What about Mamdani?

[Undefeated]

2 hours ago, Offthemat said:

I’m not going all eclectic on this, but socialism is just communism lite.  But the major thinker missed one small detail in his plan.  Human nature.  Socialism goes against the grain of human nature so much that it can’t hold up on its own.  It either has to convert to capitalism or move on to full communist dictatorship.  And I don’t see much difference between the ayatollah and chairman Xi.  
 

Palestinians haven’t done anything to support in over a century, other than attack and kill Jews.  I don’t fall for mandami’s mealy mouthing about intifada.  We all know what it refers to.  Globalize it means they intend to continue until everyone is a Muslim, one way or another.  Then they can go about killing each other.  
 

This country was founded on Judeo-Christian principles so politics and religion are interwoven.  I go by the way the women dress.  If their women are dressed in garb that hides the fact that they’re women, then they’re one of the bad ones.  If you have to treat women as inferiors to be content with your life, then you’re the one with problems.  

Ok.

[jross]

Strike 1 

 

[JimmySpeaks]

2 hours ago, 1032004 said:

He specifically said he doesn’t use that phrase.  He was asked what he thought the definition was and provided an interpretation

And refuses to denounce it 

[JimmySpeaks]

3 hours ago, Offthemat said:

I’m not going all eclectic on this, but socialism is just communism lite.  But the major thinker missed one small detail in his plan.  Human nature.  Socialism goes against the grain of human nature so much that it can’t hold up on its own.  It either has to convert to capitalism or move on to full communist dictatorship.  And I don’t see much difference between the ayatollah and chairman Xi.  
 

Palestinians haven’t done anything to support in over a century, other than attack and kill Jews.  I don’t fall for mandami’s mealy mouthing about intifada.  We all know what it refers to.  Globalize it means they intend to continue until everyone is a Muslim, one way or another.  Then they can go about killing each other.  
 

This country was founded on Judeo-Christian principles so politics and religion are interwoven.  I go by the way the women dress.  If their women are dressed in garb that hides the fact that they’re women, then they’re one of the bad ones.  If you have to treat women as inferiors to be content with your life, then you’re the one with problems.  

This  

[1032004]

45 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

And refuses to denounce it 

What do you think the phrase means?

[jross]

15 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Kirk’s post you speak of simply expresses two facts.  And expressing facts isn’t always comfortable for everyone.   Fact 1) 24 years ago Muslims attacked NYC (and killed 3,000 innocent people). Fact 2) a Muslim with socialist policy agenda is now a leading candidate for major of NYC.  His post want just about him being Muslim, it is mainly about the agenda he is pushing. They are simply facts.  It’s up to you to be comfortable with that or not.  But, as I said to uncle b, if you’re going to die on the hill that expressing facts that are uncomfortable for some is a bigger issue than blatantly calling for the murder of law enforcement, over number of followers, then you seriously should take some self inventory.  

To offend a strong man, tell him a lie. To offend a weak man, tell him the truth.

[1032004]

7 minutes ago, jross said:

To offend a strong man, tell him a lie. To offend a weak man, tell him the truth.

OK I’ll chalk you up as having no problem with Kirk equating Mamdani with 9/11 too.  

 

[WrestlingRasta]

10 minutes ago, jross said:

To offend a strong man, tell him a lie. To offend a weak man, tell him the truth.

And there is a big issue in today's world with people wanting to be offended, needing to be offended, not settling for anything less than having something for which to be offended.  

[1032004]

4 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

And there is a big issue in today's world with people wanting to be offended, needing to be offended, not settling for anything less than having something for which to be offended.  

Agreed, like seeking out comments from city council longshots that very few people would have seen if not amplified by the conservative media 

Edited July 11 by 1032004

[JimmySpeaks]

23 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

What do you think the phrase means?

Why won’t he denounce it? 

[JimmySpeaks]

8 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Agreed, like seeking out comments from city council longshots that very few people would have seen if not amplified by the conservative media 

So you finally admit that a lot of people have seen it. Not just his 500 followers. Nice. 

[uncle bernard]

2 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Why won’t he denounce it? 

He believes in free speech. 

[JimmySpeaks]

2 minutes ago, uncle bernard said:

He believes in free speech. 

Ya. Sure he does.  

[1032004]

6 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

So you finally admit that a lot of people have seen it. Not just his 500 followers. Nice. 

Huh?  I never said otherwise 

[1032004]

8 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Why won’t he denounce it? 

Because in addition to freedom of speech, he thinks it is usually said in reference to Palestinian rights.   He is against Israel, he is not against Jews as a whole.  And his point is 100% correct that he understands the attacks Jewish people have faced, because he faced similar ones (probably worse) as a result of the Islamaphobia immediately following 9/11.  And now Charlie Kirk and his ilk are trying to Make Islamaphobia Great Again

[JimmySpeaks]

5 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Huh?  I never said otherwise 

Sure ya did.  you’ve said many times on here that what he said was no big deal because he has no following as a candidate for a meaningless city position. 

Edited July 11 by JimmySpeaks

[1032004]

1 minute ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Sure ya did.  you’ve said many times on here that what he said was no big deal because he has no following as a candidate for a meaningless city position. 

Liar

[Caveira]

2 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

probably worse

Stretching a bit here?

[JimmySpeaks]

8 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Because in addition to freedom of speech, he thinks it is usually said in reference to Palestinian rights.   He is against Israel, he is not against Jews as a whole.  And his point is 100% correct that he understands the attacks Jewish people have faced, because he faced similar ones (probably worse) as a result of the Islamaphobia immediately following 9/11.  And now Charlie Kirk and his ilk are trying to Make Islamaphobia Great Again

He wants to isolate Israel. Cut them off.  Run NYC under international law where no one can do any business with Israel Gee that won’t negatively impact the Jewish people at all.  Libtardos have been making anti semitism great again for sometime now. 

Edited July 11 by JimmySpeaks

[JimmySpeaks]

3 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Liar

Yep that’s what you are. A liar. 

[1032004]

1 minute ago, JimmySpeaks said:

He wants to isolate Israel. Cut them off.  Run NYC under international law where no one can do any business with Isabel.  Gee that won’t negatively impact the Jewish people at all.  Libtardos have been making anti semitism great again for sometime now. 

You think the mayor of NYC can do all that?

[JimmySpeaks]

Just now, 1032004 said:

You think the mayor of NYC can do all that?

It what he says he wants to do. 

[1032004]

4 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Stretching a bit here?

You don’t think the overall hate against Muslims following 9/11 was worse than the overall hate against Jews in the last 25 years?

[JimmySpeaks]

4 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

You don’t think the overall hate against Muslims following 9/11 was worse than the overall hate against Jews in the last 25 years?

I think there are countries on this planet that want the Jewish people eradicated 

[1032004]

1 minute ago, JimmySpeaks said:

I think there are countries on this planet that want the Jewish people eradicated 

The whole country?