ionel

for what?

Don't know what you are talking about, I said nothing about "who's doing it." I see no reason to "dig deeper" they've put right their on the front page who they think the two groups are without support of data or definition.

Looks like a pretty biased site. They've already decided there's two main hate groups and then the other. Does this mean everyone in Ukraine is a hate group because they are anti Russian gov't?

Elon would like a word.

... we can discuss the best methods for smoking meat and bash liberals & conservatives all in the same sub forum. Bob & Du have really outdone themselves!

Pac1. Whoever is last one not to get out the door can have it and all copyrights, logos, images etc.

For what about a snake?

yes he is very sneaky

Never dreamt of partial derivatives?

do the math, that's about what it takes

drink 5 Bud Lights then edit your post.

... and don't forget coach Ed Ruth. Poeta found a loophole in the NCAA, sent Ruth to Croatia and brought in AOC (no not for coffee service), gives em an extra coach. Ed will be recruiting talent in Croatia and training em up on Mountain Risnjak for two years before ship'n back to Champaign-Urbana. We are calling it Illini Base Camp R.

ain't got no english niether

The knownothing stamp of approval, it says: maybe ya gotta chance ...

I am not often correct But when I am I love that Wkn acknowledges Keep posting my friends.

Its complicated. Within a university there is some revenue sharing for the "have-nots" as those bring in the big research grants are paying 55%+ overhead back to the university, some of this is passed back down to departs where "have-nots" may be able to access funds. However most is probably chewed up in admin expenses, salary, campus O&M etc. If the grant is certain Fed govt funding the overheard rate is not as large at say Land Grants cause the Feds established/funded Land Grants over the long run. There is often collaboration among universities some within conferences say B10 where 3 to 5 universities (faculty within related depts) work together on joint research and thus share the overhead or admin burden a sorta "have-not" member could kindve be a free rider. Another example a recent very large NSF project where Illinois was the lead and included Brown, Stanford and Arkansas. Seems like a odd mix, NSF sometimes wants a little diversity and yeah there's a bit of wokenes in Federal funding. Another model, preferred by some, is go directly to industry for research on industry needs etc, gonna pay the full overhead rate, grants and contract will waste a lot of time worrying about every little IP issue but more freedom to partner with others on campus or at other institutions, course industry wants results not just another publication. Ok that was my short one cup of coffee response.

maybe the key is reading it a fourth time

This looks about right.

Not true, in Illinois you can stare out your picture window one year it'll be corn and the next year will be soybeans ... diversity man. But sure, in Georgia it'll always be peanuts.

Exactly.

Wait ... rhey raised his hand ... where did you find this?

Wait a minute ... say what?

Barack asked for steak, Michelle said "you'll eat vegie egg plant and like it!" And ... well you know the rest of the story.

Bob says you shouldv've thought about that before you posted.. You have to bribe Bob with ten bags of sunflower seeds.