Enough Hyprocrisy

[mspart]

12 minutes ago, Lipdrag said:

If the former military and CIA members who made this ad think any illegal orders have been issued and obeyed they should not be releasing commercials about it.  They should be filing articles of impeachment and they should be referring all service members who committed crimes by obeying illegal orders to courts martial. 

If they do not have specific illegal orders for which impeachment and criminal charges for those obeying them then this is just crap.They did  not do that so this is just a stupid political stunt.  The fact that they got a stupid answer in return is not surprising.  This is just reindeer games at the national politics level.  Dems ratcheted it up and Trump responded with another ratchet.

Imagine if the President ran an ad reminding military members of their oath to defend (via killing and destroying) all enemies foreign and domestic and insinuated that these particular congressperps are the enemies.  No statement of crime.  No probable cause.  Just kept saying "all enemies foreign and domestic" while rolling their pictures one by one on the screen.  He's "just reminding them of their oath".  What could be wrong with the Commander in Chief reminding those he is chiefly commanding of their oath?  

 

Yes, this is taking that game to the next level.   Why he didn't say anything wrong.   But the insinuation is there and would be interpreted as such by all these people on the left who are right now saying they said nothing wrong, you must look at what they said and not what they really  meant.   

mspart

[Scouts Honor]

[Bigbrog]

19 hours ago, Scouts Honor said:

This!

[Scouts Honor]

nothing happened... but there are movies about what might have happened

 

[mspart]

Again, why bring this up now?   Why not last year, 2 years ago, 5 years ago, 10 years ago, etc?   This was calculated for the insinuation factor.   Only the left "can't see it".   

mspart

[Doublehalf]

7 minutes ago, mspart said:

Again, why bring this up now?   Why not last year, 2 years ago, 5 years ago, 10 years ago, etc?   This was calculated for the insinuation factor.   Only the left "can't see it".   

mspart

Wahh wahhh wahhh

[mspart]

Excellent answer.   You prove my point.   You know there have been no unlawful orders so you cannot explain why they did this.   So you resort to: 

mspart