currently. George W had a hand in returning to this practice. It’s not an establishment of anything, it’s recognizing that aiding a program that is already in place is more efficient than creating a whole new one.

Only this: https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2023/10/my-cousin-dean.php

You may say that they ‘fear’ that their children are being groomed, but the meaning in that context isn’t fear. It’s more like see, realize, understand and are enraged. That’s why they stand and confront the people who are responsible for it. Constitutionally, there is no restriction to public funding of religious entities. There has been much bastardization of a phrase from a letter. In our country’s early stages there was significant government funding of religious schools. The performance of charter schools is easy to find, here’s one example: “The researchers demonstrate that these learning gains were realized by tens of thousands of charter school students across the country, and progress was particularly strong among Blacks and Hispanics and those living in poverty. The study notes that these gains show that it is possible to achieve positive learning outcomes at scale and accelerate growth for students who have been inadequately served by traditional public school systems.” https://www.hoover.org/research/charter-schools-new-evidence-student-success-matter-fact-national-charter-school-study-iii They may not have been tested on their ability to condomize a cucumber, though.