Jump to content

US just dropped Bombs on 3 nuclear sites. Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan.


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

i forgot biden gave them billions

 

Noice.  That’s the tik tok I plopped in one of these chats earlier.   I love side by side videos for these corrupt politicians.  

  • Bob 1
Posted
3 hours ago, scourge165 said:

Some of you really need to figure out what point you're trying to argue. 

Some need to work on their comprehension skills. 

  • Fire 1
  • Clown 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

Some need to work on their comprehension skills. 

I agree. SOME need to work on both.

 

The people arguing the Country that's so close to Nuclear Weapons that it's imperative we bomb them while also arguing...they need a prolonged period for a cease fire because they have "iPhone in caves," are definitely struggling with both reading comprehension and deductive reasoning. 

Posted
5 hours ago, Scouts Honor said:

so we sanctioned them for years... but keeping their money is a bridge too far.

doesn't matter whose it was... sanction them or don't. 

Because we made a binding agreement to give it back. 

  • Bob 1
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Tripnsweep said:

Because we made a binding agreement to give it back. 

Whatever happened to not negotiating with terrorists.   I thought we were supposed to have binding info about what they spent it on?   Did they hold up that end of the bargain?

 

here is a good video to review 

 

 

Edited by Caveira
Posted
13 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Is 6-12 hours prolonged.   It’s a pretty simple question. 

Yeah...that is is a simple question. When you change a word and ask of out nowhere "6-12 hours in prolonged," I didn't know what you were asking.

 

But yes, by definition...it is prolonged. Do you know what "prolonged" means?

Quote

Prolonged; continued or extended in duration

 

So I said...with no political bend to it, that I find it odd we're saying we're going to have set a cease-fire so you can launch off another attack...and then Trump said the same thing. So again...what are you even arguing? The definition of words?

 

AGAIN...some of you really need to figure out what the hell you're even arguing. You also just asked if I thought we should allow Iran a Nuclear Weapon...and you're asking ME about MY reading comprehension?

 

Posted
1 minute ago, scourge165 said:

Yeah...that is is a simple question. When you change a word and ask of out nowhere "6-12 hours in prolonged," I didn't know what you were asking.

 

But yes, by definition...it is prolonged. Do you know what "prolonged" means?

 

So I said...with no political bend to it, that I find it odd we're saying we're going to have set a cease-fire so you can launch off another attack...and then Trump said the same thing. So again...what are you even arguing? The definition of words?

 

AGAIN...some of you really need to figure out what the hell you're even arguing. You also just asked if I thought we should allow Iran a Nuclear Weapon...and you're asking ME about MY reading comprehension?

 

6-12 hours isn’t prolonged boss.   

  • Fire 1
  • Clown 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Caveira said:

6-12 hours isn’t prolonged boss.   

Instead of just clown emoji everything make an argument.  Is 6-12 hours to prolonged for you?   Also why on earth do you care ?

  • Fire 1
  • Clown 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Caveira said:

Instead of just clown emoji everything make an argument.  Is 6-12 hours to prolonged for you?   Also why on earth do you care ?

Why do I care?

THIS is the extent of what I said about it;

Quote

Yeah, it's always been done where the cease fire starts at a certain time... but I said it didn't make sense to sign it with the intent of trying to launch a massive attack just prior to the treaty going into effect. You gave two scenarios, there was one where someone continued an offensive with knowledge they'd agreed to a peace treaty. 

 

And gee...lets think. Why would I possibly care about a cease-fire as opposed to escalating the conflict? 

 

Man...you got me. Just...silly, huh?

Posted
2 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

Wonderful. 

Do you have any point or are you just going to keep asking stupid questions like "do you think Iran should have Nuclear weapons?"

 

As for the asinine and pedantic, argue with Trump;

 

https://x.com/i/status/1937486228229697823

 

Is your desire for them to have or have not Nukes not a valid question?

  • Clown 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Is your desire for them to have or have not Nukes not a valid question?

Read the thread. Read the last 2-3 pages. 

I've been SO abundantly clear on this, it's not a "valid question," it's a stupid game you're trying to play. You'd have to be Scout/Jimmy-level stupid to not understand at this point. 

Posted (edited)
On 6/23/2025 at 10:39 PM, GreatWhiteNorth said:

It might be a good thing if it wasn't just another Trump lie.

This time Trump is desperately trying to spin the fact that he just stepped into giant pile of poo. He was manipulated like a child by real world leaders.

Not a peep from either Israel or Iran. They aren't playing along.

 

On 6/23/2025 at 10:51 PM, JimmySpeaks said:

They have no choice but to “play along” 

 

On 6/23/2025 at 10:57 PM, JimmySpeaks said:

Ya. Let’s see what happens if they don’t 

 

On 6/23/2025 at 11:00 PM, GreatWhiteNorth said:

True. Can't argue with that. We shall see soon enough.

Hope it's not another forever war in the making - that'd be bad all the way around.

And the facts are now in...

'They have no choice but to "play along"' - says JimmySpanks... and he's... WRONG [BUZZ]

'Ya. Let's see what happens if they don't" - says JimmySpanks... and it's... NOTHING [BUZZ]

As expected by all, JimmySpanks is nothing more than a big fat mouth with a tiny brain.

We have just witnessed the birth of another extremely expensive Forever War thanks to our orange disgrace of a leader.

If Musk were to come back to fire more people, he'd have to fire many hundreds of thousands to pay for the bombing fiasco that barely scratched the surface of Iran's mountains.

(If only the tiny brains around here could grasp the concept that this is actually a giant problem for all of us. Take your MAGA hat off long enough to use your head for more than holding up that hat. Trump has the country in a downward trajectory. And nothing is on the horizon that looks to turn that around.)

Get ready for much higher gas prices, higher inflation, and our economy to run wildly off track.

Edited by GreatWhiteNorth
Posted

Headline:  Trump Cures Breast Cancer

RV and the like:  Total FAIL by Trump!!  He didn't even cure the most common kind of cancer!  Most of breast cancer patients have positive outcomes anyway...he is such an overweight orange failure!!  (screams into pillow in his/her/their mom's basement)

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, GreatWhiteNorth said:

 

 

 

And the facts are now in...

'They have no choice but to "play along"' - says JimmySpanks... and he's... WRONG [BUZZ]

'Ya. Let's see what happens if they don't" - says JimmySpanks... and it's... NOTHING [BUZZ]

As expected by all, JimmySpanks is nothing more than a big fat mouth with a tiny brain.

We have just witnessed the birth of another extremely expensive Forever War thanks to our orange disgrace of a leader.

If Musk were to come back to fire more people, he'd have to fire many hundreds of thousands to pay for the bombing fiasco that barely scratched the surface of Iran's mountains.

(If only the tiny brains around here could grasp the concept that this is actually a giant problem for all of us. Take your MAGA hat off long enough to use your head for more than holding up that hat. Trump has the country in a downward trajectory. And nothing is on the horizon that looks to turn that around.)

Get ready for much higher gas prices, higher inflation, and our economy to run wildly off track.

Hey Snow Plow guy from Minnesota, You literally agreed with me.  

Edited by JimmySpeaks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Rankings

  • College Commitments

    Morgan Layman

    Skyline, Virginia
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Frostburg State (Women)
    Projected Weight: 117, 124

    Naria Medrano

    Alexandria City, Virginia
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Frostburg State (Women)
    Projected Weight: 160, 180

    Belle Konopka

    Seneca, New Jersey
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Frostburg State (Women)
    Projected Weight: 131

    Chaniah Bernier

    Stephen Decatur, Maryland
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Frostburg State (Women)
    Projected Weight: 160, 180

    Anasette Cooper

    Swain County, North Carolina
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Frostburg State (Women)
    Projected Weight: 160, 180
×
×
  • Create New...