red viking

Don't need proof. WSJ doesn't make bs up, like Fox. Both owned by Rupert Murdock but he reserves his bs propaganda all for fox. I guarantee it's true. He can double down, sue, etc. That's just part for the course w him. He'll be exposed as a liar, once again.

He will lose. He lies about literally everything, so of course he will deny it. He has no choice but to sue. Anything less is basically an admission which he just refuses to do for anything. You gonna,trust Trumptard over WSJ? LMAO.

Wingers constantly assume conspiracies anytime they hear something they don't like. Good to see that some are starting to see through the bs. Have a long way to go gotta get out of the fox/breitbart echo chamber.

I hears plenty of tall tales from fellow soldiers when I was in the army for a total of 6 yrs, 3 active. I don't need to hear the bs anymore.

They reported it and I trust WSJ that they aren't going to make up bs, especially about wingers.

I actually will listen to some wingers but not the ones trying to capitalize off their military careers. They tend to exaggerate, A LOT, and have their own agendas.

No. I looked him up. That's all I need to know.

They didn't show the pic but reported exactly what it was.

The host

Open mind? The guys a total winger. Lmao.

https://www.wsj.com/politics/trump-jeffrey-epstein-birthday-letter-we-have-certain-things-in-common-f918d796?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=ASWzDAgUeZDcZ3toSUWnv1xIuBJiqwSmI5G9EbiKDRW_us2Aaq5Hp0w6BgjstxBYqdU%3D&gaa_ts=687ae973&gaa_sig=Gw2d5h88al8bbeyGh9GKPs9jM8R9ZWiVoyPzPwD-46Dp0tiTHwupeaSCmLEH8lSXWwCMsSS_cNA_LdN1rFr8eg%3D%3D

Enjoy the winger echo chamber.

Omg. Look it up. Tons of lies over the yrs. Even got successfully sued. They're pure garbage.

Wall St Journal is about as reputable as it gets. It's not like it was reported by the bs fox news.

It was a naked woman. Drew that for a known sexual predator and perv and talking about " wonderful secrets." Trump is a sicko. Deserves whatever happens to him know.

Reported by Wall St Journal. Credible. pic was a naked woman. Anatomically correct to put it mildly.

With a hand drawn picture of a naked woman. Everybody close to Epstein at that time knew he was a sexual predator that liked little girls. As somebody w 2 daughters and several nieces, i almost puked when I read this. It literally makes me sick. This is the leader of our country? And the wingers are minimizing this. We are truly morally bankrupt as a country.

Yah, his physical problems continue to mount. Definitely a concern. Not as much as his mental decline, but still a problem.

My youngest daughter likes rocks too so I gave them to her I think.

Tinguaite. Got a beautiful one from South Dakota several yrs ago.

AI Overview Coastal buildings are adapting to sea level rise through a combination of preventative measures and reactive strategies. These include elevating buildings, using water-resistant materials, implementing flood barriers, and relocating infrastructure to higher ground. Some areas are also exploring managed retreat, where they relocate infrastructure and populations away from high-risk zones. Here's a more detailed breakdown: Preventative Measures: Building Elevation: Raising buildings on pilings or stilts, or using elevated foundations, is a common method to keep structures above potential flood levels. Water-Resistant Materials: Using materials that can withstand prolonged exposure to water, such as treated wood, concrete, or certain types of metal, helps to minimize damage from flooding. Flood Barriers: Installing seawalls, levees, and other barriers can help to protect buildings and infrastructure from encroaching seawater. Setbacks and Zoning: Implementing setbacks from the shoreline and restricting new development in high-risk areas can help to reduce future exposure to sea level rise. Reactive Strategies: Managed Retreat: This involves relocating buildings and infrastructure away from areas expected to be severely impacted by sea level rise. This can include buyouts of properties or relocation programs for residents. Reclaiming Land: In some cases, low-lying land can be raised through "cut and fill" techniques, where soil or rock is moved to elevate the ground level. Infrastructure Upgrades: Existing infrastructure like roads and utilities can be upgraded to be more resilient to flooding, potentially through relocation or elevation. Wetland Restoration: Protecting and restoring natural coastal habitats like marshes and dunes can help to absorb wave energy and reduce the impact of flooding.

Not trying to censor you. It's still dumb to question it. You obviously know nothing about science.

You should read the conclusions of the article. Every university agrees, too. You blow your entire credibility when you even question that.

It's done a lot. New buildings and infrastructure along coastlines are being completed with future sea level rise accounted for. People can make informed decisions before deciding whether to buy those properties along coastlines, or move north or south. Cities like New Orleans and Miami can begin planning for the future. We can make informed decisions re: what we want to do as a society, if anything, about the anthropogenic global warming. We can start planning to grow more crops at higher latitudes, or maybe fewer at lower latitudes. List goes on and on.

I need context. I'm not aware of this claim, which was obviously not mainstream (like the current claims that man is causing global warming). Who said it, what was their qualifications and what was the exact quote because you wingers constantly take things out of context.