Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, red viking said:

So, if it's done, then why are the wingers still getting their panties in a bundle over this? 

Cause it’s still happening ?

Posted
Just now, Caveira said:

Cause it’s still happening ?

Well, if you live in California I suggest you write to your governor or the state athletic association expressing your anger over this grave injustice. If you have the spare time to make this a priority in your life 

Posted
17 minutes ago, red viking said:

So, if it's done, then why are the wingers still getting their panties in a bundle over this? 

b/c the lawless people just do what they want 

  • Clown 1
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Scouts Honor said:

b/c the lawless people just do what they want 

Then go complain to the California athletic association. This is a state issue. Funny that the wingers constantly whine about "state rights" but that only applies when the states want to do what they want. 

The hypocrisy of the right stinks to high heaven, over and over. 

Edited by red viking
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On 5/20/2025 at 12:08 PM, red viking said:

I actually agree that transexuals shouldn't be allowed to compete against females. I've acknowledged this many, many times. It happens so infrequently though that it doesn't even come close to deserving 1/100th of the attention that it is getting. I've been officiating five different sports for well over a decade now and I've NEVER seens a transexual trying to compete against girls. Yes, it happens, and that's unfortunate, but nothing that is impating 99.9% of people so it's sad that wingers constantly talk about this like it's a national emergency. 

Allowing an injustice to exist because it's small really isn't a good argument. 

  • Bob 1
  • Fire 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

Allowing an injustice to exist because it's small really isn't a good argument. 

Injustice? Are you sure? She is legally a woman, and I see no reason to think otherwise.

Tell me how you know this woman is somehow "not" a woman in your view. In your own view.

What do you know about the topic that you can add that I don't already know?

FOX News says she is trans - do you trust them because they are MSM?

Have you actually gotten your opinion from FOX/Fake News? That would be the most troubling part of all of this.

Posted
1 minute ago, GreatWhiteNorth said:

Injustice? Are you sure? She is legally a woman, and I see no reason to think otherwise.

Tell me how you know this woman is somehow "not" a woman in your view. In your own view.

What do you know about the topic that you can add that I don't already know?

FOX News says she is trans - do you trust them because they are MSM?

Have you actually gotten your opinion from FOX/Fake News? That would be the most troubling part of all of this.

Biology is a view? That's a new one. 

  • Bob 2
  • Clown 1
Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

Biology is a view? That's a new one. 

"Biology is a view?" Where did you come up with that one? Nobody said that here except you.

What about everything else that was posted in this thread - nothing to say about those thoughts?

Are you here to discuss or are you here to showcase that you are a buffoon with zero social skills.

With these latest sh** posts, nobody needs you any more than we need a sharp stick in the eye.

If you've got it in you, be better. Not a little better... a LOT better. At least try for fu**'s sake.

Edited by GreatWhiteNorth
  • Brain 1
Posted
On 5/20/2025 at 8:35 AM, red viking said:

What the hell is the CIF Southern Section Finals? 

LMAO. The wingers will look under every nook and cranny to find a tranny competing in a girls or woman's sport. 

So what?

 

They should be able to look under EVERY-SINGLE-ROCK there is...in competitive sports in JHS, High School, College, at the Sr Level, at the Olympic Level and they should be ABLE to turn over EVERY-SINGLE-ROCK and not find a single example of it. 


If you're trans...ok. That's not my business. If you're trans and you need to compete against biological females(as a biological male or a trans women)... then explain to me the debate there?

 

-You can debate at what age you allow puberty blockers. If you're a mother and you have 3 trans children(all boys who are trans-women) you're LIKELY behind it.

A child coming home and saying, "I want to play with dolls," is not a sign they are actually girl. 


 

 

My god...WHY is this an issue ANYONE on the left fights? SOOOO few people believe this is fair, they're just afraid of losing the LGBT crowd. I don't want to lose the LGB crowd. I think they deserve rights and protections. I think the "T" crowd, if they want to ACT like they're crazy and compete against girls, we don't need to placate them. 

 

 

*****And YES, the right absolutely gets off on this type of stuff, Riley Gaines has turned into a sad grifter...but that doesn't make the lareger point wrong. 


Stop pretending like "assigned male at birth" because a child was born with a penis and balls is merely a CLUE as to who they are. That is a boy. That will become a man(unless Megan Fox gets ahold of that child) and when they are in HS or College, they should NOT compete against those "assigned female at birth" children. 

 

 

 

THIS IS A FVVCKING LAYUP!!! How are we blowing this one!

 

Sorry theydies and shentlemen, you cannot compete in HS athletics OR...you can, but you must compete against the boys. It's SOOO simple. 

Posted
On 5/20/2025 at 12:08 PM, red viking said:

I actually agree that transexuals shouldn't be allowed to compete against females. I've acknowledged this many, many times. It happens so infrequently though that it doesn't even come close to deserving 1/100th of the attention that it is getting. I've been officiating five different sports for well over a decade now and I've NEVER seens a transexual trying to compete against girls. Yes, it happens, and that's unfortunate, but nothing that is impating 99.9% of people so it's sad that wingers constantly talk about this like it's a national emergency. 

Ok. 

Then just start there and then the thread pretty much ENDS there. 


There's no need to argue when we agree. And you may have been involved in a LOT of athletics, but THIS is a MAJOR sports event. I'm a little surprised you'd make a joke and ask what even is this?

Winning a State Title in California is a HUGE accomplishment. 

On 5/20/2025 at 12:15 PM, red viking said:

...California can go ahead and sign a bill then. Do you live there? I don't, so I'm going not going to try to tell them what to do. 

I have a niece that swims in California. I'll ask her this upcoming weekend when I see her how many transexual boys she's competing against. I bet the answer is somewhere between zero and none. 

 

I have abused zero children in my life and I don't actually know anyone who has abused children.

I do remember hearing this story about how my Aunt by Marriage had a great-great Uncle who suddenly changed parishes under questionable circumstances, but we don't know.

 

MY BROTHER IN CHRIST....and ANECDOTE doesn't change ANYTHING!!! You've had power lifters who are trans compete in the Olympics! 

You just saw one of the largest track events in California. Who cares if your Niece actually knows about it?

You just said you don't believe it should be allowed. That's a COMMON SENSE opinion. So...maybe just...go with that. It's pretty basic. 

 

Doesn't matter if it's 1 out of 2500...though it's more. 

You had a women win an NCAA NATINAL CHAMPION. Except...it wasn't a women, it was a MALE who transitioned to Female. That was 2019. That's not "under a rock."

  •  

    Quote

     

    • Nearly 900 medals won globally by transgender athletes in women’s sports, per a UN report.

    • At the elite level, a few prominent examples: Olympic gold (Quinn), NCAA champion (Telfer), world cycling champion (Ivy), and international weightlifting medals (Hubbard).

     

     

  •  

Posted
53 minutes ago, GreatWhiteNorth said:

Injustice? Are you sure? She is legally a woman, and I see no reason to think otherwise.

Tell me how you know this woman is somehow "not" a woman in your view. In your own view.

What do you know about the topic that you can add that I don't already know?

FOX News says she is trans - do you trust them because they are MSM?

Have you actually gotten your opinion from FOX/Fake News? That would be the most troubling part of all of this.


Ok, well...if in this particular case, the person in question is a biological women, then they deserved to win.

 

My issue is the reflexive nature to fight on this issue.

We are quick to judge and I'm guilty of it in this case.... but it was more @red viking who I think is a smart person...or @El Luchadorwho thinks in the same linear manner. Everyone bad is on the left, everyone good is on the right.

 

We can be intellectually honest and maybe take a second. The Algerian Boxer was an example of someone who was immediately trashed unfairly. DSD is not trans...

 

But when we see something that's just...objectively wrong... we should call it out, even if we view it as a left wing or right wing issue.

Posted
1 hour ago, El Luchador said:

Biology is a view? That's a new one. 

Did you even read his view?

They're questioning the narrative that this is a biological male. 

Only YOU could read this;

1 hour ago, El Luchador said:

Injustice? Are you sure? She is legally a woman, and I see no reason to think otherwise.

Tell me how you know this woman is somehow "not" a woman in your view. In your own view.

What do you know about the topic that you can add that I don't already know?

FOX News says she is trans - do you trust them because they are MSM?

SPECIFICALLY questions the veracity of FOX News reporting that she was trans, saying he's seen no evidence that she's not a women and you respond with err...'biology is a view? That's a new one.'

 

You play to the lowest common denominator EVERY SINGLE TIME. 

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, scourge165 said:

Ok. 

Then just start there and then the thread pretty much ENDS there. 


There's no need to argue when we agree. And you may have been involved in a LOT of athletics, but THIS is a MAJOR sports event. I'm a little surprised you'd make a joke and ask what even is this?

Winning a State Title in California is a HUGE accomplishment. 

 

I have abused zero children in my life and I don't actually know anyone who has abused children.

I do remember hearing this story about how my Aunt by Marriage had a great-great Uncle who suddenly changed parishes under questionable circumstances, but we don't know.

 

MY BROTHER IN CHRIST....and ANECDOTE doesn't change ANYTHING!!! You've had power lifters who are trans compete in the Olympics! 

You just saw one of the largest track events in California. Who cares if your Niece actually knows about it?

You just said you don't believe it should be allowed. That's a COMMON SENSE opinion. So...maybe just...go with that. It's pretty basic. 

 

Doesn't matter if it's 1 out of 2500...though it's more. 

You had a women win an NCAA NATINAL CHAMPION. Except...it wasn't a women, it was a MALE who transitioned to Female. That was 2019. That's not "under a rock."

  •  

     

  •  

The overall point here is that it is NOT a national priority. So many more important things for Trump to deal with. Sports are fun and entertainment. Let the state and national athletic associations govern themselves, including the NCAA. GOP can keep their controlling and grubby hands out of people's lives. California can govern their own high school sports, including track and field. 

Edited by red viking
Posted
5 minutes ago, red viking said:

The overall point here is that it is NOT a national priority. So many more important things for Trump to deal with. Sports are fun and entertainment. Let the state and national athletic associations govern themselves, including the NCAA. GOP can keep their controlling and grubby hands out of people's lives. California can govern their own high school sports, including track and field. 

Every topic doesn't have to be about Trump's legislative agenda.

You said you thought it was wrong. 

Why not agree...and end it there.

 

Now questioning the knee jerk reaction to see if she even is trans is fine. Didn't dawn on me....I looked but the picture was too far away. 

But, it appears legit and based on that, you're arguing just to argue. Kinda like Scout or Jimmy(not as obnoxiously). But you know this is wrong. Who cares how many "rocks" they looked under?

And CIF Sprinting is probably one of the best avenues to a women's Scholarship.

 

Doesn't matter where it should rank for Trump, not about Trump, it's about basic fairness and right and wrong. This...is wrong and there's something wrong with this person in the head. The need for attention or what, I don't know.

 

Lets just eliminate women's sports. They're pointless if we're doing this.

Posted
22 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

Every topic doesn't have to be about Trump's legislative agenda.

You said you thought it was wrong. 

Why not agree...and end it there.

 

Now questioning the knee jerk reaction to see if she even is trans is fine. Didn't dawn on me....I looked but the picture was too far away. 

But, it appears legit and based on that, you're arguing just to argue. Kinda like Scout or Jimmy(not as obnoxiously). But you know this is wrong. Who cares how many "rocks" they looked under?

And CIF Sprinting is probably one of the best avenues to a women's Scholarship.

 

Doesn't matter where it should rank for Trump, not about Trump, it's about basic fairness and right and wrong. This...is wrong and there's something wrong with this person in the head. The need for attention or what, I don't know.

 

Lets just eliminate women's sports. They're pointless if we're doing this.

National GOP can let the NCAA make their own decisions. And I certainly want them to keep their grubby hands out of my own state. For me, that supercedes the actual trans in sports issues. 

Posted (edited)

This reminds me of Trump ordering national guard to invade LA without governors consent. 

Total overreach. Stay in your own lane. 

Edited by red viking
Posted
3 hours ago, red viking said:

This reminds me of Trump ordering national guard to invade LA without governors consent. 

Total overreach. Stay in your own lane. 

So sometimes.  States rights good.  Sometimes bad?  
 

he’s enforcing federal law.   Maybe honey will arrest the mayor of la or that dip shyte governor.  

  • Bob 1
  • Clown 1
Posted
9 hours ago, GreatWhiteNorth said:

 

Tell me how you know this woman is somehow "not" a woman in your view. In your own view.

 

 

9 hours ago, GreatWhiteNorth said:

"Biology is a view?" Where did you come up with that one? Nobody said that here except you.

 

perhaps from the post you posted

  • Clown 1
Posted
9 hours ago, GreatWhiteNorth said:

 

What about everything else that was posted in this thread - nothing to say about those thoughts?

Are you here to discuss or are you here to showcase that you are a buffoon with zero social skills.

With these latest sh** posts, nobody needs you any more than we need a sharp stick in the eye.

 

wondering when you post this to yourself or the red lobster clan

Posted
5 hours ago, red viking said:

National GOP can let the NCAA make their own decisions. And I certainly want them to keep their grubby hands out of my own state. For me, that supercedes the actual trans in sports issues. 

we should let them decide to discriminate against women? 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...