GreatWhiteNorth

Yawn... Raging frauds that have jokes - are still nothing more than raging frauds.

Let's get this straight: This is easy to figure out. If he's convicted of rape, then it's because he's a rapist. Otherwise, he's not. It does, however, kill some of your conspiracy theory BS.

Ban is right, it's not that hard to figure out what is news - but it requires that people use a nominal filter. Which some do. Your post here is super weak. You attack the "leftist media" with your comments, as being somehow equivalent to click bait. That is clear bias. Any clown could say the same about either party. You have no business analyzing the legitimacy of news sites. 'Broad spectrum of sources' - Your advice is to "learn" from sources with obvious bias (including those supported by enemy foreign states? Even if that fact is not evident for most internet users?) Worst advice possible on the topic. You are merely encouraging people to consider garbage sites - those that are funded by the enemies of the US, and are specifically designed to divide and anger US citizens. It's terrible advice. I never really noticed you here. But now that I see you, you seem to be quite a raging fraud.

As lawyers say, "Ignorance is not a defense." At least not a very good one.

Not the journalists. It's the internet hacks who are in it to get clicks - don't have any information, lead potential readers to their sites with headline 'bait' that turns out to have nothing to do with the actual 'articles' at the site. Doesn't matter to them, the more outlandish the garbage they use the better from their perspective, they literally get paid by the click. If you click it, they are paid. Yet, people read these things and often don't even know they've been duped. These hacks are obviously not journalists. Yet they claim to be news. Worse yet, it's the foreign government sponsored sites. They don't care about the clicks, they only care about trying to convince (in our case) US citizens that our country is in deep trouble and, blah blah blah <insert whatever thing they want us to believe here>. Even if we many aren't duped, they only need enough to be duped to create a rift. What is valuable to them, is that they want US citizens to stop trusting mainstream news. Even though the site is complete garbage, if they can get some to start to distrust- it's a win for them. They want the chaos that mistrust and arguing creates - this is the biggest problem. These people are obviously not journalists either. Yet they claim to be news. It's a lot like some of the far left blame the cops for our social problems. The cops are NOT the problem. Similar thing here - the far right blames the journalists for our news problems. The journalists are NOT the problem. (And it's not a R vs D problem either. It exists across parties. It's primarily a "stop getting your news from the internet" problem.)

... and it kept getting worse after that. This 'Pa in Taiwan' is 100% turd.

In any reputable establishment, the headlines match the article. Period. Full stop. If you read headlines that 'don't match' the article - the site isn't credible. You've been duped. Stop reading and stop going there. The crazy thing is that so many people have been duped for so long, that they consider it somewhat normal. It isn't. It isn't normal and it isn't factual. This would go a long way in explaining why so many here believe ideas that they've read on illegit sites.

My guess is that there would be a mass exodus from Twitter/X. Just a hunch. Switching to a subscription model may well be the quickest way to kill any popular free internet site.

Blab all you like, won't change a thing. You're just another turd selling the US is behind 9/11 BS. Nothing more.

The disgusting one where you claim the US is behind the 9/11 attacks!? Never. That was a miserable post. You are a POS for making the claim. You can't hide it from it, you posted it.

We're at a message board, not a poker table. There are no 'turns'. Are you brainless and not from the US? (Don't get too worked up about my questions, they are rhetorical.)

Thanks for the translation - I would have otherwise had no idea what you meant by "eat the shit" Quite scholarly of you.

As a regular nutjob here, you are surely familiar with obtuse.

You're backing the other nutjob poster who believes the CIA was behind the 9/11 attack. That's just perfect. What country are you actually from?

Well... there goes the neighborhood.

Now you are showing your true colors: You, 'Offthemat', claim the CIA was somehow behind the 9/11 attack. Truly disgusting post.

Fair point - in the interest of credibility, even if only for you, I'm updated my post. [EDIT] Jross's post was not: try not to only eat shit from the USA. It was actually: try not to only eat the shit the USA news feeds us.

You post Chinese propaganda and tell us we should learn from it? Then you tell us you "love the USA" (Wait, it gets better) Then you tell us you try not to only eat shit from the USA. If anybody thought jross was a credible poster. "Here's your sign."

"Saw it mentioned"... followed by junk post. Oh, ok.

Retail theft is a HUGE problem. What's crazy is that some try to represent this as a sort of weird R vs D topic... when it really isn't. It's a giant problem for all, regardless of politics. It's like car-jacking - these are really big, really bad problems. That we need to get together to solve instead of wasting our efforts bickering over laying blame. I don't see anything constructive, at all, in trying to make this an R vs D topic. I would think you'd all feel the same.

Political tit-for-tat at a time when politicians shouldn't be wasting their time on this crap. Hey politicians in Congress... quit screwing around and get back to work. (Both parties. This isn't D vs R, it is just common sense.)

Thx - I've been working out. Hard work pays off. Good message for you children everywhere.

The USA is the most exceptional country in the world. Without any doubt. Anything else you posted after that is blah-blah, pro-Putin BS. It is cringe-worthy that you even reference Putin. As I've already posted - "Putin is a deranged, horrible, evil leader. What he's doing is despicable" Take that crap somewhere else.

You posted a concern that "The USA government treats other countries as second-class." That was your post, not mine. It is VERY strange that you now flip-flop and try to justify the previous president's treatment as somehow "relatively accurate". Make up your mind. (Preferably before you post.)

I don't see your point, at all. Our system of law includes lawyers bringing charges against citizens that they believe, and have evidence that, they have broken the law. (That should be obvious - but I'll state it to help you out.) What happens next is that the judicial system is activated to determine the validity of the charges and any next steps. That is how it works, and how it has worked since our great country has existed. What don't you respect about our country, our Constitution, or our judicial system?