jross

Companies will hire someone for $100K a year and not spend $5K to educate them to be more productive... so... ...do companies pay employees to configure Twitter words they want to avoid associating with? This requires constant garden work. When IBM found ads near posts they disagreed with, did they adjust their configuration? IBM is paying exponentially more to advertise than it would cost to manage the configuration. I want to believe there are words that X should provide by default... but what are they, and who chooses them? Regex-type filtering is brute force... It needs AI that also knows when words are used negatively... and has some 'trust' factor based on the poster. As a company owner, I want to target my audience with inclusion words and other filters more than exclusion words. Oracle might want to target conversations about databases for example, and roles that talk about software applications... along with popular people and posts.

Taylor and Snyder cannot stop this

When you take a two-step leadoff from first base, you are stalling and can find your way to the bench.

Property Damage BLM: $2 Billion J6: $3 Million Arrest counts BLM: 17,000 J6: 1,100 Violent Deaths BLM: 19 J6: 1 Protests with violence BLM: 570 J6: 1

Okay now compare to the violence from the other side and use data to tell me which is higher.

Please say more about x's incompetence in relation to allowing advertisers to configure what content their ads are posted in proximity to.

Is Eric a Nazi, or does he support Hitler? Is Muck agreeing with a Nazi? Does criticizing Jewish behavior, or criticizing anti-white behavior, make someone a Nazi? Have Jewish activists, ADL, etc. communities 'pushed hate' through actions that many see as anti-white?

The division is high enough for leaders to attempt this from the right or left side. Ideally, civilian sanity exists to stop it. Looking only at the risk from one angle, which side has acted more violence for their cause(s)?

By who? X, IBM, both?

Can you explain what Formerly Eric means in response to the Jewish Conservative and activist? In your own words, what do you think Musk agree with? Charles Weber / @CWBOCA To the cowards hiding behind the anonymity of the internet and posting "Hitler was right": You got something you want to say? Why dont you say it to our faces… Formerly Eric Okay. Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of dialectical hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. I'm deeply disinterested in giving the tiniest shit now about Western Jewish populations coming to the disturbing realization that those hordes of minorities that support flooding their country don't exactly like them too much. You want truth said to your face, there it is.

Oops. In March 2021, FBI Director Christopher Wray denied that there was any evidence of Antifa involvement on January 6. On my Twitter feed... Activist Antifascist John Earle Sullivan was convicted for a role on J6. Some articles about it. https://beckernews.com/55-antifa-revolutionary-who-incited-january-6-riots-found-guilty-on-all-seven-counts/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/11/16/john-sullivan-convicted-jan-6-film/ https://www.justice.gov/d9/sullivan_complaint_affidavit.pdf

CNN doing its thing. https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/15/media/elon-musk-antisemitism-white-people/index.html

Do the add placement controls not work, or are they not being used? https://business.twitter.com/en/blog/adjacency-controls-third-party-measurement.html

Are you looking at Musk or at the ad placement or both?

This thought exercise has me newly understanding why the government holds citizens accountable for reporting high crimes.

I support the father in this story. What would the father do to the clergyman if the knowing clergyman didn't report the abuse, and the abuse had continued?

Ethical nuance leads to 'the clergyman should not be protected.' Should all citizens, because of ethics, report child abuse? Are there situations where a citizen would not report child abuse because of ethics? For example, a rarely intoxicated father abuses his daughter in a one-time abuse scenario. The father's track record bears financial responsibility and good ethics... The father confesses his crime to the clergyman. As a trusted confidant, the clergyman should encourage the father to seek professional help for rehabilitation. At the same time, the clergyman should facilitate open communication within the family. A collaborative decision involving the spouse and, if appropriate, professionals can guide the family toward a resolution that prioritizes the safety and well-being of all involved. This resolution should not automatically require informing legal, and the clergyman should be protected. But what if the father's job involves time with other children (Teacher, Coach, Counselor, Priest, etc.)? All parents of other children should be informed. The father would lose his job. But what if the father gets another job with different children, given his clean background check? Absurd. Getting the incident on his police record is important to protect children. So, the clergyman should not be protected. Twist the earlier story such that the clergyman does not facilitate open communication with the family, and keeps the secret. The daughter reports the story to her mother. Mother confronts father. Father reveals he confessed to the clergyman. Mom is angry at the clergyman. The clergyman should not be protected because he didn't protect the well-being of a child who was unable to protect herself. Twist the story such that the household only includes the dad and daughter. The clergyman should not be protected because he didn't protect the well-being of a child who was unable to protect herself.

The government should not have the right to hold citizens accountable for reporting crimes. But it does. All States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the U.S. territories of American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Virgin Islands have statutes identifying persons who are required to report child maltreatment under specific circumstances. https://www.childwelfare.gov/pubpdfs/mandaall.pdf My gut says that clergy-penitent privilege (and attorney-client privilege) should not be protected.

Cael lost to these guys around high school age and perhaps more before college. Small list. Tom Meacham BYU Joe Heskett Iowa State 4xAA, National Champ Brian Burrows Oklahoma State, Prison David Kjeldgaard Oklahoma, Injured In the '90s, appearing in Sports Illustrated and Wrestling magazines was good publicity. While Cael was as good if not better than his brothers, I don't see how anyone could know he'd be a generational recruit.

Cael and Cole won their way to the 55kg World Team Trials (15/16y) in Greco and refused to wrestle each other.

Sports Illustrated for kids at 10 years old.

With Fulton County... how could it go any other way.

What a quagmire. When the IDF hits Hamas, civilians often get caught up, and more people support Hamas. When the IDF leaves Hamas alone, there's a security risk for Israel. Moving or clearing out all Gazans is a messy solution and an ethical nightmare. It's easy to make things worse no matter what the IDF does. I'd say they should go old school and have some elites intermarry... but Israel doesn't grant citizenship to Palestinians who marry in... to prevent a return from 'creeping in.'