Crockett Destroys Patel

[1032004]

2 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Most teachers and /or professors don’t have a lot of followers yet they’re major influencers.  Quite a few stories out there right now. 

Yes. “Quite a few.”  Out of about 4 million

[Caveira]

4 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Not even that lady what?  Is she famous?

No but tis way to easier to find liberals celebrating this.   This = Kirk’s death.   Honestly it is far far easier than finding liberals crying about that hot jeans blond lady  

 

it’s more information overload vs the hot lady.   

Edited 2 hours ago by Caveira

[JimmySpeaks]

2 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Yes. “Quite a few.”  Out of about 4 million

So # of followers always matters? Got it.  

Edited 2 hours ago by JimmySpeaks

[wrestlingguy]

16 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

Honor system, without going back. 
If you actually read the post, can you roughly breakdown my explanation? 
 

Then tell me why I would wrong with that approach? 

In short, you were explaining why dumbing down is a good approach in your opinion, and threw in an example about using it when coaching. 4 paragraphs seemed excessive to get to the point. This isn't college where you have to try to add filler to get to your 10 page essay goal.  

[1032004]

10 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Honestly it is far far easier than finding liberals crying about that hot jeans blond lady 

Yes I acknowledged this previously.

[1032004]

11 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

So # of followers always matters? Got it.  

No, but like I said you can find a few hundred people saying just about anything.  But if someone with a lot of followers says something there’s a good chance a lot more people than just them are saying it

[Caveira]

8 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

No, but like I said you can find a few hundred people saying just about anything.  But if someone with a lot of followers says something there’s a good chance a lot more people than just them are saying it

This guy have any followers ?

How. Do you condone cnn letting this guy on air?

 

hint.   It’s the same scum bag.  That calls for the death of conservatives.  The start of genocide against conservatives.  CNN let him on air.  He also calls Charlie Satan or whatever he called him.  He has a million followers and cnn is letting him advertise his hate.   Great job cnn 

Edited 1 hour ago by Caveira

[1032004]

3 minutes ago, Caveira said:

This guy have any followers ?

How. Do you condone cnn letting this guy on air?

 

Same guy you already talked about lol, thanks for confirming there aren’t many.

[Caveira]

1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

Same guy you already talked about lol, thanks for confirming there aren’t many.

Why is cnn letting him have a platform for his hate speech?

[1032004]

1 minute ago, Caveira said:

Why is cnn letting him have a platform for his hate speech?

Charlie Kirk:  “speech is not violence.  Violence is violence.”

[Caveira]

 

surely cnn had background checkers and know the type of hate he speaks. 
 

you think there is nothing wrong with giving that guy a platform?
 

A civil lawsuit from Kirk’s family against cnn would be interesting.   

9 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Charlie Kirk:  “speech is not violence.  Violence is violence.”

Edited 1 hour ago by Caveira

[JimmySpeaks]

22 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

No, but like I said you can find a few hundred people saying just about anything.  But if someone with a lot of followers says something there’s a good chance a lot more people than just them are saying it

Again. Not if they’re professors and teachers.  Btw do you follow jojo and Brooklyn dad?  

Edited 1 hour ago by JimmySpeaks

[1032004]

2 minutes ago, Caveira said:

 

surely cnn had background checkers and know the type of hate he speaks. 
 

you think there is nothing wrong with giving that guy a platform?
 

A civil lawsuit from Kirk’s family against cnn would be interesting.   

Charlie Kirk would want him to have a platform.

[Caveira]

Just now, 1032004 said:

Charlie Kirk would want him to have a platform.

Would Chuck Schumer?

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8SuRWJC/
 

[Scouts Honor]

40 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

No, but like I said you can find a few hundred people saying just about anything.  But if someone with a lot of followers says something there’s a good chance a lot more people than just them are saying it

so kimmel doesn't really count. agreed.

his show was failing

[1032004]

19 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

.  Btw do you follow jojo and Brooklyn dad?  

Heard of them but haven’t seen what they said about Kirk’s death.  What did they say about it? 

[ThreePointTakedown]

57 minutes ago, wrestlingguy said:

In short, you were explaining why dumbing down is a good approach in your opinion, and threw in an example about using it when coaching. 4 paragraphs seemed excessive to get to the point. This isn't college where you have to try to add filler to get to your 10 page essay goal.  

If you would like me to assume you know what's in my head, then it would save me time typing. But I don't think that would help anyone else that could be reading. I'm sorry that I make you read so much. 

 

But you also didn't answer as to why is a wrong approach. Do you suggest that only speak to people I feel can hang with me and my experience on a topic? That must be what it is. But then you'll be upset that I am trying to seem intellectually superior by not included those I feel could not follow along. 

I have a feeling you know the answer(s) is/are 'yes' but won't admit it, but do you realize you're getting upset and fomenting anger towards a person, firstly, that others will/might see and potentially spur them to violence and secondly, is such a minor topic in the world that you just want something to be upset about? 

 

I know you won't read this so I'm comfortable in ranting here. But this is one of the major differences in the two parties. The left has legitimate concerns with the direction the right is trying to take the country. Which is towards authoritarianism and christian nationalism. Putting at risk the lives of countless people, including many on the right, that would not survive the purge that would need to happen for it to take place. And that IS what will need to happen. Because that's what happens every time. They get rid of the professors that study government and history so that they can rewrite it. Purge the artists and the intellectuals because they have the rhetorical skills to protest effectively and inspire the masses to stand against a dictator. Then it gets trickier. Everything that isn't immediate compliance is an act of rebellion and no one can be allowed to get away with it. Because one match can start a fire. 

 

I know, if you're reading this at all, you're saying to yourself, 'no it could never happen here, I wouldn't let it'. But if all you care about are you and your small circle of family and friends. Then suddenly one of them was put in the cross hairs of that regime simply by accident and given no due process to prove their case and deported or executed. How safe would you feel knowing, now, that currently the party that would most likely do something like this(and we all know its the Republicans, because everything is allowed with god on your side) is one you support. 

 

You'll probably blather about how much I type and how long it takes for you to read. That's just want someone that should be talked down to would say. So it doesn't bother me. Because I have thought of these things and if you've read this far, you have too even though you probably tried really hard not to. For fear of having to come to terms with the hate and anger that the leaders of your party have for the Constitution and at least 50% of the people in this country. 

Edited 1 hour ago by ThreePointTakedown
Left

[jross]

2 hours ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

 

People on this thread site have mocked me for using big words. 

People get offended when they feel they are being spoken down to. Yes I see the irony in speaking down to you in an attempt to educate you about speaking down to people. 

When perceiving to be spoken down to an emotional response can happen and you may no longer be listening for the purpose of understanding, but waiting for you chance to interject the nature of your perceived offense. 

So it can be beneficial in certain circumstances to dumb things down. For example, visiting a doctor. There is a tiny chance someone could understand what doctor is saying if things are not dumbed down at least a bit. 

If you're not as upset with doctors dumbing things down, which is way more impactful on your life, than a politician you should ask yourself why you care? 

Is it just a way for you to flex your rage at a political party, an opinion, or a person from a particular group? 
 

To answer your question, no they are not ‘too’ dumb. That’s how she feels is a productive way to communicate. Sorry that makes you mad. 
have asked yourself why you’re so mad?

We may disengage due to redundant loquacity.

[Paul158]

4 hours ago, red viking said:

Wow. Great job of summarizing his endless corruption, failures and towing (as @JimmySpeaksspells it) the line. Left him speechless, probably crying, so Jim Jordan tried to come to his rescue. Lmfao. 

 

Reflect Politics has like 4 followers. She laid out a bunch of her opinions. She is quite the show boater. It's all about her.

[wrestlingguy]

8 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

If you would like me to assume you know what's in my head, then it would save me time typing. But I don't think that would help anyone else that could be reading. I'm sorry that I make you read so much. 

 

But you also didn't answer as to why is a wrong approach. Do you suggest that only speak to people I feel can hang with me and my experience on a topic? That must be what it is. But then you'll be upset that I am trying to seem intellectually superior by not included those I feel could not follow along. 

I have a feeling you know the answer(s) is/are 'yes' but won't admit it, but do you realize you're getting upset and fomenting anger towards a person, firstly, that others will/might see and potentially spur them to violence and secondly, is such a minor topic in the world that you just want something to be upset about? Huh?

 

I know you won't read this so I'm comfortable in ranting here. But this is one of the major differences in the two parties. The left has legitimate concerns with the direction the right is trying to take the country. Which is towards authoritarianism and christian nationalism. Putting at risk the lives of countless people, including many on the right, that would not survive the purge that would need to happen for it to take place. And that IS what will need to happen. Because that's what happens every time. They get rid of the professors that study government and history so that they can rewrite it. Purge the artists and the intellectuals because they have the rhetorical skills to protest effectively and inspire the masses to stand against a dictator. Then it gets trickier. Everything that isn't immediate compliance is an act of rebellion and no one can be allowed to get away with it. Because one match can start a fire. In what world?

 

I know, if you're reading this at all, you're saying to yourself, 'no it could never happen here, I wouldn't let it'. But if all you care about are you and your small circle of family and friends. Then suddenly one of them was put in the cross hairs of that regime simply by accident and given no due process to prove their case and deported or executed. How safe would you feel knowing, now, that currently the party that would most likely do something like this(and we all know its the Republicans, because everything is allowed with god on your side) is one you support. Touch some grass and stop consuming media immediately. You are 100% feeding into the lies. The left just killed someone, not the other way around.

 

You'll probably blather about how much I type and how long it takes for you to read. That's just want someone that should be talked down to would say. So it doesn't bother me. Because I have thought of these things and if you've read this far, you have too even though you probably tried really hard not to. For fear of having to come to terms with the hate and anger that the leaders of your party have for the Constitution and at least 50% of the people in this country. 

I am guessing based on your grammar, English isn't your first language or your AI didn't pass the grammar check. 

[Caveira]

24 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

If you would like me to assume you know what's in my head, then it would save me time typing. But I don't think that would help anyone else that could be reading. I'm sorry that I make you read so much. 

 

But you also didn't answer as to why is a wrong approach. Do you suggest that only speak to people I feel can hang with me and my experience on a topic? That must be what it is. But then you'll be upset that I am trying to seem intellectually superior by not included those I feel could not follow along. 

I have a feeling you know the answer(s) is/are 'yes' but won't admit it, but do you realize you're getting upset and fomenting anger towards a person, firstly, that others will/might see and potentially spur them to violence and secondly, is such a minor topic in the world that you just want something to be upset about? 

 

I know you won't read this so I'm comfortable in ranting here. But this is one of the major differences in the two parties. The left has legitimate concerns with the direction the right is trying to take the country. Which is towards authoritarianism and christian nationalism. Putting at risk the lives of countless people, including many on the right, that would not survive the purge that would need to happen for it to take place. And that IS what will need to happen. Because that's what happens every time. They get rid of the professors that study government and history so that they can rewrite it. Purge the artists and the intellectuals because they have the rhetorical skills to protest effectively and inspire the masses to stand against a dictator. Then it gets trickier. Everything that isn't immediate compliance is an act of rebellion and no one can be allowed to get away with it. Because one match can start a fire. 

 

I know, if you're reading this at all, you're saying to yourself, 'no it could never happen here, I wouldn't let it'. But if all you care about are you and your small circle of family and friends. Then suddenly one of them was put in the cross hairs of that regime simply by accident and given no due process to prove their case and deported or executed. How safe would you feel knowing, now, that currently the party that would most likely do something like this(and we all know its the Republicans, because everything is allowed with god on your side) is one you support. 

 

You'll probably blather about how much I type and how long it takes for you to read. That's just want someone that should be talked down to would say. So it doesn't bother me. Because I have thought of these things and if you've read this far, you have too even though you probably tried really hard not to. For fear of having to come to terms with the hate and anger that the leaders of your party have for the Constitution and at least 50% of the people in this country. 

By all means expect me to divine your interior monologue—such presumptuous omniscience would be an exquisite timesaver—yet that’s not pedagogy, it’s pretension; your grandiloquent, sesquipedalian flourishes and performative vitriol may procure applause, but they neither absolve you of moral accountability nor inoculate anyone from the real-world consequences of fomenting dehumanization.

[Paul158]

1 hour ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

Honor system, without going back. 
If you actually read the post, can you roughly breakdown my explanation? 
 

Then tell me why I would wrong with that approach? 

Last sentence. Why I was wrong. Just helping.