Marmaduke’s New York?

[Caveira]

Zionists.  We don’t need no stinkin zionists.    Wonder how this makes the largest population of Jews in the USA feel  
 

let them riot marmaduke

 

Leftists aren’t violent for no reason 

 

 

Edited May 6 by Caveira

[Offthemat]

This was predicted. 

[Caveira]

Maybe @1032004 can answer.  Do you think Israeli businesses  should be able to thrive or be promoted in nyc?   It’s probably the largest Jewish population in North America 

 

 

[Interviewed_at_Weehawken]

14 hours ago, Caveira said:

Zionists.  We don’t need no stinkin zionists.    Wonder how this makes the largest population of Jews in the USA feel  
 

let them riot marmaduke

 

Leftists aren’t violent for no reason 

 

 

Meanwhile, many of our members claim there is no connection between their personal hatred of Israel and anti-Semitism...

[Caveira]

People are leaving cause of my crazy taxes including Ken griffin.  So what.  Double down 

 

[Offthemat]

Watched a short recap of Giuliani’s tenure as Mayor in connection with the news on his health, and it reminded me that he put clamping down on crime at the top of his agenda because of its bearing on affordability.  Crime is expensive.  Apart from from the obvious, fraud, robbery, burglary crimes that are aimed at gaining money illegally, all crime has a financial cost to everyone.  The victims may lose money, property, time, suffer injury and then there’s the cost of investigating, policing, prosecution and possibly incarceration.  But even the people not directly involved can be affected by increased taxes and insurance rates, and possibly devaluation of real property.  Prices for everything can go up in effort to recoup losses. 
 

Giuliani recognized that by cracking down on the minor crimes, jumping the turnstiles, graffiti, vagrancy, that it lowered all crime.  Partly because many of the criminals were incarcerated, but partly because criminals were hesitant, realizing they were likely to be caught and dealt with more harshly.  If Mamdummy allows the crime rate to remain high or even increase, then affordability will remain in the distance.  The shortest path to affordability is through a civil society. 
 

 

[Scouts Honor]

oh boy

how many property owners are screwed

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani has proposed a dramatic overhaul of the New York state estate tax ("death tax") to close a $5.4 billion city budget deficit. His plan would slash the exemption threshold by nearly 90%—from over $7 million to $750,000—and hike the top tax rate to 50%, potentially subjecting many middle-class homes to the tax. [1, 2, 3]

[mspart]

3 hours ago, Offthemat said:

The shortest path to affordability is through a civil society. 
 

 

The Ds currently reject that proposition.   Just look at blue cities and blue states.  There is no law enforcement.   There is no prosecution.   By no, I mean crime rates have gone up dramatically in the last 10 years and there  has not been a corresponding arrest rise or prosecution rise.   The Ds don't care about those paying the bill.   They care about protecting the perps for some reason.   Why?   To destabilize society to the point where we beg them to take over and become authoritarian.   They call good bad, bad good, light darkness and darkness light.   Everything is backwards from what it was even 30 years ago.   Looters are not bad.   Arsonists are not bad.   Shoplifters are not bad.   They are just exacting justice.   Well, Guliani figured it out and he was right.  NYC had low crime when he was mayor.   And the city was a lot more pleasant to  live in.   

mspart

 

[Offthemat]

36 minutes ago, mspart said:

The Ds currently reject that proposition.   Just look at blue cities and blue states.  There is no law enforcement.   There is no prosecution.   By no, I mean crime rates have gone up dramatically in the last 10 years and there  has not been a corresponding arrest rise or prosecution rise.   The Ds don't care about those paying the bill.   They care about protecting the perps for some reason.   Why?   To destabilize society to the point where we beg them to take over and become authoritarian.   They call good bad, bad good, light darkness and darkness light.   Everything is backwards from what it was even 30 years ago.   Looters are not bad.   Arsonists are not bad.   Shoplifters are not bad.   They are just exacting justice.   Well, Guliani figured it out and he was right.  NYC had low crime when he was mayor.   And the city was a lot more pleasant to  live in.   

mspart

 

You're right,  of course.  The Marxists are bad enough,  but I think it's more evil than that,  even.  So many are anti religion, anti family,  anarchist,  Sodom and Gomorrah,  devil worshipping evil.  Unable to be creative and productive,  they seek to destroy all that is beautiful, never finding satisfying accomplishment.  Only malevolence. 

[1032004]

21 hours ago, Caveira said:

Zionists.  We don’t need no stinkin zionists.    Wonder how this makes the largest population of Jews in the USA feel  
 

let them riot marmaduke

 

Leftists aren’t violent for no reason 

 

 

They weren’t protesting a synagogue, the synagogue was hosting an event selling illegal real estate in the West Bank. You fell for fake news yet again.  Do better.

https://forward.com/news/823165/park-east-synagogue-manhattan-protest-west-bank-real-estate/

[Caveira]

9 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

They weren’t protesting a synagogue, the synagogue was hosting an event selling illegal real estate in the West Bank. You fell for fake news yet again.  Do better.

https://forward.com/news/823165/park-east-synagogue-manhattan-protest-west-bank-real-estate/

Indeed i fell for nothing.   What’s the we don’t need no zionists here nonsense … and criminal violence 

Edited May 7 by Caveira

[mspart]

So that makes assaulting police officers and breaking through a barricade acceptable?  

This is not a peaceful protest.   Nobody would be concerned about a peaceful protest.   But this was not that.  People in general, except leftists, are not generally in favor of violence.   But just to be clear,  the violence is ok because they were protesting illegal real estate sales in the west bank?   What?

mspart

[Caveira]

30 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Leftists aren’t violent for no reason 

True.   They’re violent when they don’t get their way.   

[1032004]

22 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Indeed i fell for nothing.   What’s the we don’t need no zionists here nonsense … and criminal violence 

Anti-Zionism is not antisemitism

22 minutes ago, mspart said:

So that makes assaulting police officers and breaking through a barricade acceptable?  

This is not a peaceful protest.   Nobody would be concerned about a peaceful protest.   But this was not that.  People in general, except leftists, are not generally in favor of violence.   But just to be clear,  the violence is ok because they were protesting illegal real estate sales in the west bank?   What?

mspart

No violence is not OK if there was any.  Just saying it wasn’t antisemitic.

[1032004]

1 minute ago, Caveira said:

True.   They’re violent when they don’t get their way.   

Why are you making up fake quotes weirdo?

[Caveira]

3 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Anti-Zionism is not antisemitism

No violence is not OK if there was any.  Just saying it wasn’t antisemitic.

What were they yelling   in their protest ?   Why do you condone criminal violence and rioting 

Edited May 7 by Caveira

[1032004]

Just now, Caveira said:

What were they yelling   in their protest ?

I couldn’t get it to play, what were they saying?  if you’re referring to “we don’t want no Zionist here,” that is not antisemitic.

 

[Caveira]

15 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Anti-Zionism is not antisemitism

No violence is not OK if there was any.  Just saying it wasn’t antisemitic.

Right out of the article you posted:

slogans Zionist organizations view as antisemitic and a call for violence and removal of Jews in the region.

plus you can watch the video.   You just don’t want to 

Edited May 7 by Caveira

[Caveira]

16 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Why are you making up fake quotes weirdo?

Why are you defending criminal riots 

[1032004]

2 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Right out of the article you posted:

slogans Zionist organizations view as antisemitic and a call for violence and removal of Jews in the region.

plus you can watch the video.   You just don’t want to 

No I deleted Twitter, it wasn’t working.

Oh the Zionist organizations consider it antisemitic?  Lol that changes everything!

[Caveira]

4 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

No I deleted Twitter, it wasn’t working.

Oh the Zionist organizations consider it antisemitic?  Lol that changes everything!

The whole free free from the river to the sea chants are anti semetic 

the whole movement is anti semetic.  Palestine is anti semetic.  

you like to dodge the defending criminal riot questions 

[1032004]

7 minutes ago, Caveira said:

The whole free free from the river to the sea chants are anti semetic 

the whole movement is anti semetic.  Palestine is anti semetic.  

you like to dodge the defending criminal riot questions 

No it’s not, no it’s not, no it’s not.   Being against the government of Israel is not antisemitic.  Sure, some of the people are (I’d bet still less than the number of  right wing white supremacists), but “the movement” is not.   Look at the polling.   Old Republicans are pretty much the only group left that still strongly supports Israel

Edited May 7 by 1032004

[Caveira]

2 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

No it’s not, no it’s not, no it’s not.   Being against the government of Israel is not antisemitic.  Sure, some of the people are (I’d bet still less than the number of  right wing white supremacists), but “the movement” is not.   Look at the polling.   Old Republicans are pretty much the only group left that still strongly supports Israel

You don’t know what from the river to the sea…. Palestine will be free means?

[1032004]

1 minute ago, Caveira said:

You don’t know what from the river to the sea…. Palestine will be free means?

It doesn’t have anything to do with Jewish people that are outside the state of Israel

[braves121]

Fellas, is it antisemetic to not want people illegally occupying your land?