ionel

There is no income, living off expenses.

That makes no sense. You don't seem to want tax revenue you just want punishment.

There is no personal income for the owner in my example. However million to billions of dollars of income and tax is generated by the business activity.

I thought they had to at least pursue an education but I'm hearing they can take a typing course and still post. Is that right?

Do we know they have a dedicated officer to follow him around, as reported in the past, to record any "incident" or should above be revised to "days without known incident?"

So its more of a jealously thing. Maybe we should enact a jealously tax, if a majority of the people vote to be jealous of someone's wealth then the government can take 25% of their assets, but maybe 25% isn't their fair share so let's make it 50% of their assets. btw: I want 50% of Wkn's best bourbon.

I've always said don't go to Iowa, glad Ben finally agrees.

Why is it a problem, they pay back the loan don't they? Let's take a billionaire like Musk, say he has no car, no house, living out of hotels. Let's say he's got 3 or 4 billion dollar businesses and is living on company expense account. He is paying sales tax etc., his businesses are generating a billion $+ of economic activity on which taxes are being paid. He could take a $million/year salary but isn't. So why does it matter that he doesn't have income and not paying income tax when he's generating all this other economic activity that does result in tax revenue?

Burr

Here's a real world example. Let say ~30 years ago I bought some farm land for $1,500/ac and its now worth $16,500/ac. In this theoretical example I've been paying the property taxes on the increasing assessed value every year along with the increasing income taxes every year. Now I'm faced with taxes on an unrealized $3M gain. How am I going to pay that? Now you could say doesn't apply since not a liquid asset but just like the $100M to $1M to &500k as Wkn indicated once politicians get their claws in a new revenue stream they will just keep expanding. But to the liquid asset point. Let's say Wkn drives down to Kentucky to purchase a full barrel of his favorite bourbon. But let's be real, if he makes the drive he's gonna fill the truck with four barrels, but I digress. As soon as he leaves the distillery for some reason that bourbon just went up in value 50%. Liquid assets, tax law applies to Wkn when is he going to pay the tax? Will he try to consume before filling taxes? Now you might ask how long would it take Wkn to consume a full barrel of bourbon but thats not the point.

Lets just tax Democrats. They love taxes and want to pay their fair share. But more importantly the rest of us want less of em. If we tax them they may dissapear.

... but what does it mean? We at least know what and mean.

Sure but sometimes ya gota accept the challenge and give it your best shot.

Twitter?

The BobDole is a combination of the old wtf & The is a combination of the old Thanks &

"Well, there are a number of things. I will tell you first and foremost one of my highest priorities is to do what we can to support and strengthen the middle class. When I look at the aspirations, the goals, the ambitions of the American people, I think that people are ready for a new way forward in a way that generations of Americans have been fueled by — by hope and by optimism.," Harris responded. We can first focus on the things we can do, if we can do these things we can hope our foremost priorities can be achieve, if we can hope for what we can do we can realize our hope and thus hope that it can be. BTW: everyone who votes for me can hope to recieve a can of soup and a mule. Lets hope now can we!

Maybe Rasta was in the wedding last night and hasn't made the morning news. Didn't think about that did ya.

So voting for Kamala doesn't mean she's stupid she's voting for Kamala because she is stupid.

You need a Red Stripe!

Ok this was evidently fact checked as false that she said it. Our rating: False Harris did not say this. The quote comes from an altered clip of her speech at a 2023 rally that has been previously debunked. But the quote of what they claim she said sounds just as bad and salady to me. “So I think it’s very important – as you have heard from so many incredible leaders – for us, at every moment in time, and certainly this one, to see the moment in time in which we exist and are present, and to be able to contextualize it, to understand where we exist in the history and in the moment as it relates."

Starocci, AOC, and Carl Sanderson walk into a bar. Are we sure it wasn't a coffee shop?

Its why I'm gonna ask for a refund. Bob's a stand up good dead senator, I'm sure he will refund my money. In all seriousness I'm sticking with Bob & Du, they've done a great job of putting this together after we lost that other forum.

But it doesn't seem fair that he losses his 5th title year. Should he really be punished just for being a jerk?

Yes: When you and Joe have ice cream together what are the flavors?