Rumor: FBI destroying files

[Caveira]

If true.   This is deeply disturbing.   It says if true ….

https://tribune.com.pk/story/2530745/fbi-allegedly-deleting-jeffrey-epstein-recordswhistleblower-speaks-out?amp=1
 

FBI allegedly deleting Jeffrey Epstein records—whistleblower speaks out

[Interviewed_at_Weehawken]

Just now, Caveira said:

If true.   This is deeply disturbing.   It says if true ….

https://tribune.com.pk/story/2530745/fbi-allegedly-deleting-jeffrey-epstein-recordswhistleblower-speaks-out?amp=1
 

 

FBI allegedly deleting Jeffrey Epstein records—whistleblower speaks out

I'm not sure I believe. 

If true, why wouldn't this have been done in November?

[headshuck]

Feels like AG Bondi went awfully quiet after saying she had the files on her desk.

[red viking]

If true, then there must be something about Trump or his billionaire donors in there. 

[jross]

Trump called for the release.

So....

Something else.

It is okay to take time to add context.  Reduce witch hunting.

But do it.

[red viking]

7 minutes ago, jross said:

Trump called for the release.

So....

Something else.

It is okay to take time to add context.  Reduce witch hunting.

But do it.

It's pretty simple. The Trump administration is running the FBI. If they're destroying files, Kash probably directed it or knows about it. That's called statistical probability. More likely than low-on-the-totem-pole workers (that likely never interacted with Epstein) risking their jobs to destroy files and the general public finding out before the FBI administration itself. 

So the big qualifier is "if this is even true in the first place." 

[mspart]

If True Kash wouldn't have the institutional  knowledge to do this.   Big qualifier is DOGE is after everyone and so is Kash so they are getting rid of evidence, if this is is even happening.  Hillary got away with it, why not them. 

mspart

[jross]

3 hours ago, red viking said:

It's pretty simple. The Trump administration is running the FBI. If they're destroying files, Kash probably directed it or knows about it. That's called statistical probability. More likely than low-on-the-totem-pole workers (that likely never interacted with Epstein) risking their jobs to destroy files and the general public finding out before the FBI administration itself. 

So the big qualifier is "if this is even true in the first place." 

Wild!  Trump’s team pushed hard to release files... fired people, hired their own... then they delete the the files? 

The simplest answer is that there are still people in the FBI that do not want to incriminate certain people.  They either have a fat paycheck or want to prevent the noose.

[mspart]

Nah the easier answer is that Trump is hiding stuff.   Obviously.

mspart

[pokemonster]

They better release the files wtf. Lock em all up.

[mspart]

4 minutes ago, pokemonster said:

They better release the files wtf. Lock em all up.

How can they if they are destroyed?   I wonder if 51 intelligence folks will write a letter and say this is Russian disinformation.  

mspart

[1032004]

10 hours ago, mspart said:

How can they if they are destroyed? 

Didn’t Bondi recently say the Epstein list was “on her desk”?  I get that’s a euphemism but sounds to me like she’s seen it.  If the list disappears I think you have to blame the current admin.  But I don’t think it will.  Hopefully it gets released sooner than later.

[jross]

Tired of hype merchants?

yes!

[Caveira]

4 hours ago, 1032004 said:

Didn’t Bondi recently say the Epstein list was “on her desk”?  I get that’s a euphemism but sounds to me like she’s seen it.  If the list disappears I think you have to blame the current admin.  But I don’t think it will.  Hopefully it gets released sooner than later.

Hypotherical.  What if it’s 183% redacted like some of the times in the past….. and they’re scrambling to delete the raw data.   What if it’s a summary like the times in the past?