Jump to content

ionel

Members
  • Posts

    15,251
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    183

Everything posted by ionel

  1. Is that your two cents or are you giving us the full nickal?
  2. ahh .. maybe you should check the post from 3 hrs ago.
  3. That's correct, PhD required, you don't qualify. Moreover even if you were a scientist you would have already lost such designation because of your willingness to lie about facts. You have no credibility sorry.
  4. But does he have a foot sweep?
  5. So no to any long term research.
  6. Sure let's hear about those long term research projects he worked on in that year he spent getting a master's degree.
  7. Do we even know if Carl is still at Penn St?
  8. Maybe a PhD.
  9. Whoever claimed that a Masters in Geology makes one a scientist is a liar. Same individual also lied about who was a liar so no credibility whatsoever.
  10. You just called me a liar so go back find the post and quote it in your reply documenting the lie.
  11. Quote where I said anything about the earth cooling. You have no credibility.
  12. Jax didn't look full strength ... looked like a skinny high school kid.
  13. so ... NO.
  14. But 4th you don't have a PhD in ecology, climatology or statistics correct?
  15. Ok that there is funny!
  16. Cael was just that much better than everyone and maybe his style was less prone to injury. He had to be sick or dinged up at some point but you couldn't tell watching. It wasn't luck in his case.
  17. Not in my book. Now if he pinned, teched or majored everyone.
  18. Ahh ... pretty sure that all started before 85, I wrote a HS speech on that subject for forensics. But maybe the planet was to be doomed by 85, i had moved on to other things.
  19. Well with HS Jr's beating world champions this doesnt seem like a big ask.
  20. Is it true Captain MPhillips wrote the lyrics for this tune while researching cattails along the Texas Gulf coast?
  21. Late 80s early 90s had research meetings with climatologists, yes they had PhDs. What they were saying then is that we had just gone through a relative low variability period regarding climate etc and were now entering back into more normal (higher) variability. Now if you understand statistics, estimating models, time series etc and you are using data to estimate future events where older data is lower variability new is higher variability then you know the estimate trend can be biased by the direction of the first high variability observations. Hence not long after the new thing was global warming. Now if you understand Fed funding RFP etc they like to put out their new year RFPs in a new focused area. Hence a lot of money to study Global Warming. Well what do all the researchers do ... they write proposals to research Global Warming. Then when we find out its more of a new variability issue everyone is changing to Climate Change and hence new RFPs and new research on CC.
  22. All us commoners just wish we could be so lucky as the Captain
  23. Its just what an esteemed poster on here call summer fat. Biked down and back up for pickleball today but stopped for milk and cheese ... does that count?
×
×
  • Create New...