Wrestleknownothing

I do not see Caliendo, Arnold, or Keuter as title threats.

It seems like you are looking for hypocrites with this thread. Sophie Turner - A British citizen said she might return to the UK. Not exactly shocking. Oh, and she did return to the UK. So not a hypocrite. Cher - Said she would leave, and changed her mind. Hypocrite. America Ferrera - Said she would relocate to the UK and was seen checking schools in West London for her kids. Seemingly not a hypocrite. Billie Eilish - She was cited in the article in spite of never having made the claim. Not a hypocrite. Christina Applegate - Ditto. She was cited in the article in spite of never having made the claim. Not a hypocrite. Jimmy Kimmel - Already covered above. Not a hypocrite. Billie Joel - Not even named in the article. But Billie Joe Armstrong was. Not a hypocrite. Billie Joe Armstrong - said he would renounce his citizenship in 2022 in response to Roe v Wade being overturned. Nothing to do with Trump getting elected in 2024. Not a hypocrite. The article you want to cite as a list has seven names listed (and you want to add an eighth) of which only one has done the thing you are looking for. The hypocrite in this situation is the author of the article. You have to read beyond the headline. The article does not support what is in the headline. There is a lot of talk about how the mainstream media is lying to us. But the same people who make that claim have no qualms with citing articles from the jenkiest of jenkitty sources. Talk about hypocrisy.

Clearly not or else they would be called nuns. But they both don't date, have sex, have children, or get married. The things you listed.

Explain the priesthood or being a nun.

I read the article and it appears to be a list of one. Billie Armstrong, whoever that is. And I looked up what Kimmel said. It was a skit at the open of his show after the election where he was packing his office to leave because he was on Trump's enemy list. The skit ended with him agreeing to stay and fight. Not exactly saying before the election he would leave if Trump was elected. Instead joking about it after. I was afraid the list would be something like this.

Storageunits.com?

Does All-American Nelson Brands being defeated by the art of the takedown count as an upset?

Certainly the marriage of academics and professional sport makes no sense.

#23 Tyler Knox (Stanford) 15-10 over #7 Drake Ayala (Iowa) in CHA

I will clear it up for you. What I mean is your are particularly bad at math. And at arguing your points. You do seem very good at using a random word generator.

Hmmm. GIGO.

Settle down

You are on. We are on the opposite side of 5 matches, so no way we can tie. I will give you the option of the avatar or the signature line if you win.

Not me. I am a Republican. Yes, it is identity politics, but that doesn't mean it is inaccurate. Nor do I think it is what lost Democrats the election. It is clear to me that it was a repudiation of Biden/Harris policies on the border and the economy. While I think people are wrong that Biden was completely to blame, or that anything would have been any different under Trump, with regard to inflation, there is no doubt to me that years of inaction followed by an 11th hour Hail Mary on the border problem cost them dearly. And it was a huge mistake for Biden to attempt to run again. He put the Democrats in an untenable position that forced them to field a candidate that could not defend her legitimacy.

I find it hilarious that you only want precision in the counterfactual, but not the factual.

Many of the names in the list such as Swift, Kelce, Hanks, Fonda, Penn, Soros, Fauci, and Eminem have been baselessly linked to a pledge before.

Do you never tire of being lied to? You may want to fact check that list.

I am coming out of the gate fast. Like a Jackrabbit? Jordan at 125. Bailey does it again at 133. Too much dog in Mendez for Bartlett at 141. SVN shakes off the rust and shows he used his time wisely at 149. Kasak shows it was no fluke at 157. In a coin flip it flips Garvin's way at 165. Jackrabbits may be fast, but what is their endurance? Gonna have to go Levi at 174. Satrocci invents some slight to motivate himself and beats Keck in a snooze fest at 184. My upset special is a man who cannot even spell his own name. Give me Braunagel at 197. No upset at 285. Ghadiali wil be feld by the man.

Back in the day (1920's and most of the 30's) NCAA bouts were 10 minutes. If a takedown happened in the first 2 minutes then they would go 2-4-4. If no takedown occurred in the first two minutes it was a single 10 minute period. OT's were two 2 minute periods. Not sure which these fall into, but the longest bouts I found were 13:54 in 1931 at 118 in the quarters between Stanley "Havin' A" Ball and Sumner "Always Be Moving" Forward. Ball had a ball with the pinfall. And the longest title bout lasted 12:12 two years later at 145 between Allen "Killer" Kelley and Foy "Appropriately Named" Stout. It was Stout who saw the lights that day.

I do. My daughter's pup, but we are fast friends. Then and now.

More correctly, you will never get the answer you want.

What am I scared of? Nothing. I am a wealthy white guy. I will be fine.

And your concerns were unfounded. It is time to start incorporating that into your thinking.

Congratulations. You are the proud recipient of this year's Understatement of the Year Award.

Feels like you were trying to get into the wrong bars.