ionel

But not exactly "Going Off The Deep End."

sure

il est temps de lutter!

You seem to be confusing GOAT and ATG.

This is a good point but as far as any know, at this time, my statement is still accurate.

But are you really?

Well then what about Hillary, she beat Trump once in the popular vote she can do it again?

I say Kamala should be tossed salad, who's with me?

whoops!

Why don't they just plug in RFK, he's a good dem correct?

No one i know who lives in Oklahoma would move to New Jersey.

but live in the jerseys

Talk to folks that live in Stillwater.

I don't know why you had to bring fruit into the discussion.

You do realize most universities can't do that correct? Only @flyingcement can give a rock solid guarantee.

Webster can help you out on "absolute" or just keep repeating the lie and eventually all the Dems will believe you.

Exactly ... he does not have "absolute immunity" only within his constitutional authority.

“The President enjoys no immunity for his unofficial acts, and not everything the President does is official,” Roberts wrote. “The President is not above the law. But under our system of separated powers, the President may not be prosecuted for exercising his core constitutional powers, and he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for his official acts.” Doesn't sound a absolute. If you are referencing other text then please quote so we can see the qualifying language associated with the immunity.

They should get an award!

How do you invoke penalties on dead folk?

Is it true every member of SEAL Team Six as resigned?

Sure but how do you legally do that? You think a multitude of things wasn't attempted at OSU?

I didn't say "absolute immunity" and he doesn't have "absolute" now.

Not if he already had the immunity and it didn't increase size of govt. We had one President before and one President after. No one has yet created a new Department of Immunity.