Danny Deck

Haven't listened to this episode yet, but here's an example of all of the things GLP1s have shown promise for. I know there can be significant weight rebound if you go off Ozempic, but I wonder about it's use in some of these others. Like if you use it to abstain from recreational drug use for a year, will you be able to stay off those if you go off a GLP1? Certainly it seems to me like the effect could be more durable since cocaine is more optional than food.

As with weight loss from just diet, I think you have to be careful that you maintain muscle mass and I wouldn't be surprised about bone density as well. A quick search found this: The researchers found that people who took a GLP-1 receptor agonist had reduced hip and spine bone mineral density when they didn’t exercise, compared to people who took a placebo or just exercised. “These findings suggest that the addition of exercise to GLP-1 RA treatment is an effective weight loss strategy while preserving bone health,” the researchers wrote. Study: Weight Loss Drugs Like Ozempic Could Trigger Bone Loss Resistance training is super important.

You asked about a raw number, that's what I went looking for. I'm not usually trying to cherry pick for my advantage, I'm trying to better understand a situation. Next time I will try to predict what you want not just what you say.

Several other GLP1s have been approved for weight loss. I was using Ozempic as a stand in for the class of drugs as the most well known. The initial studies for other behaviors have been very positive and fascinating.

I didn't say anything was. But you should use all the tools in the toolbox. Ozempic has shown strong benefits far beyond just weight control and helps people have healthy lifestyles.

The time period was the previous administration. It looks like there were lots of arrests happening before. I would imagine 2024 data is not complete on this chart.

4/5 were arrested under the previous administration and 2 by local law enforcement. I imagine being part of an international gang with operations in a number of states aids your ability to avoid capture.

And yet, he's anti-Ozempic.

Of the 6 in the video, it looks like 1 was arrested in Aurora in September by Aurora PD, 2 by DHS in NYC in November, 1 in Aurora in December by Aurora PD, and now this guy in NYC by DHS. 1 remains at large.

Aren't the incentives bad? High performing employees with options choose to leave and low performing employees without options choose to stay?

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/karoline-leavitt-condoms-gaza-doge-b2688322.html

From what I can tell, the 300K number comes from an Inspector General Report in 2024. It appears, to me, that what happened was a lot of unaccompanied minors were released to sponsors in the US without a scheduled court date. So they are living in the US but are not working their way through any kind of process to either become a permanent resident or be deported. YMMV on how much difference you see between "missing" and "unmonitored" in this context. "Located" also seems pretty ambiguous. I can't find much on this beyond the TV hit that Faulkner did stating Tom Homan told her as much. How are they defining it? Based on how I interpret the IG report, "located" could mean we sent a notice to appear to the address given when they were released. It could be something more than that. It is good these kids are being located and make their way through the system. Hopefully there are other reforms to improve communication between DHS and HHS to prevent the ball dropping like this in the future. Here is the PDF IG report: https://www.oig.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/assets/2024-08/OIG-24-46-Aug24.pdf

The debates prior to passage contemplated this issue and it passed anyway. "Senator John Conness from California, the state most impacted by Chinese immigration, favored a broad definition of citizenship was perhaps influential. Conness supported the idea "that the children of all parentage whatever, born in California, should be regarded and treated as citizens of the United States, entitled to equal civil rights."' He stated further that the Senate should take no further trouble on account of the Chinese in California or on the Pacific coast. We are fully aware of the nature of that class of people and their influence among us, and feel entirely able to take care of them and to provide against any evils that may flow from their presence among us. We are entirely ready to accept the provision proposed in this constitutional amendment, that the children born here of Mongolian parents shall be declared by the Constitution of the United States to be entitled to civil rights and to equal protection before the law with others." PDF Link: https://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1115551/files/fulltext.pdf

Are purchases of these coins public?

He was an unsuccessful nominee to the Supreme Court in 1970. McGovern said of him, "I find his record to be distinguished largely by two qualities: racism and mediocrity." Senator Hruska responded with the above.

"Even if he [Carswell] were mediocre, there are a lot of mediocre judges and people and lawyers. They are entitled to a little representation, aren't they? We can't have all Brandeises and Frankfurters and Cardozos."

All I can say is Liberty Football has some 'splainin' to do.

I believe laws should be enforced. I'm not qualifying that.

Here is what he has to certify to. Do you believe any of this to be true? A) a path to executing a qualified divestiture has been identified with respect to such application; (B) evidence of significant progress toward executing such qualified divestiture has been produced with respect to such application; and (C) there are in place the relevant binding legal agreements to enable execution of such qualified divestiture during the period of such extension.

1. That reads to me like that would have had to have been granted prior to the ban going into effect 2. No progress toward a divestiture has been made with TikTok stating they would shut down before they sold.

Do you believe the president unilaterally choosing to not enforce laws is good or bad?

"App stores and service providers face a daily $5,000 fine for every user who can still access TikTok, and those penalties easily add up to billions of dollars." If this is just calculated on Oracle being on the hook for everyone with it installed in the US, they're already facing a fine in the billions after one day.

Looks like Oracle is trusting Trump that they won't be subject to the fines associated with the law, but Apple and Google are not. They have not restored the app to their app stores. Tom Cotton has assured them Trump doesn't have the authority to do what he says and they will be subject to the fines.

Supreme Court upholds the ban.