Jump to content

1032004

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    8,464

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    18

 Content Type 

Everything posted by 1032004

  1. 1032004
    Except for maybe some stalling inconsistency at 133, I thought he did a good job. I don’t believe VT challenged at all, and there really didn’t seem to be complaining from the coaches.
  2. 1032004
    Who said he wouldn’t be in top 16? He is just another in a long line of wrestlers to move up from 197 to HWT and do just as good or better, proving that there is no need for a weight between 197 & heavyweight
  3. 1032004
    Bastida might have the best chance of beating Kerk, but still unlikely
  4. 1032004
    Well whoever is seeded 33 at 125 could have a shot at winning
  5. 1032004
    Honestly I just remembered I wrote in a different thread that I wouldn’t be shocked if they got 7. But then I did the math and the probability based on my own personal odds was like 0.1%, so I guess that “should” be shocking. But that was a few weeks ago and my odds for Bartlett and Haines would increase since then.
  6. 1032004
    I would not be surprised to see 6 champs, in fact I bet many PSU fans will predict it. I think 7 or more would qualify as “shocking” though
  7. 1032004
    How about if they get 7+ champs?
  8. 1032004
    Well that would give him an extra match and artificially inflate PSU’s team score
  9. 1032004
    Based on the seeding criteria, you may be right, as Kerk will have the coaches ranking (15%), but an undefeated Big 12 champ could have the quality wins (20%). Not sure about RPI though (10%). But I know they are able to override the formula sometimes.
  10. 1032004
    174 is a little more top heavy to me. I’d be surprised if Arnold got higher than 4th at 174, I would not be surprised if he makes the finals at 184. I do think Kennedy 174/Arnold 184 is their best tournament team, but I don’t get paid the big bucks.
  11. 1032004
    Maybe we can save our seniors some money by cancelling their cable and having them sign up for Fubo or something + one month of FloFootball
  12. 1032004
    Yeah just tried to check and looks like 1989 was the last time, ironically Tom Brands freshman year and Iowa only took 6th
  13. 1032004
    If Plott majors him, I can almost guarantee he stays in redshirt. He likely stays in redshirt if he loses at all. Even if he wins, he might stay in redshirt, but I’d guess he goes if he beats Plott.
  14. 1032004
    I think he burns the shirt if he beats Plott. If he does, then while it’s not guaranteed, he’d have a good shot at placing top 4.
  15. 1032004
    Well earlier in the year he publicly stated that answer was no. But he may have changed his mind of course…
  16. 1032004
    I think this is pretty much the same as the Hidlay thread. “People aren’t talking about” them potentially winning the Hodge, because they are huge underdogs to even win their weight, which is a prerequisite for winning the Hodge
  17. 1032004
    That’s different than the OP though, which seems to be complaining about “Hodge rankings” which shouldn’t factor in their likelihood of finishing the season undefeated. My earlier comment was if those are Flo’s Hodge rankings, they may be considering the All-Star as a loss for Hendrickson
  18. 1032004
    So it’s not free for you
  19. 1032004
    Are you really just saying he “doesn’t have a snowflake’s chance in hell” of beating Kerk? I’d give him a “snowflake’s chance” of doing that. Which if so, would give him a slightly bigger (but still small, due to the presence of Brooks & Kerk) chance of winning the Hodge
  20. 1032004
    Was it free or only free if you had cable?
  21. 1032004
    Yeah and on the 1000th episode Pyle also reiterated how mad he was at Askren for doing that. I’m confident Pyle was not in on it
  22. 1032004
    I believe Flo includes the All-Star in their rankings, no?
  23. 1032004
    When Rathjen got the second takedown, was Bono still yelling about the earlier call or was he mad about something else?
  24. 1032004
    Same thing IMO. I think they consider all matches against B10 competition. Could be wrong though. I would imagine they may even consider matches against non-B10 competition if there’s a tie or something and there are common opponents
  25. 1032004
    While I think they’ll consider CKLV matches (which @bracketbuster seems to agree with based on the 125 records), they will likely give more importance to duals where Van Dee beat Teske. However that probably only matters if Teske is Iowa’s entrant
×
×
  • Create New...