So no one knows what weight Starocci wrestled last year? Well I looked it up and if WS is correct he wrestled down at 174. Thats right he hasn't yet won a single title at 184. Moreover, last year he didn't beat either of the top 2 places who dominated the rest of the field. He also didn't beat either of those two this year at 184. He did beat 2 freshmen. So why is he seeded #1 you ask ... because it doesn't make any sense.
Here's how they should be seeded:
1 Keckeisen 2 Starocci 3 Plott 4 McEnelly
Now doesn't that look better cause Keck gets McE and Star gets Plott as it should be.
But alas we will have to deal with this crap the seeding committee pulled on us. This weight is about matchups and the semis, even though they messed it up seeding doesn't really matter.