Jump to content

1032004

Members
  • Posts

    4,685
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by 1032004

  1. Is this that politician guy from Kansas or something that would post random stuff on themat?
  2. Although… Coaches rank has Courtney tied for 7, so keeping Lee at 1 keeps him on the opposite side. There’s probably a decent chance Courtney ends up at 6 or 7. He likely isn’t passing Lee, Barnett (lost H2H), Glory or Cardinale. 1 or 2 other B10 guys probably stay ahead of him, but he could jump the rest. Probably thinking way too much into this lol…
  3. I saw that. And Zeke had a vote for 125 too… Which is another a stupid thing about this process…each conference gets 2 votes for every weight, regardless of the size of the conference. So Zeke gets 4 votes but Cael only gets 2.
  4. It was brought up on FRL that RBY, Yianni and Kerk were not included in the first coaches rankings due to not enough matches so people (Zeke Jones it seems) may have just copied those ones exactly. Which I guess is possible
  5. Don’t they say that’s just a ranking too?
  6. Yeah I think you solved the mystery. I was going to say how would his guy benefit, but all 3 of McGee, Parco and Schultz are currently at either 4 or 5 so the clear #1 has in theory dropped to the opposite side of the bracket (at least at 133 and 149, forgot Kerk lost). But still seems stupid though, surely the other criteria would push RBY in particular back to the #1 actual seed right?
  7. I think that was a photoshopped picture of DeSanto or something
  8. Where is the list of coaches that vote for each weight?
  9. I honestly wouldn’t be shocked if Cael did it so that they realize coaches shouldn’t be doing rankings
  10. The high and low are thrown out? Does that mean 2 people left him off?
  11. He was mad he didn’t cut to 125 for the Iowa dual
  12. Rankings are not predictions. I guess wrestlestat might consider theirs kinda to be? Does the higher rated wrestler always win in their scenarios? I think a main problem with wrestlestat’s algorithm is that they put too much emphasis on results from several years ago. I believe this explains Fix over RBY, and it probably also explains Parris at pre-season #1
  13. I’m guessing I missed a joke in one of the other threads, but Steveson is next in line to be CEO? Huh?
  14. 125 is the least of the problems with Wrestlestat’s algorithm. If Daton Fix can still be #1, then something with the algorithm needs to be changed
  15. I was referring to Baylor, but I see wrestlestat did the same thing to Lewis…
  16. Wrestlestat no longer lists Fernandes as the starter…do they know something we don’t? The guy they do list as the starter is 0-3 with 2 losses by bonus
  17. But there is only one Freestyle wrestling Olympic competition. Do you think Spencer can win Olympic?
  18. Correct. Just as Olympics is an abbreviation for the Olympic Games, States is an abbreviation for State Championships
  19. My point was at B1G last year Brooks was really the only guy that did worse there than at NCAA’s. I guess you could argue Kerk, but they also had Berge get 3rd from the 10 seed. You could certainly argue Hildebrandt, who had gotten 4th the year before, “faltered” at NCAA’s by scoring half a point. They had 3.5 points total between 125, 149, 157, and 165. But they didn’t need them because they had 5 champs.
  20. Do you think Spencer Lee has a shot at winning Olympic?
  21. Good thing he didn’t transfer to tOSU then?
  22. I’d agree with OP. But more of Jimmy trying to get people to think PSU is in danger of not winning NCAA’s by claiming that Starocci and Brooks could lose
  23. Meh, Brooks was really the main guy that “faltered.” Moreso just a result of what WKN said that their teams tend to be built more for NCAA tourney success than B1G tourney success
×
×
  • Create New...