Teemer is back wrestling - perhaps not 100%. Woodcock up 9-8 going into the third and has 1:45 riding time. gets a quick escape. 10-8 Woodcock with a point now nearly locked
more bad news for the sun devils. Teemer was losing to Woodcock and then just laid on the mat before Woodcock shrugged and now we are in injury timeout.
I really couldn't tell. I though he was shaking his arm in a strange way - as if to try and shake off pain - but then the way he went down, seemed to be awkward regarding his legs. and then he tapped the mat when he went down. really not sure
What about Tanelli? He's done well with limited options at Columbia - has history with the team. Similar haircut to Bono to the point where you could probably just keep the same headshot up on the website
alright I was mostly giving you guys a hard time but wanted to say my piece. they've actually already changed seeds on several weight classes this evening so it's probably a good thing I waited. I'll post it up in a moment
brother I don't care about X as a matter of principle - I view it purely as a matter of utility. It is a very common place for news to be shared. I might think the most common. I follow as many wrestling sources as I can find (combined with other interests like economics, regional food items, as well as lost cities). It's pretty wild. You can follow whatever you want, but for me its a news aggregator among my core interests
I'm not sure if changing screen names is even possible, but it would be great stakes for the next big wager: loser changes their screen name to X Donkey
If it's not out of a reasonable principle, then since its free, easy to sign up, and readily accessible, I think I'm doing the right thing by you in encouraging you to sign up rather than providing the fish itself
haha I have it all copied and pasted ready to post, but that reason isn't good enough to press submit. I don't like to let people off the hook for the intended sacrifices they intended on making if it was out of principle - you know - in order to help support them in their mission
I'm not sure what the consensus will be, but I would expect Brooks to defeat AJ Ferrari 7 or 8 times out of ten. If they only face two or three times, Brooks could easily sweep the series. Primarily because I think Ferrari hasn't shown enough high level offense to compete with someone like Brooks.
I was kicking around on Excel and trying to think of a solution for the problem of too many subscriptions. Because of the natural limitations of fewer people that know about or care about wrestling, this solution would not be extremely profitable (and that's not really its design). It would also need software development in the initial capital outlay to design the interface with each feed, as well as ongoing support (probably absorbing any possible profit). It's designed to help streamline. But I wonder if customers could essentially get away with paying closer to $50 a month for access to all wrestling channels instead of the current 64.29 that they pay. Simplification + small savings for the customers. Each channel in the model below is accepting a lower fee from the platform for subscriptions, provided that it can guarantee 500 new users. This is completely back of envelope but just something I was thinking about when I had too much coffee
Yes that is the annual rate - which I find to be among the best deals in college wrestling over the last several years. I don't know if they offer a monthly rate, but worth looking into for someone who didn't want the full season