Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, red viking said:

img_1_1758544994336.jpg

I'm pretty sure no matter how many times you post the same thing over and over it doesn't change the fact it doesn't mean what you think it means

  • Bob 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, uncle bernard said:

Can one of our conservatives defend Homan's actions - accepting a bribe on tape - or are you going to deflect?

Isn't Trump supposed to be draining the swamp? This looks pretty swampy.

@JimmySpeaks @Bigbrog @Scouts Honor @Caveira

One thing I have always been consistent on is that if someone, no matter what letter they have after their name, broke the law in any way they should be held accountable.  This holds true for Homan, if the allegations are found to be true.  And honestly, I don't know too much about his specific case.

  • Bob 1
Posted
55 minutes ago, uncle bernard said:

Can one of our conservatives defend Homan's actions - accepting a bribe on tape - or are you going to deflect?

Isn't Trump supposed to be draining the swamp? This looks pretty swampy.

@JimmySpeaks @Bigbrog @Scouts Honor @Caveira

I think asking these two to do that might crater their collective brain power for the next few days, maybe the week. 

Posted (edited)

The problem with politicians is both parties are full of crooks.  And both parties ignore their crooks and yammer on about the other sides crooks.   Then they rinse repeats this process every n years when the parties come in and out of power.   That goes for the fans of the parties like you see on this board.  
 

I forgot who said it.  And tbh it doesn’t matter but one argument on this board was trying to measure how bad person As comment was vs Bs comment.   This is a function of what I described above as if you can articulate my bad comment was slightly less bad than your bad comment then you can start to look the other way regarding your party and continue to yammer on about how bad the other party is.  

term limits please.    More term limits.  Congress is trash.  Local government is more corrupt and worse somehow.  

Edited by Caveira
  • Bob 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, wrestlingguy said:

This may be a dumb question. What kind of contracts would an FBI agent be looking for? 

They were undercover as business men. Homan was offering insider connections for contracts in exchange for cash (allegedly). Standard corruption.

It's exactly the kind of operation that Trump implicitly ran on when he promised to clean out the swamp. Unfortunately, his administration seems to throw the fish back if it has an R next to it.

 

 

Posted
21 minutes ago, uncle bernard said:

They were undercover as business men. Homan was offering insider connections for contracts in exchange for cash (allegedly). Standard corruption.

It's exactly the kind of operation that Trump implicitly ran on when he promised to clean out the swamp. Unfortunately, his administration seems to throw the fish back if it has an R next to it.

 

 

Oh I see. So Homan didn't know they were undercover.

Posted

According to Andy McCarthy, a fellow who knows a little about law, you can’t be bribed unless you hold a position of power, and you can’t conspire with an undercover agent. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...