Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

That's...just lazy lil Jimmy.
I get it. You thought you had a super clever comeback and it didn't really work out. 

Topic-How the Democrats handling of the Economy vs the Republicans
That's what everyone is posting about.
But you just blurted out Vietnam and Cambodia, never making any actual point...but it wasn't even about that!

 

LOL...sure bud. 

Scrooge and his ego think he’s the only one here that gets talked to.  

Posted (edited)

Jimmy...bud. I'm leaving you unread here. So I don't know what's taking you two posts here, or 5 in the other thread to respond to whatever you're talking about now, but...I doubt it's going to be all that enlightening that I'll regret it.

Edited by scourge165
Posted
7 hours ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Vietnam and Cambodia 

Just for all the slow folks.  This thread is about trumps tariffs.  I posted Vietnam and Cambodia so some of you might be interested in checking out how the Trump tariff discussions are going there.  
I’m TRULY sorry for the confusion.  😂

Posted
7 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

Jimmy...bud. I'm leaving you unread here. So I don't know what's taking you two posts here, or 5 in the other thread to respond to whatever you're talking about now, but...I doubt it's going to be all that enlightening that I'll regret it.

I’ve heard this once before.  Yet here you are.  Clueless 

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

Jimmy...bud. I'm leaving you unread here. So I don't know what's taking you two posts here, or 5 in the other thread to respond to whatever you're talking about now, but...I doubt it's going to be all that enlightening that I'll regret it.

Speaking of being a lil lazy……. I’m enjoying the back peddling though 

Edited by JimmySpeaks
Posted
20 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

you might be interested in checking out how the Trump tariff discussions are going there.  

Please be specific. I'm sure these are very educated discussions. Lmao. 

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Well there’s no dems in on them so probably. 

Oh dang. I look to random people from Cambodia as my main source of economics education, so I must really be missing out.

Edited by red viking
Posted
13 minutes ago, red viking said:

Oh dang. I look to random people from Cambodia as my main source of economics education, so I must really be missing out.

Is that what your career needs side gigs and a sugar mamma? 

Posted
54 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

The topic is Trumps Tariffs right?   Today I did some reading on what’s happening in Vietnam and Cambodia with tariff talks.  You should check it out.   WOW.  Sounds like those chairs really sucked to sleep in 

Between this and the morphine snipes I cannot believe you are making fun of his family member going into hospice.

You are despicable.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Between this and the morphine snipes I cannot believe you are making fun of his family member going into hospice.

You are despicable.

Nice reach but Thank you. 

Edited by JimmySpeaks
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Is that what your career needs side gigs and a sugar mamma? 

Don't need it but I enjoy it. Can't help it that smart women with law degrees dig me. Incomes aren't too far apart though when u add my side gigs so I wouldn't say she's a "sugar momma" 

Edited by red viking
Posted
3 minutes ago, red viking said:

Don't need it but I enjoy it. Can't help it that smart women with law degrees dig me. Incomes aren't too far apart though when u add my side gigs so I wouldn't say she's a "sugar momma" 

You sure you can use the word “women”when you don’t even know how to define them?   

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

You sure you can use the word “women”when you don’t even know how to define them?   

I'm not insecure w my sexuality like u are so if somebody wants to be called a woman ill call them a woman. Don't really care. 

It's not really that complicated. 

Edited by red viking
Posted
4 minutes ago, red viking said:

I'm not insecure w my sexuality like u are so if somebody wants to be called a woman ill call them a woman. Don't really care. 

It's not really that complicated. 

Calling them one doesn’t make them one but ok.  I’m guessing that’s how it works for you at home too. 

Posted
11 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Calling them one doesn’t make them one but ok.  I’m guessing that’s how it works for you at home too. 

No, she's always been female but it's pathetic that u go out if your way to bring this up and keep making related accusations. Demonstrates significant insecurity re: ur sexuality. 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, red viking said:

No, she's always been female but it's pathetic that u go out if your way to bring this up and keep making related accusations. Demonstrates significant insecurity re: ur sexuality. 

 

No. No. It doesn’t. I’m neither confused nor stupid about what and who I am.  

Posted
4 hours ago, Scouts Honor said:

leftists 2011: occupy wall street

leftists 2025: save wall street 

The wealthiest 10% of Americans own 93% of stocks even with market participation at a record high

Meanwhile, the bottom 50% of Americans held just 1% of all stocks in the third quarter of 2023.

Americans broadly have been participating in the stock market at a higher rate, with a record 58% of households owning stocks in 2023, according to the Fed’s Survey of Consumer Finances

  • Bob 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Scouts Honor said:

leftists 2011: occupy wall street

leftists 2025: save wall street 

That's another lie. Stock market is collapsing in large part BECAUSE of the impact on the poor and middle class. That's who ultimately pays tariffs. They're simply a regressive tax on poorer people. 

  • Bob 1
Posted
On 4/4/2025 at 7:50 PM, JimmySpeaks said:

Ackman's new statements on tariffs:

 

 

"I have a lot of respect for our president and what he has accomplished so far, but I don’t think he is infallible, which is why I am stating loud and clear that I strongly believe launching tariffs on April 9th against the entire world — massively in excess of what we are being charged — is a mistake."

  • Fire 1

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
49 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Ackman's new statements on tariffs:

 

 

"I have a lot of respect for our president and what he has accomplished so far, but I don’t think he is infallible, which is why I am stating loud and clear that I strongly believe launching tariffs on April 9th against the entire world — massively in excess of what we are being charged — is a mistake."

That’s the beauty. Everyone gets an opinion.  I’m of the belief that you have more leverage to start with blanket tariffs and then move to targeted tariffs.  It’s like when one side of Congress stuffs a whole bunch of pork in a bill and then barters with the other side on gives and takes.  It’s why when a company and a union have discussions they each have a list of things they want or don’t want and work towards a compromised agreement.  Is there risk?  100% but There are 50 countries lined up to negotiate right now and I think many will work out a deal in order to avoid the pain.  And I’d much rather be negotiating as the largest economy in the world than not.  Trump has five things that he feels are needed for a nation to be self sufficient. I believe the blanket tariffs will move to targeted tariffs on that agenda.  

Posted
23 hours ago, red viking said:

That's another lie. Stock market is collapsing in large part BECAUSE of the impact on the poor and middle class. That's who ultimately pays tariffs. They're simply a regressive tax on poorer people. 

where did i lie? 

  • Brain 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...